Will the Experience of Covid Change School PE?
In a time of unprecedented turbulence, and social change, little is unimpacted. Physical Education in schools is no exception. Many schools, and teachers, are critically evaluating the place and purpose of this as a compulsory experience for all pupils within the timetable.
One reason is undoubtedly the absence of the pressures of the usual school programmes, especially the requirement to prepare teams for inter-school competition. This has resulted in greater capacity for reflection and innovation. There is also a prevailing atmosphere of reconsideration: so many regular operating practices have been suspended for so long that the question arises as to whether they should be restored intact as soon as possible, or whether they may be a better way of doing things. In the parlance of the day, a re-boot becomes possible, and even desirable.
Thirdly, however, is the nagging feeling that core PE lessons might have fallen behind their more glamorous cousins in school sport, where the drive to improve coaching standards and methods has been constant. Improving the coaching of games has commanded the attention and creativity of schools for some years. Inevitably, an industry has grown up to support innovation, and a virtuous cycle of improvement emerges. This has not been reflected in developments in PE teaching.
The pandemic has started to change that. There are emerging twin awarenesses – that PE provision could be better, and that its content might be made more relevant to a Covid-world. As a result, schools are experimenting with new approaches, and establishing collaborative networks at a rate previously unknown. The skills-based approach which has dominated recent years is being exposed as inadequate and irrelevant in a world facing unique challenges. Six weeks of badminton, with a different technique focus every week, is within the comfort zone of most teachers, and tacitly accepted by inspectors, but it doesn’t seem to exploit the full potential of this subject, during a crisis which is impacting on both health and activity levels.
So, what are the new approaches? One is certainly centred around physical literacy and fundamental movement. There is a recognition that these are the foundations of any sports skills that come later, but also that sedentary lifestyles do not establish strong movement patterns. If children are going to develop these anywhere, then school PE must be at the heart of this. Another is a focus on health and wellbeing. This surely must be the priority for programmes of the future, enabling pupils to learn the significance of active lifestyles, and providing the skills and attitudes to achieve them.
Additional innovations abound. Leadership skills, communication, mental capacities and social abilities are all subjects of exploratory programmes around the country.
There is gathering momentum, and interesting exchanges of views. However, this drive has not yet reached the tipping point that would be necessary to create an epidemic. An unintended impact of the second wave is that lasting developments to this unique subject may have time to embed themselves as – in the hackneyed expression of the day – “the new normal”
Please follow my company, Independent Coach Education, on LinkedIn in order to see our latest training, recruitment and advisory services in school sport.
Sports Coach
4 年Lastly, as I couldn’t quite finish what I wanted to say in my previous comments: If children from Key stage 1 to 2 are correctly inspired to partake in fun games at school, they are much more likely to engage in and relish sport in KS3/4. Teachers need well plannned sessions that incorporate the key coaching FUNdamentals of: Agility, Balance & coordination. Without sounding patronising, as most people that read this will already know this. However, for those that don’t: All children should have learned the following movement skills by year 6: to run, jump, catch, hop, throw, gallop, skip, leap, kick. If they haven’t acquired these skills during these formative years, they are much less likely to enjoy secondary school games lessons and KS3/4 sporting activities. The youngsters with the correct genetic coding and environmental support may go forth and follow the LTAD pathway in their chosen sport/s. This is how we produce great teams, club players and ethos. Not to mention a lifelong love of sport and/or the future GB superstars too.
Sports Coach
4 年I couldn’t agree more with this article. There is so much more to sport than purely the physiological benefits. The mental health aspects are equally, if not more valuable right now. Sport can improve mood by increasing the levels of endorphins. I crave these chemicals when I’m prevented from exercising, due to injury, disease or any other barrier that prevents me from doing so. I only need to run a half hour game of “ball thief” or “tails” for KS1 or KS2 to animate any child. It’s a joy to see them running around a pitch, no matter what their sporting prowess. Consequently the pupils get their endorphins, without it becoming a punishment. Many kids (not the uber fit) groan at the class teacher’s daily mile PE lesson. Physical activity has been shown to improve childrens concentration in class. It also has other benefits, such as reducing stress and depression. Other proven benefits include: improved sleep, muscle tone and an aid to maintaining a healthier BMI. This is salient in a western world where increasingly numbers of under 10’s are defined as clinically obese; thus setting them up for a potential host of life long damaging conditions. Team sport can improve a child’s self confidence & leadership skills.
I'm happy to deliver insets for schools that need some help. Filled with lesson plans, slide decks and a game based learning approach. Message me if interested
Assistant Head - Director of Studies at Stonyhurst College
4 年Perfectly written and perfectly true. A lovely, correct and well-timed article ????