The Evolving Landscape of Self-Regulation in the Voluntary Carbon Market

The voluntary carbon market (VCM) has for a long time faced concerns about fragmentation and lack of transparency. Accusations of greenwashing and uncertainty over the environmental impact of carbon offsets have hampered its effectiveness in combating climate change. However, a self-regulation movement driven by market participants is taking root.

This article explores how the VCM is building robustness and integrity through various self-regulatory measures, collaborations and actions.

?

Understanding Self-Regulation

Self-regulation occurs when an industry establishes its own standards and practices that promote trust and transparency. It doesn't involve direct government oversight but relies on collaboration between key market players. Similar to the Advertising Self-Regulatory Council (ASRC) in the US or International Chamber of Commerce in the UK, these entities offer guidance and set standards without imposing regulation, legislation or penalties on non-compliant actors. While self-regulation allows for quicker responses to emerging issues than government regulation, enforcement capabilities are limited. Let's delve into how the VCM is embracing this approach.

?

Collaboration Over Competition

The VCM relies on a network of independent standard-setting organisations with established methodologies for project certification and emissions verification. All standard setters share the goal of enhancing transparency and integrity in the VCM's carbon credits. Recently, a significant increase in collaboration has emerged including the formation of the End-to-End Integrity Framework – representing over 3,000 projects and 2.5 billion credits - and the co-development of standards by VCMI and ICVCM. By working together to promote consistency and simplify market navigation, standard setters are fostering a more credible and efficient environment.

This collaboration provides much-needed governance and oversight for unregulated markets to function effectively.? It fosters a neutral environment where organisations don't have to choose sides and companies avoid getting caught in political games.

?

Increased Scrutiny and Institutional Engagement

The involvement of heavyweight institutions like the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in developing climate disclosures for carbon credits adds another layer of accountability. This engagement signals growing recognition of the market's potential and pushes for responsible practices.

The European Union's updated climate targets of a 90% net emissions reduction commitment by 2040 further endorse carbon markets. This policy prioritises both carbon reduction and removal technologies. Additionally, the World Economic Forum acknowledges the urgency of reducing emissions, protecting ecosystems and deploying carbon removal technologies.

At COP28, influential figures like World Bank President Ajay Banga and US Climate Envoy John Kerry endorsed the VCM. Kerry expressed his belief in the power of carbon markets to drive climate action. The US commodities regulator, CFTC, also supported the Voluntary Carbon Market by issuing proposed guidance.

Increased focus from these influential actors necessitates the highest levels of transparency and robustness within the VCM, leaving less room for error. With major player backing, the market needs to demonstrate its credibility.

?

VCM Credits and Corporate Net Zero Programs

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) recently announced the inclusion of carbon credits in their Corporate Net Zero standard. The decision to include Scope 3 emissions (indirect emissions) in the validation process creates a critical demand shift and further strengthens quality oversight.

Considering that SBTi-approved pledges cover a significant portion of global GDP (92%) and emissions (88%), the inclusion of carbon credits provides organisations with greater confidence in their use and increases scrutiny on quality and reporting transparency. BNEF estimates the market could reach a value of $1.1 trillion by 2050, up from $2 billion today. As companies seek to offset Scope 3 emissions, prioritising high-quality offsets becomes crucial, incentivising project developers to deliver measurable environmental benefits.

?

Global and Local Involvement in the VCM

Article 6 of the Paris Agreement establishes a framework for a more robust international carbon offsetting system. It lays the groundwork for standardised methodologies and global verification processes.

As a key outcome of COP26 agreements, Article 6 functions as a framework for a standardised approach to carbon credit trading and fosters international cooperation. It aims to build a centralised global carbon market where nations can reliably trade voluntary carbon credits. COP28 saw significant progress, including establishing a clear accounting framework to avoid double counting. Negotiations are ongoing to finalise specifics within the framework (such as Article 6.2 and 6.4). Market participants hope COP29 might be the event where the process is agreed, and implementation can begin.

While not formal regulation, Article 6 provides a strong international framework for countries and companies navigating carbon markets. Backed by the UNFCCC, the rules are supported by many leading global NGOs. According to the World Bank, carbon trading could facilitate the removal of 50% more emissions by 2030. Article 6 encourages voluntary cooperation between nations to achieve their NDCs and foster greater transparency across the sector.

?

A Single Set of Widely Accepted Standards

The Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market (ICVCM) has taken a significant step towards self-regulation with the introduction of their Core Carbon Principles (CCPs). These CCPs function as a comprehensive assessment tool, providing independent verification of a carbon credit's integrity within the voluntary market.

Encompassing ten science-based principles, the CCPs act as a rigorous benchmark for identifying high-quality credits. These credits demonstrably contribute to verifiable reductions and removals of emissions. By adhering to these principles, project developers can ensure their credits meet the most stringent standards for transparency, environmental impact and sustainable development.

Consequently, the CCP label serves as a trusted symbol for buyers. It allows them to confidently invest in carbon mitigation efforts with a clear demonstration of contribution towards achieving global climate goals.

?

Harnessing Technology for Self-Regulation

Data and Artificial Intelligence (AI) are emerging as powerful tools for self-regulation within the VCM. These technologies contribute to a more credible and impactful market by enhancing transparency, accountability and project design. Ultimately, this further drives the market towards self-regulation and delivers greater environmental benefits.

Examples include the utilisation of satellite imagery and technology, AI and blockchain.? These advancements offer deeper insights into project analysis, selection and efficacy. Additionally, they enable more robust monitoring, which strengthens transparency and eliminates opportunities for manipulation or abuse.

?

While the VCM isn't yet fully self-regulated, it has demonstrated its ability to adapt and address existing shortcomings. The continued focus to improve integrity and efficiency builds greater confidence and engagement within the market.

As the need for carbon reduction and removal intensifies in the face of rising temperatures and escalating climate disasters, the demand for stronger governance and quality will inevitably rise as well. While this may ultimately culminate in partial or full regulation of the sector, the ongoing development of self-regulation measures, like those outlined above, will continue to build trust and reliability in the market with the critical objective of averting a climate catastrophe.