No Exit for Infringes

No Exit for Infringes

Background: We, at Soroker Agmon Nordman, Advocates & Patent Attorneys represent Je Woo Corporation Ltd, a manufacturer of lighting products, based in China. JE WOO’s products are distributed in many countries around the world and in Israel by Isralux Ltd. One of the products distributed by Isralux is Je WOO's emergency exit sign (see below):

Earlier this year, it came to our client’s attention that Golden Light Lighting Projects Ltd., an Israeli distributor, has been selling emergency exit signs - that infringe on JE WOO’s intellectual property rights. These products were labeled as original products manufactured by JE WOO.

The similarity between the original JE WOO products and the infringing goods was striking. The infringing product’s confusingly similar packaging, included unauthorized use of the registered trademark JE WOO, as well copies of JE WOO photographs from the original packaging. Even the instruction sheet attached to the product, was copied. The infringing goods were designed to mislead consumers who believed they were buying original JE WOO products.

Eran Soroker and Robert Dorneanu from our litigation team motioned the Central District Court on behalf of JE WOO and Isralux, seeking a temporary injunctive relief on an ex-parte basis. The purpose of the ex-parte injunction was to prevent Golden light from dumping the infringing goods. The District Court set a hearing to decide on the injunction. 

Prior to the hearing, the parties held intense negotiations. Golden light argued that no infringing products were left in stock, therefore were prepared to accept a temporary injunction in favor of JE WOO and to provide a report with regards to the infringing goods including prices, quantities sold, the manufacturer’s details and the importation documents. However, the negotiations ended without an agreement as the parties did not agree on the amount of compensation to be paid to the plaintiffs.

At the hearing, the Court, based on the parties' consent, incorporated these understandings reached by the parties into a Judgment. The Court also granted a permanent injunction and ordered Golden Light to pay Plaintiffs NIS 135,000 approximately US$ 37,290.

 Civil Case 54741-04-18 JE WOO CORPORATION Ltd v. Golden Light

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Eran Soroker的更多文章

  • "A Flat for Rent": May Two Intellectual Property Rights Cohabit? Eran Soroker & Robert Dorneanu

    "A Flat for Rent": May Two Intellectual Property Rights Cohabit? Eran Soroker & Robert Dorneanu

    In a landmark decision, the Tel Aviv District Court has recently ruled on a complex case in which copyright and…

  • When AI meets IP

    When AI meets IP

    The buzzword of the day is Artificial Intelligence. The importance of AI and its relevance to IP cannot be overstated.

    4 条评论
  • Hasta la Vista Vapey: Proving the Evidence of Absence

    Hasta la Vista Vapey: Proving the Evidence of Absence

    Typically, the formula for winning a Civil case is straightforward: plaintiff proves defendants actions using evidence…

    4 条评论
  • New Developments in Israeli Privacy Law

    New Developments in Israeli Privacy Law

    Soroker Agmon Nordman was chosen by the IAB to partake in a pilot project seeking to compile privacy law across the…

  • IP PROTECTION: MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE

    IP PROTECTION: MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE

    From Gucci to Ray Ban, sunglasses brands are a big deal. Each year, companies spend millions of dollars creating brand…

  • AN END TO CYBERSQUATTING

    AN END TO CYBERSQUATTING

    Domain Names and Trademark Law From a branding perspective, choosing a domain name is a simple task. If it is…

  • Habitat Vs. Habitat

    Habitat Vs. Habitat

    40 years later | A 5-ACT TALE OF RIGHTS AND USE Prelude Both sides of our tale want to use and register the trademark…

  • Korrect Spelling

    Korrect Spelling

    Urbanica vs. ūrbanika (with a "K") Background: Our client, Urbanica is an Israeli success story with huge fashion and…

  • Infusing spoon or infringing spoon? Joseph Joseph vs. Jesopb Jesopb

    Infusing spoon or infringing spoon? Joseph Joseph vs. Jesopb Jesopb

    Recently, Joseph Joseph, an award winning international houseware brand, discovered that an Israeli supermarket chain…

    1 条评论
  • XL vs. XT | The XL Factor

    XL vs. XT | The XL Factor

    Can the famous energy drink company XL prevent the sale of energy drinks sold under the brand "XT"? This was the…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了