Expert Determination: A Faster, Cheaper Way to Resolve Construction Disputes

Introduction

If you've worked in construction long enough, you know disputes can happen – over design changes, delays, payments, you name it. Too often, these conflicts spiral into lengthy litigation or arbitration, draining time and money and straining business relationships. But what if there were a quicker, less combative way to settle certain disputes?

Enter Expert Determination, an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) method that is especially useful for construction professionals. Expert determination is a form of ADR where the parties ask an independent expert to decide the issue in dispute (Quickguide - Expert Determination). When used in the right situations, it can provide a speedy, cost-effective, and final resolution to technical or specialised disagreements. Surprisingly, expert determination remains one of the least-used tools in construction dispute resolution (Expert Determination of Construction Disputes: The Pros and Cons) – despite being cheap, quick, and effective when done properly. In this article, we'll explore what expert determination is, how it works, its key benefits (like speed, cost savings, confidentiality, and finality), why you should include expert determination clauses in your contracts, and examples of disputes where it could have made a big difference. By the end, you'll see why this underutilised method might be the secret weapon your project needs for smoother conflict resolution.

What Is Expert Determination and How Does It Work?

Expert Determination is an ADR process in which the parties to a contract agree to appoint an independent expert (usually someone with specialised knowledge in the subject matter of the dispute) to make a decision. Unlike mediation (which seeks a negotiated compromise) or arbitration (which is a quasi-legal tribunal), expert determination is typically binding (if the contract says so) and focused on a narrow, technical question. In simple terms, the expert acts as a mini-judge on a specific issue, but one who has the technical expertise to cut through complex details. For example, in a construction context, the expert might be a seasoned engineer deciding whether work met the specified standards, or a quantity surveyor determining the value of a variation.

The process is straightforward and contractual. Usually, the construction contract will have an expert determination clause outlining how an expert is chosen (e.g. jointly by the parties or by a nominating body), what disputes can be referred, and whether the expert’s decision will be final and binding. When a dispute arises that falls under that clause, the parties submit their positions (often in writing) to the expert. The expert may review documents, ask questions, and even conduct tests or site inspections if needed. One big advantage is flexibility – there is no rigid court procedure to follow. The expert can actively investigate and use their own knowledge to fill in gaps, rather than relying solely on what each side presents (Expert Determination of Construction Disputes: The Pros and Cons). This inquisitorial approach is ideal for technical problems. The proceedings are private and informal: typically no public hearings, no cross-examination circus – just the expert examining the facts and delivering a decision.

Once the expert makes a determination, what happens next depends on the parties’ prior agreement. In many cases, the decision is agreed to be final and binding, meaning both sides must accept it as the resolution of that dispute. There is usually no appeal or protracted review possible – which is exactly the point: finality. Courts and arbitrators generally respect this; if you’ve contractually agreed to be bound by an expert’s decision, it’s difficult to challenge it (Quickguide - Expert Determination). (Only very limited grounds like fraud or clear missteps by the expert would justify overturning it.) The expert’s decision, in effect, becomes another term of the contract that both parties are obligated to honor. This finality is a double-edged sword: it gives certainty, but it also means you need to trust the expert’s competence. That’s why choosing a truly qualified, neutral expert is critical to making the process work. Overall, expert determination is a creature of contract – it exists because you and the other party agreed to use it. And if one party tries to back out after agreeing to it, courts can hold them to that promise (Quickguide - Expert Determination). In summary, expert determination is an ADR method tailor-made for resolving specific technical issues quickly by tapping the knowledge of an expert, in a process you control through your contract terms.

Benefits of Expert Determination for Construction Disputes

Why should construction professionals consider expert determination? Simply put, it offers several key advantages over going straight to arbitration or court. Here are some of the top benefits:

• Speed: Construction projects run on tight timelines, and a drawn-out dispute can derail progress. Expert determination is typically much faster than litigation or even arbitration. With a single expert and streamlined procedure, disputes that might take years in court can often be resolved in a matter of weeks or a few months. There’s no waiting for court dates or lengthy hearings – the expert gets to work quickly. This speed means you get answers while they still matter, helping keep the project on track.
• Cost-Effectiveness: Time is money, especially in construction. By resolving issues faster and with less formality, expert determination saves significant costs. You avoid many of the legal fees, court costs, and extended claims for delay or disruption that come with protracted fights. Only one expert is engaged (instead of dueling experts, multiple lawyers, and a judge/arbitrator), which keeps expenses down (Expert Determination of Construction Disputes: The Pros and Cons) (Use of expert determination mechanisms | Global law firm | Norton Rose Fulbright). Also, because the process is mainly document-driven and doesn’t usually require full-blown hearings, it’s inherently cheaper. In short, you spend far less on resolving the dispute, and more on getting the work done.
• Expertise in the Dispute: In construction disputes, technical details matter. With expert determination, you get to choose an adjudicator who is already an expert in the subject. Whether it’s an engineer, architect, surveyor, or other specialist, the decision-maker will speak the same technical language as the parties. This expertise leads to more informed and fair decisions on complex matters. Judges or arbitrators often need to rely on expert witnesses to understand technical issues (Use of expert determination mechanisms | Global law firm | Norton Rose Fulbright), but here the “judge” is the expert. That not only improves the quality of the outcome but also streamlines the process (no need for each side to hire their own experts to educate a tribunal). The result is a resolution that the parties can have more confidence in, because it was determined by someone who truly understands the nuances.
• Confidentiality and Reduced Adversarial Tone: Nobody in a construction project wants their dirty laundry aired in public. Unlike court cases, which are public, expert determination is a private process (Quickguide - Expert Determination). The dispute and outcome remain confidential between the parties (unless they agree to reveal it). This privacy can be crucial for protecting business reputations and relationships. Moreover, the process tends to be less adversarial. Since it’s informal and focused on solving a technical problem rather than “winning a case,” there’s less posturing and blame. The shorter timeline and collaborative nature of choosing an expert help avoid the bitterness that lengthy legal battles often cause. All of this means that the business relationship between the parties – say, owner and contractor – is more likely to survive the dispute. Indeed, expert determination is often seen as less likely to damage commercial relationships going forward than litigation or arbitration (Expert Determination of Construction Disputes: The Pros and Cons). You’re essentially working together to find a quick answer, rather than fighting in a public arena.
• Finality and Certainty: When you opt for binding expert determination, you are usually getting a final answer. There’s a lot of value in that certainty. In court or arbitration, even after a decision, one side might appeal or challenge it, dragging the issue out for another round. With expert determination, generally there is no appeal – the dispute is done and dusted. This finality means you can move on with the project knowing the matter is settled, instead of a cloud hanging over it. It also discourages parties from taking extreme positions, since they know they can’t rely on drawn-out tactics or multiple appeals. Of course, finality also means you have to accept the result, win or lose. But if you’ve chosen a competent expert and provided them with clear instructions, you can have confidence in the outcome. The benefit is a decisive resolution that brings much-needed closure and lets everyone refocus on the project.

In summary, expert determination can save you time and money, leverage true expertise, keep disputes private and relationships intact, and provide closure. These are huge benefits for anyone in the construction industry who has witnessed how disruptive a prolonged dispute can be. It’s not suitable for every situation (for example, if the dispute is purely legal or has allegations of serious misconduct, other forums might be better). But for many technical or quantifiable issues, it’s an ADR option worth seriously considering.

Including Expert Determination Clauses in Construction Contracts

To take advantage of expert determination, you need to plan for it before a dispute arises. This means including an expert determination clause in your construction contracts. Why is this so important? Because without a pre-agreed clause, both parties would have to voluntarily agree to use expert determination when a conflict comes up – and by that point, people might be too adversarial to agree on anything! A well-drafted clause ensures that if a covered dispute happens, everyone is already committed to trying expert determination first (or at least as one step in the dispute resolution process). It essentially secures a fast-track mechanism in advance, which can be a lifesaver when schedules and budgets are on the line.

Including an expert determination provision also lets you customise how it will work for your project. For instance, the contract can specify the type of expert (e.g. “a structural engineer with at least 15 years of experience” for a structural design dispute), how the expert will be selected (joint agreement, list from a professional body, etc.), and that the expert’s decision will be final and binding on certain issues. You can even limit the scope: perhaps only technical matters or valuation disputes go to expert determination, while other disputes might go to arbitration. This tailoring is useful – it recognises that expert determination is best for some issues (like technical disagreements or measurement of quantities) and not as appropriate for others (like accusations of breach of contract or negligence, which might need a different forum). By spelling out the process, timeline, and binding nature, the clause gives both parties a clear roadmap of what will happen in case of a disagreement.

Another key reason to have it in the contract is enforceability. Courts generally uphold parties’ agreements to use alternative dispute resolution methods. In fact, if one party tries to ignore the expert determination clause and rush to court, a judge can stay the court proceedings and insist they follow the agreed ADR process. There have even been cases where a party who breached an expert determination clause had to pay for the other side’s wasted legal costs (Quickguide - Expert Determination). In short, by having the clause, you’re making it clear that this is not optional – it’s the agreed first (or final) step. This adds certainty that when a dispute pops up, it will indeed be addressed through the quicker expert route rather than automatically becoming a full-blown legal battle.

From a practical standpoint, mentioning expert determination in your contracts also signals to your partners (clients, contractors, subcontractors) that you prefer to handle issues efficiently and collaboratively. It sets a tone of problem-solving over finger-pointing. Many standard construction contracts don’t include expert determination by default, focusing on litigation, arbitration, or adjudication. But there’s nothing stopping you from adding an expert determination clause. It’s a simple addition that could save everyone a lot of trouble down the road. Be sure to consult with a construction lawyer or contracts specialist when drafting it – the clause should be clearly written so that it’s enforceable and covers how an expert is appointed and how the process will work. With the right clause in place, you’ve equipped your project with a powerful tool to manage disputes before they escalate.

When Expert Determination Could Have Made a Difference

To appreciate the value of expert determination, consider a few scenarios common in construction where it wasn’t used – and think about how differently things could have gone if it had been:

• Technical Design Dispute Drags into Court: Imagine a project where the owner and contractor clash over whether a complex foundation design meets the contract requirements. They ended up in litigation, hiring dueling engineering experts and spending two years in court to get an answer. Expert determination could have changed this story. Had there been an expert determination clause, both sides could have appointed a reputable structural engineer to review the design and decide if it met the specs. Within a few months – instead of years – they would have a binding decision on the issue. This fast resolution would have saved enormous legal fees and kept the project on schedule, all behind closed doors with no public spectacle.
• Payment and Valuation Dispute Escalates: Consider a contractor and client locked in a heated arbitration over the value of several change orders and delay claims. Each side has quantum experts calculating different numbers, and the arbitration stretches on and on. This is a perfect example of a dispute that expert determination could handle. If their contract had sent any valuation disputes to expert determination, a jointly appointed quantity surveyor or cost engineer could have sifted through the accounts and decided the proper payment due. The process might have taken a few weeks of document exchange and analysis, resulting in a final number that both sides must accept. By not using expert determination, the parties subjected themselves to a far more expensive and time-consuming process, with the added risk that even after arbitration, someone might seek to challenge the award. A quick expert decision early on could have preserved cash flow and trust between the parties.
• Project Delay Blame-Game: Delays are a classic source of conflict in construction. Now picture a scenario where a project ran late, and each party blames the other – the contractor cites design changes, the owner cites poor management. Without an agreed fast-track, this dispute goes to adjudication or court, becoming a protracted battle of scheduling experts and witnesses. Had expert determination been an option, the parties could have picked an experienced construction scheduler or delay analysis expert to investigate and determine the main cause of delay and responsibility. In a matter of a few months, they would get an impartial analysis and decision, allowing them to move forward with that knowledge. This not only would save time and money, but also reduce animosity – both sides might be more willing to accept the outcome coming from a neutral expert they chose, rather than from the opposing side’s lawyer in court.

In each of these cases, not having an expert determination clause meant the disputes followed the default path of lengthy, adversarial proceedings. The results were drawn-out resolutions, higher costs, and damaged relationships. It’s easy to see how inserting an expert determination step could have led to a quicker, smoother outcome. While hindsight is 20/20, savvy professionals can learn from these scenarios and proactively include mechanisms like expert determination to avoid such pitfalls.

Conclusion: Embrace Expert Determination in Your Projects

Disputes may be inevitable in construction, but costly and drawn-out resolutions are not. Expert determination offers a proactive way to handle certain conflicts efficiently, saving time, money, and headaches for all involved. As we've discussed, this method brings in the right expertise to make the call, in a private and speedy manner, giving you a final answer so you can get back to work. In an industry where every minute and every dollar counts, leveraging expert determination can be a game-changer for your project’s success and for preserving business relationships.

The key is to plan ahead. Next time you’re negotiating a construction contract, consider including an expert determination clause. Think about the types of disputes that could derail your project and how an expert’s quick decision might keep things on track. Talk to your legal advisor or a dispute resolution expert about drafting a clause that fits your needs. It’s a simple addition that can pay off enormously when a disagreement arises.

Don’t wait until you’re stuck in a courtroom or arbitration hearing to realise there could have been a better way. If you’re a construction professional – whether an owner, contractor, consultant, or project manager – take the initiative now. Explore the option of expert determination for your contracts and projects.

Reach out for guidance on how to implement it effectively. By embracing expert determination, you equip yourself to resolve disputes on your terms: swiftly, privately, and with expert insight. In the high-stakes world of construction, that can make all the difference. Here’s to building not just projects, but stronger partnerships through smarter dispute resolution!

?