(Expedited) Designations for Deals: a Win-Win Strategy?
My previous post listed all the announced deals amid the JP Morgan's Healthcare Conference 2025. But I am more curious about how many the drugs of those deals are associated with expedited designations from Health Authorities like FDA and EMA, and any trends across therapeutic areas.
A little background information, the FDA uses four distinct mechanisms to speed the development and availability of drugs treating serious or life-threatening conditions, which I recapped them below as a quick reference.
·?????? Accelerated Approval allows drugs for serious conditions to be approved based on surrogate endpoints that are reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit.
·?????? Fast track designation is meant to expedite the review of drugs that treat serious conditions and fill an unmet medical need.
·?????? Breakthrough therapy designation is for drugs that show substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints.
·?????? Priority Review designation asks for potentials and/or evidences of a significant improvement in safety or effectiveness over existing therapies, which in turn will greatly accelerate the NDA review time within six months vs standard ten-month review period.
Orphan drug designation (aka ODD) which is given to drugs intended to treat rare diseases affecting fewer than 200,000 people in the U.S, can offers market exclusivity, tax credits, FDA fee waiver, grant eligibility, and regulatory assistance like more frequent guidance during drug development.
According to my observation, out of the 37 deals and collaborations listed from my previous post, 32 drugs?have been granted or will have great potentials for at least one of expedited program designations or ODD.
I’m grouping expedited designations by therapeutic areas, such as oncology and neurology, to provide a detailed narrative summary. This approach ensures a clear organization and thorough analysis, highlighting key measures for each area. Below is an analysis of the expedited designations grouped by therapeutic areas, along with observations on trends and strategic focuses:
1. Oncology
Oncology represents the largest group among the expedited designations, reflecting the high unmet need and evolving therapeutic innovations in cancer treatment. Key observations include:
Summary Observation: There is a pronounced focus on precision therapies (targeting specific molecular alterations such as ROS1, ALK, HER2, and ROR1) and on addressing both common and rare hematologic malignancies. The prevalence of Accelerated Approval and Breakthrough designations underscores the critical need for novel treatments in cancers with limited options.
2. Neurology and Neuromuscular Disorders
This category includes both rare neuromuscular conditions and neurodegenerative disorders:
Summary Observation: The designations in this area underscore a dual focus on genetic and rare neuromuscular diseases, with both traditional and gene therapy approaches emerging. Expedited pathways (Orphan, Fast Track, and potential Accelerated Approvals) signal robust innovation aimed at conditions with high unmet needs.
3. Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders
A number of expedited programs are targeting cardiovascular conditions, often intertwined with metabolic or systemic disorders:
Summary Observation: The expedited designations in this segment reflect increasing innovation in both heart diseases (with a focus on cardiomyopathies that often have a genetic or protein misfolding basis) and metabolic liver disorders. The use of biomarkers for accelerated approvals and the emergence of mRNA/gene therapy modalities are notable trends.
4. Hematology
Within hematology, particularly the myelodysplastic syndromes:
Summary Observation: The focus on lower?risk MDS indicates an effort to address unmet needs in patient subsets that may not be served by current therapies, with expedited pathways enabling more rapid clinical development.
5. Nephrology
In nephrology, the designations address both kidney function and related complications:
Summary Observation: The therapies under this category emphasize innovative approaches—including cell therapy—to improve renal function and treat complications associated with CKD, highlighting a strategy to move beyond conventional treatments.
6. Other Therapeutic Areas
Summary Observation: The designations in psychiatry and infectious diseases underscore the FDA’s willingness to fast‐track therapies for conditions that, although may not affect large populations, have significant individual impacts and limited current treatment options. The inclusion of rare and orphan indications further demonstrates the importance of addressing unmet needs in smaller patient populations.
Overall Insights
It's nice to see how the expedited designation strategies are being leveraged to address critical areas of unmet need across a diverse range of therapeutic areas, with oncology and rare diseases leading the way in innovation and regulatory flexibility. My next goal and post will be to dive deeper into those drugs and cross-reference them with deal-makings individually from my previous post, for any insights and trends beyond expedited programs and deal-making logics. Simply put is to whether those expedited program can actually win business deals, where FDA in a way serves as the first layer of lens on the drug before any BD, PE, VC, and bankers jump on the valuation train.