Explaining Trump: Widespread Government Corruption

Explaining Trump: Widespread Government Corruption

This blog post is part of an ongoing series that originated with the post Killing Small Business.

It's been fashionable to make jokes about Congress' historically low approval ratings, unbelievable incompetence in the government and now, unfortunately, the perception of widespread government corruption. Pundits and talk-radio hosts have a field day with this. So do late-night comics.

It's not funny anymore.

A staggering 75% of the American public believe corruption is "widespread" in the U.S. government. Not incompetence, but corruption. This alarming figure has held steady since 2010, up from 66% in 2009.

This sense of corruption probably contributes to much of the extreme anxiety and unrest we see today - including protests, lower voter turnout and increased interest in guns.

Guns -- a symbol of freedom from government tyranny to many people -- are now a key voting issue. A quarter of U.S. voters say the presidential candidate they vote for must share their view on guns.

Protests are growing in cities and campuses all around the country. Students and citizens generally have lost faith in their national institutions -- the biggest and most powerful of which is, of course, the federal government.

The last presidential election had an estimated 5 million fewer voters than turned out in 2008, and the 2014 midterm elections saw the lowest turnout in 72 years (36.3%). At alarming levels, citizens -- when invited to participate directly in their own democracy -- are taking a pass and staying home. Or taking their frustrations to the streets.

The perception that there's widespread corruption in the national government could be a symptom of citizen disengagement and anger. Or it could be a cause -- we don't know. But it's very possible this is a big, dark cloud that hangs over this country's progress. And it might be fueling the rise of an unlikely, non-traditional leading Republican candidate for the presidency, Donald Trump.

To make matters worse, that dark cloud appears to be hanging over the growth of small business, which is where virtually all new GDP growth and good jobs originate. Simply put, startups and shootups (small businesses that grow larger) have been in a death spiral. The U.S. Census Bureau reported that the total number of business startups and business closures per year crossed for the first time in 2008.

And the economy isn't growing nearly fast enough -- it's been running at an average rate of 2% since the 2008 financial collapse and the Great Recession. Just to compare, following the recession of 1981-1982, GDP grew for six years at 4.5% -- one of our greatest economic eras in history.

Jobs haven't come back. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the percentage of the total adult population that has a full-time job has been hovering around 48% since 2010 -- the lowest full-time employment level since 1983. This is why the middle class has been dangerously shrinking.

You don't have to connect too many dots to conclude that if a government has an alarmingly high appearance of widespread corruption -- and that same government creates regulations that businesses cite as a leading barrier to growth -- then entrepreneurs might be reluctant to stick their necks out to start a business. Or to boom the businesses they already have.

Why would they start or boom a business if they think a corrupt government is creating rules and regulations that don't serve their interests -- but rather rules that serve the interests of corrupt officials, corrupt politicians, corrupt insiders and corrupt special interest groups?

Any wonder why so many Americans want a candidate who's outside of that system?

***

Jim Clifton is Chairman and CEO of Gallup. He is author of The Coming Jobs War (Gallup Press, 2011).

Mesfin Ayenew

Investment Grade Real Estate

7 年

The intent of your article is not clear. Are you suggesting voters elected a president that will end corruption? The most insidious problem in American Governance is the direct interference by those who control the elections and legislative outcomes at every level of government in the Country. It is well documented in the book: DARK MONEY. The leaders of such operations have been using all the tools at their disposal that is necessary to subvert our democracy. Many of the tactics are down right deceiving : Crossroads institute, Americans for competitiveness, the Cato institute, George Mason university to name a fraction of the myriads of tentacles of so called " not for profit" organizations. Not to mention the media propaganda machine as in Fox . How much more corrupt can it be to use tax payers money; donors funding subversive "not- for profit" operations and then claiming their contribution as a tax deductible item! Some disguise their veil intent by paying for so called grassroots organizations! as in the fragments of the tea party, etc. Or manipulating religious fever and race conflict. The new president is supposed to drain the swamp. He actually filled the swamp with the thickest mud sill. Rewards for money contribution. Nor the president believe in transparency: refused to release his tax return; will not disclose debt obligation from foreign banks and has declared that he is not subject to conflict of interest norms of prior presidents. A president whose behavior towards women is lower than the most retched of the earth. Need I remind you the famous grab them by___ or the Howard Stern recording about violating a women and then worry about the consequence later! Despite millions marching in protest, the next day he signs an executive order impacting women right! Is your article implying that voters elected an outsider who is in fact a model of ethics?

回复
Nathan Reynolds

Laboratory Assistant at TCL Labs

8 年

Did you know the state of WA will actually pay the unemployed to leave?! Yes, if you want to leave dysfunctional and dying WA the state employment dept will actually assist you, but only if you relocate to a more vibrant economic location. Crazy!

回复
Dalton Kehoe

Communication Scholar by Training & Consultant by Practice

8 年

This makes sense to me. Recently, many of the "revolutions" around the world have emerged after prolonged economic stagnation or decline. At a more personal level, another explanation for Donald Trump's current success is emotional contagion. We have good data now showing that unless people consciously choose not to, they can't help imitating the dominant emotion "in the room" - in this case, anger displayed as rudeness. At work when people witness the boss being rude to an employee, they are more likely to be rude to the next person they deal with. Donald is simply running this "experiment" at a national scale thanks to a headllne hungry media.

回复
eylon _ ?? shine everyday ??

Parkinson Away?, Reverse the Parkinson's state swiftly and the entire PD condition slowly :)

8 年

Alijandra Mogilner

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Jim Clifton的更多文章

  • The Mood of the World

    The Mood of the World

    EXCERPTED FROM WELLBEING AT WORK, RELEASED TODAY FROM GALLUP PRESS. JIM CLIFTON COAUTHORED THE BOOK WITH GALLUP CHIEF…

    29 条评论
  • Does Capitalism Need a Soul Transplant?

    Does Capitalism Need a Soul Transplant?

    Environmental, social and governance (ESG) refer to new reporting standards for a company's impact that goes beyond its…

    33 条评论
  • 42 Million Want to Migrate to U.S.

    42 Million Want to Migrate to U.S.

    Here are questions every leader should be able to answer regardless of their politics: How many more people are coming…

    34 条评论
  • Did You Risk Your Life Today?

    Did You Risk Your Life Today?

    Gallup and Lloyd’s Register Foundation just completed the first-ever global study of risk in our lives -- the Lloyd’s…

    9 条评论
  • Black America: How Is Your Life Going?

    Black America: How Is Your Life Going?

    Economists and government agencies know a lot about Black Americans. Through massive government and corporate data…

    39 条评论
  • The Roots of Income Inequality

    The Roots of Income Inequality

    Gallup Chairman Jim Clifton interviewed Jonathan Rothwell, Gallup's principal economist, about his book on income…

    63 条评论
  • Do You Trust Science?

    Do You Trust Science?

    We're living at a time in history when trust in many major institutions of importance around the world has collapsed…

    13 条评论
  • It's the Manager

    It's the Manager

    Gallup Chairman and CEO Jim Clifton was interviewed recently by Phil Laboon of Arianna Huffington's Thrive Global about…

    15 条评论
  • America Stopped Building

    America Stopped Building

    On a visit to the Princeton campus recently, I asked a famous economics professor a simple question, "Are we in a…

    164 条评论
  • What If There Were 42 Million at the Border?

    What If There Were 42 Million at the Border?

    Here's a good question about caravans: How many more are coming? Gallup asked the whole population of Latin America…

    1,147 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了