This Existential HR Gap is Widening
I’m concerned.
As part of doing the research for a new course for LinkedIn Learning on how to use data-driven evidence to drive HR change, I’ve discovered a potential existential threat to the HR department. And I don’t think I’m “crying wolf” here, either, but be sure to comment below and add your perspective.
Consider that HR departments are tasked with managing the most valuable and complex assets of any organization: its people. Challenges such as employee engagement, diversity and inclusion, retention, job satisfaction, employee and management development, and hiring are not just “HR issues” but are central to the overall success of any organization. In today's fast-paced business environment, relying solely on human judgment and traditional processes is not only inefficient but can also lead to biased or suboptimal decision-making.
It seems that the reluctance of many HR leaders to embrace data-driven approaches stems from a lack of familiarity and comfort with data and AI tools. However, it's important to note that the shift towards incorporating AI and ML doesn't replace the human element in HR; instead, it enhances it by providing deeper insights, predicting outcomes, and automating routine tasks, allowing HR professionals to focus on more strategic initiatives.
This will become more important than ever as economic and global political forces impact every business decision from how products are designed, built and distributed and the workforce implications of all of these changes. It’s vital that HR leaders be part of the discussion and not ignored, or they'll be left behind. This is what will be required to have a seat at the strategic table, if not to lead it.
If fact, it’s now apparent that that those HR leaders who embrace data-driven approaches are transforming their departments into strategic powerhouses . By leveraging AI and ML, they're able to analyze vast amounts of data on employee engagement, diversity, retention, and more, uncovering insights that were previously unattainable.
These innovators use predictive analytics to foresee and address issues before they escalate, crafting targeted strategies that significantly improve employee retention and satisfaction, and who gets hired, promoted or let go. Their approach to recruitment is revolutionized by AI, allowing them to not only speed up the hiring process but also ensure that candidates are a better fit for the company culture and job requirements , leading to longer tenures and greater productivity.
The Traditionalists: Falling Behind in a Data-Driven World
In contrast, HR leaders who resist the shift towards data-driven decision-making find their departments and companies increasingly at a disadvantage. Without the insights provided by data analysis, their strategies and plans are often reactive rather than proactive and their solutions outdated. This leads to higher turnover rates, lower employee engagement, and a failure to address systemic issues within the company culture.
The traditionalist approach to recruitment remains outdated, slow and biased, leading to less effective hires and a workforce that may not meet the evolving needs of the business. Without data to guide development programs, these HR departments often cannot adequately support the growth and advancement of their employees, resulting in stagnant career paths and diminished job satisfaction.
领英推荐
The Impact on Companies
The difference in approaches leads to tangible outcomes for companies. Those embracing data-driven HR practices are likely to see improved employee morale, higher productivity, and greater innovation. They adapt more quickly to market changes and are better equipped to manage the complexities of a global, diverse workforce.?
On the other hand, companies stuck in traditional HR practices experience higher staff turnover, lower engagement, and struggle with diversity and inclusion and filling their jobs with the best people available. This not only affects their current performance but also their attractiveness to potential employees and their overall market position.
The Call to Action
The message is clear: the future belongs to those who embrace data-driven decision making in HR. The divide between the innovators and the traditionalists is growing, with significant implications for company success and employee well-being. For HR leaders hesitant to make the shift, the time to act is now . By adopting data analytics, AI, and ML, they can transform their departments into strategic entities that drive their companies forward.
The transition requires a commitment to learning, an openness to change, and a willingness to invest in new technologies. However, the rewards — a more engaged workforce, improved company performance, and a stronger competitive position — are well worth the effort. As the business world continues to evolve, the divide between data-driven innovators and traditionalists will only widen, making it clear which side HR leaders should choose to secure their company’s future.
Lou Adler?is the CEO and founder of Performance-based Hiring Learning Systems – a consulting and training firm helping recruiters and hiring managers around the world hire more outstanding and diverse leaders. Lou is the author of the Amazon top-10 best-seller, Hire With Your Head (John Wiley & Sons, 4th Edition, 2021), The Essential Guide for Hiring & Getting Hired (Workbench Media, 2013) and LinkedIn Learning’s Performance-based Hiring video training programs. Make sure you check out his Hire with Your Head Virtual Book Club on how to ChatGPT to find and hire more outstanding talent.?
CXO Relationship Manager
8 个月thank you so much for sharing. it's Great article and I agree this is a concern.
Software Quality assurance|Jira|Cypress
8 个月This is a great
Director en GRUPO MASCHWITZ Hn - RRHH
8 个月The insight might be: use tech tools but don′t loose the human touch. Action instead of reaction.
Recruiter IT Manager - Human Resources Consultant
8 个月We need to understand this tecnology to approach the best of our área., we work with people minds and feelings, we could get in the advantages of It IA AND ML without lost the human contact.
Admin Asst II, Compliance Team
8 个月While I see the potential benefits to incorporating AI into HR functions, I have concerns that this removes the human element in situations where compassion needs to be exercised. I agree that we all bring our own human perspective into our roles, which can lead to poor decision-making at times; however, in situations like FMLA where employees are experiencing a loss or going through a difficult time, there is still a time and place for understanding and working with an employee. AI runs the risk of treating our employees even more like a number, and runs the risk of losing the personal touch in everyday situations; which I fear could also lead to poor morale.