The evolution of knowledge from the 21st century. Compendium

Incidentally, on a shelf in a spa bookstore, I discovered a copy that caught my attention from the back of a row of books on display, which had colorful and resonant covers at first glance. However, a discreet colored copy of plain (raw) paper, without drawings or figures other than a title in not very bright red letters, aroused my curiosity strongly enough to move the colorful copies from the front of the shelf and take the modest and discreet book of around 500 pages, which was titled “Sapiens”. From animals to gods.

Its author, unknown to me until then: Yuval Noah Harari and the synopsis on the back cover, directly forced me to buy it and anxiously open its pages. Something told me that my intuition would lead me on the right path in this reading choice. That's what I'm working on and I predict that it will be a good reference for the material that I am beginning to prepare to share in the circle in which I move.

I am tempted (nobility obliges) to use a temporal and factual division made by the author of the aforementioned book, which seemed imperative to me to take advantage of, given the coincidence of conceptual and evolutionary structuring with the person who writes these modest lines, beyond the specific development of his global content.

I will then proceed to begin my “thought with a free pen” with this sequence of events in humanity described in Harari's work.

The author of the work distributes the evolution of humanity in periods marked by Revolutions: The Cognitive Revolution, The Agricultural Revolution, The Social Revolution (By Harari described as unification of humanity) and The Scientific Revolution.

Knowledge has grown in crescendo while technology has done so almost autonomously.

Today the former seems to have come to have a horizontal asymptotic behavior in the most everyday aspects of science, while technology together with Artificial Intelligence (AI) seem to attack the execution of tasks and actions common to human activity, by style of everyday and domestic services, as well as sophisticated and risky actions through autonomous manipulation, without generating de novo knowledge...

We have already talked about this particular behavior that we observe in the evolution of scientific and technological knowledge, while the rest of human knowledge, which encompasses the fields of philosophy, arts and theology, are undergoing a similar process, based on the presence and monitoring currents of thought and aesthetic/ethical styles.

Harari's analysis of the evolution of our species and its qualitative departure from the rest of the species of the Hominidae family and from its own species without related genetic changes (in these in particular), means that we have an observation lens and a base logic to understand some “why” and “how” of such changes, with their impact on the absolute dominance of the planet and the evolutionary behaviors of the species since the last 30,000 years, without ceasing to consider this process as no less a contributor to the extinction of their “brothers” of the hominidae family, with whom they lived, like Neanderthal.

A substantial change in the mutations that randomly affected Homo sapiens sapiens that generated a redistribution of neuronal networks whose functional result was functional and non-genetic capacity to develop symbolic and conceptual language, where much more was done than warning about a risk or a condition of benefit for the clan, but rather going beyond and considering concomitant and correlative possibilities; make conjectures, all based on the capacity for abstraction and definition of objects and events that do not have a concrete physical existence. This can extend to religion, magical thinking, negotiations and commerce; rational conjectures and logical constructions (syllogisms applicable to imaginary, theoretical situations, problem solving and abstract musings) political, cultural, sports, religious and entertainment endeavors and organizations that exist today.

All of this combined, without the intervention of DNA in the generation, transmission and collective storage of information, made what the author cited today (Yuval Noah Harari) called the Cognitive Revolution, which occurred in our species 17,000 years ago, despite the fact that the species had existed for a long time. However, something triggered this change that represented a turning point in the evolution of animal species and the world as it had appeared until then, because Homo sapiens sapiens would modify it and affect everything from then on.

It is here where I found the fascination of an unexpected discovery in this magnificent author who, more than inspiration, produced in the person who writes these lines, a kind of positive reinforcement of the way of thinking and contemplating the world.

The enhancing effect of the synergy and organizational capacity of large groups of individuals in pursuit of common action (marcor the difference in the effectiveness and efficiency of actions) as well as that of learning and transmitting knowledge de novo to their group mates, which allowed them a formidable and unprecedented capacity for adaptation and versatility associated with proactivity that earned them total domination of the planet. .

Based on this, we then start from a starting line in which the natural condition and structure of the human being from then on is the same as today.

Analyzing the living conditions of Homo sapiens before and after the beginning of the “cognitive revolution”, we can infer that their capacity to adapt and modify the environment even when to be continue Being a hunter/gatherer, they allowed each individual to develop the skills to manufacture tools, weapons, devise strategies and analytically observe their immediate environment, with the ability to transmit the information and conclusions generated to their clan mates, shared knowledge that interacted with the other members who contributed theirs in a kind of synergistic combination that resulted in a collective knowledge that was more important and powerful than that of each individual separately or that of each one added in a linear manner. Collective knowledge would grow exponentially, making qualitative leaps that improved as the number of individuals in the group increased and exceeded what was possible before the cognitive revolution..

It seems that this is the key to the success of the effects of the cognitive revolution created by the new ability to functionally organize pre-existing brain neural networks, converting what we have already mentioned many times in our past writings: “hardware is software.”

With this precept that apparently could coincide with that of the reference author, we could explain some behaviors of the societies and associations of many individuals today and in history.

We can also infer that any of those individuals would be capable of learning what one does today and perhaps much more, if we consider that each one at that time had to have knowledge of such breadth and universality through which they could propose and execute survival strategies. and conquest never before achieved by any other animal species.

The vast majority of the cognitive challenges to which sapiens were exposed at that time far exceed the capabilities of current sapiens and if we extrapolate them and we will exchange locations and times, perhaps the current ones would succumb.

The evolutionary curve in terms of environmental achievements and conquest of territory, and dominance over other sapiens species, describes an exponential behavior and the achievements are gained throughout history, stages arranged in orders of magnitude in ascending order instead of linear cumulative summation.

The result was that the accumulated knowledge of organized human groups, which have become a society, far exceeds the capacity for learning and accumulation of knowledge at the level of gene banks and collective generational environmental learning, which lasts as long as each period lasts. Sapiens, on the other hand, not only accumulates collective knowledge in its own generation, but also invented external physical and now virtual storage media that allow reciprocal transfer between groups and the perpetuation of knowledge over time.

Sapiens successively invented writing, libraries, and active teaching mechanisms (universities), until they ended up with digital information, which is leading today to Artificial Intelligence.

The fundamental and differential thing was that through global articulated language (conceptual, emotional and descriptive), it has allowed sapiens to be able to think and express something that can be read and interpreted by other sapiens, in another time and another place.

The accumulation of knowledge was of such magnitude that today, it could be said that no human would be able to individually encompass all human knowledge.

The sources of information and the past cognitive levels act as launching bases to ascend to the next stratum at least one order of magnitude distant from the immediately lower or previous one.

I tend to use the conceptual tool of “Mountaineer's Nail” a lot to define cognitive starting points; However, given the exponential behavior of the cognitive evolution of organized human groups (exponential growth in quadratic and non-linear intervals), it disables this type of metaphor, which is better represented by “launch base”.

But knowledge is not by any means a mere accumulation of data and information, nor its processing. Just as Intelligence is not only the processing of said information.

Intelligence is usually an unconscious function, which can be modulated and optimized from consciousness. On the other hand, knowledge is clearly conscious, properly human and encompasses not only intelligence, information, reflective consciousness and the capacity for abstract conceptualization, but also encompasses aesthetic, sensual, artistic, philosophical and theological knowledge.

We could infer that: It is possible to achieve Artificial Intelligence, but it is not possible to generate artificial knowledge. This is on behalf of the person who writes these lines and is their absolute intellectual responsibility.

The agricultural revolution

Once the first (cognitive) revolution developed, Homo sapiens became more sedentary and domesticated animals and plants, with permanent settlement, based on agriculture as a way of life and evolution.

Although the sedentary system favored the development of culture and society, it also generated diseases, some weaknesses and conditions of individual versatility that are based above all on living in an environment that generates a “comfort zone.”

Sapiens would be forced from then on to learn and live based on the maintenance of the new conditions that agricultural life demands, namely: maintenance of crops, increase in population derived from the supply ad libitum (relatively) of food. and local environmental conditions promoted by “abundance”, to the detriment of the decrease in food variety. However, this pseudo abundance forced the consideration of events in the future (taking into account observations of climatic and seasonal variations, pests and other factors that relativize abundance).

Consequently, there was an exponential increase in the population due to the stabilization of the modified environment around the food and protection demands offered by sedentarization.

The new way of life and organization of human groups led to the need for learning about the management and administration of much larger groups, intra and extra-societal, as well as trade, defense and protection of crops and their products, among a universe of factors, unnecessary until the moment of the “agricultural revolution”

This comfort zone, based on the maxim of “function makes the organ” makes each individual and groups of them progressively dedicate themselves and learn to learn activities and functions linked to intangible objects such as businesses, institutions, commerce, cultural centers. and artistic, activities and political institutions that have generated a few thousand years later.

The appearance of written language, at first partial (referring only to numerical and mathematical matters) and later global (encompassing emotions, stories, stories and reflections), catalyzed the process of change of humanity that would no longer have a return.

A new environment that we have called Meta environment Occupied by Meta parthenogenetic individuals that behave as instinctive, irrational and territorial beings that house human beings in homogeneous communities but dotted with personal individuality, developed more or less freely depending on the “nature” of the social group or society considered (meta individual). We'll talk later about this.

The versatility of the hunter-gatherer sapiens remains above that of the settled farmer sapiens. However, the latter have progressed more and are the ones that currently predominate and make up modern humanity.

The knowledge and learning carried out by the members of agricultural societies become increasingly discreet and compartmentalized, despite the fact that the total amount of societal knowledge is sidereal? greater than the total amount of the hunter/gatherer sapiens.

Currently, the hunter/gatherer sapiens mode is permissible by the overwhelming majority of agricultural society; despite the presence of this immersed and diffused in it.

Comparative evolution of the capabilities of sapiens individuals vs. societies

The first change established between both sapiens (hunter/gatherer and farmer) is that the former adapts knowledgeably and effectively to the environment, making the best of it and expanding, gaining new territories and knowledge.

The sapiens farmer establishes himself and begins from the beginning to modify and dominate the natural environment, generating his own favorable and relatively predictable environment, at the expense of which he will live and prosper. On the other hand, its dependence on monocultures will begin, raising animals that in turn will suffer from two paradoxical processes (through zootechnics, their productive characteristics will improve for human interests, but natural adaptive abilities will decrease due to the loss of rusticity that the domestication generates in their populations {something similar happens in sedentary humans}). Consequently, the appearance of parasitic, infectious, nutritional and genetic diseases will be a factor of progressive relevance and demanding increasing dedication on the part of societies.

The action and effect of hunter/gatherer sapiens, immersed and absorbed by modern agricultural society, generates a catalyzation of processes that trigger evolution within society and motivates its evolutionary progression. Perhaps an example of this is the presence and action of entrepreneurial contingents, scientific and technological development groups, military and geopolitical strategy groups, as well as leaders of local policy groups.

The other part of the paradox of humanity after the agricultural revolution is that the “security of food production” requires increasingly intense and permanent care to maintain the exponentially increasing level of demand that comes as a corollary of the exponential growth of the human population as a result of the sedentarization and homogenization of the environment that is now controlled but demanding attention and prevention to alleviate future natural events such as climatic and biological cycles, pests and protection of other human groups with expansive goals.

The situation of control over the environment by humanity generates a meta-environment per se that conditions the entire life of said humanity, now subject to the demands of its own environment, motivating new activities and learning linked to immaterial areas that are link with negotiation, commerce, property, territorial power, culture and collective knowledge that will be stored in extra-individual physical media whose magnitude exceeds the sum of all the “knowledge” of each individual belonging to society.

Likewise, the fractionation and categorization of societies into ranks and levels of power and responsibilities will be generated, according to paradigms linked to a collective imaginary that transcends the individuals of society (they can be theological, ethical, ideals, Magna Cards and constitutions).

These levels are strengthened and applied thanks to the qualitative impact that the appearance of global or total writing has allowed as a tool for the transmission of thought and knowledge beyond the generations.

At this stage, humanity has dominated and completely encompassed the biosphere and from then on, its life will be governed by new laws, which while still being natural, are specific to the actions of the only surviving species of the entire family.

The "Meta environments", the "Meta individuals” and the human beings who are part of their groups, communities and conglomerates will be subjected to codes of life and existence hitherto not seen in other animal species or other kingdoms.

It is then time to recapitulate, shuffle and deal cards again in a game that takes place at the same table as before, but with rules that exclude the usual players.

The evolution of knowledge and dual human behavior at the individual and societal levels

An apparent action of "giving ground" of nature becomes evident in the face of the actions of the new human now organized in more numerous, diverse social groups and with internal structures from which specific functions of harmonious functioning are derived, in pursuit of maintaining an environment created by this new humanity “now subject to its rules”

Man now has control over his environment and establishes the rules of the game for the living beings that now cohabit with him. This new artificial environment will be inhabited by beings that from now on we will call domesticated beings (both plants and animals). ).

Now the Human owns and dominates extensive areas of domesticated land that houses plants that produce food and keeps safe animals that live and grow based on his needs, both to be food and to perform work, and other functions such as defense, company. and entertainment. Among the domesticated species, it is worth highlighting the dog (Canis lupus familiaris); species that agreed with Man and with which a kind of commensalism was built that became a symbiosis to which was added a second species, the domestic cat (Felis catus), which in a much more asymmetrical way, conquered the affections of humans in various senses (some good and affectionate and others as an object of fetishism and demonic fantasies).

With the control of the land and the animals, comes the implicit demand for protection and fight against factors corollary to this new natural situation, such as adaptation of parasites to a new supply of hosts, more favorable living conditions for animals that are losing rusticity and natural adaptability due to selection pressure in search of phenotypes favorable to human interests and not those natural to the species itself.

The case of vegetables, which go from being simple isolated weeds to widely extended monocultures and improved growth conditions at the expense of aggressive combat against other plants and homogenizing the genetic load of the population with the consequent decrease in variability and adaptability, as well as as loss of rusticity.

What is now presented as a favorable environment for the sedentarization of Man and the favored growth of plants and animals in their orbit of dominance, begins to demand more and more dedication and organization to keep these populations and their predators safe and under control. natural even until their extinction, which is not free for the general long-term health of everyone: Humans, plants and animals.

Without prejudice to this, the notions of power, territoriality, dominance and categorization of the human population that start from the defense of the collective properties of other expanding human groups that will try to conquer them or vice versa, lead in the short term to the generation of methods of internal organization of the groups and in the delegation of functions, responsibilities and with it, the creation of bureaucracy.

As a direct consequence, the appearance of written language, initially partial, numerical and mathematical, in the times of the Sumerians in Middle Eastern Mesopotamia 3500 BC, arose as an adaptive need to the new demand of the groups to organize and account for crops and its internal and external negotiation with other civilizations.

This phenomenon can be observed more or less homogeneously and synchronously in various civilizations distributed on the planet that, without any contact or communication with each other, were generating their own codices. (Egyptians, Mayans, Qin Dynasty China).

Written language is then an evolutionary function that in turn was perfected in a short time into total written language, which included not only calculation, but also concepts, abstract thoughts and emotions (the latter, an unprecedented factor until that moment).

With the combination of sedentarization, control of crops and their effects seasonal and climatic among others, together with the total language, the projection of

a dimension hitherto not assumed and exclusive to the current human species: the concept of the future.

Man was immersed in a new dimension from which he will never leave: living his life and that of his organizations based on future time.

This is not simply a play on words, since in reality its projective capacity conditions each action from its first formative processes in childhood until death ("and beyond"...)

Prospecting the future and then: past and present, exacerbates the ability to observe the universe and begins to learn about astronomy, about climate, animal and plant behavior; and about himself.

Here something that until now was too risky to develop begins to have a real space: magical thinking in all its expression; emotionality, theologically developed and organized religion, collective fantasy, art, leisure and entertainment, Music, as an expression that until today relates functionally, biologically and experientially to each stage of human development and its neural structures linked to its implementation. on going.

It is (in the modest opinion of the writer of these lines) that Music is the essence and synopsis of the evolutionary sensory neural and cognitive network of humanity.

Music is to the universe, like the sense of smell is to the animal kingdom:"is the same thing”...

From systematic observation, the ability to generate concepts and phenomenologically associate the events of the world that surrounds Man progressively emerged. Using all their senses and new capacities for understanding and horizontal transmission at first and then vertically thanks to the total written language, the process of generating Universal collective knowledge which at this point transcends individual capabilities and thrives almost automatically within social groups.

However, this new adaptive aptitude of Man is not common to all members of society. Only a minority of its individuals is in the capacity and condition to achieve this status of wisdom, either by arbitrary social selection, defined by the creation of castes, classes or categories, or by the living conditions of each subgroup that facilitate or hinder the generation of deeper knowledge.

There is an unwritten rule, which determines that those who are linked to the physical maintenance of the bases of society's food system, do not have the time or the conditions and/or motivations to access knowledge of another category, which is based on objectifying immaterial, theoretical things and events, sometimes non-existent or not evident in the eyes of any individual. (Abstract thinking).

This is a situation that has naturally occurred since the creation of societies and is a natural behavior; It doesn't have to be fair or unfair, it just is.

Notwithstanding the above, the generation of knowledge tends to spread within society and horizontal transfer mechanisms develop favorably throughout history. The greater the number of individuals dedicated to knowing, the greater the collective knowledge there will be and the more transcendent it will be, even surpassing the individuals who generated it.

As a consequence and already in ancient Athens, which housed the Macedonian Aristotle, where he created the Lyceum, referring to the palace dedicated to Apollo Lyceus in Athens created the first educational institutions aimed at transferring and generating new knowledge and made possible the exponential development of disciplines such as philosophy, mathematics, and factual sciences (physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy and medicine).

Knowledge was able to make a great qualitative leap in this period (called classical) and literally opened a new universe for humanity.

From this moment on, the wise men of new generations receive past knowledge and generate their own, starting from the previous ones as from a launching platform for a jet propulsion rocket, which transfers them to strata located at one or more orders of magnitude of the starting point, generating exponential behavior.

Its quadratic and non-linear growth was of such a nature that it remained per se in a kind of bubble separated from the linear growth of the rest of the societies, on which from time to time it poured out some technical or scientific advance that facilitated the daily life of those.

Humanity behaved as a single individual composed of a much larger number of members (like cells in a complex multicellular organism) that form a functional unit, but that have very different variations and functionalities in their internal connection, despite their common origin.

In its scholarly core, knowledge is generated that grows and evolves, but the rest of the body develops at the wrong time and generates other attitudes and experiences, as could happen with a child who goes through adolescence (in modern times) where their organism and a priori behavior respond more instantly to the physical, hormonal and social tendencies of their peers, to form groups of belonging and identity, while they receive training, which is not always homogeneously processed or with the same results, but at the same time finally, when one reaches adulthood, both come together (formative experiences and empirical experiences) to form a mature person with a characteristic of insertion into their specific society, which gives them a role in it.

As a cartoon example, the largest contingent of humanity's generated and accumulated knowledge occurred 2,500 years ago; However, it was not until the 11th century that the fork was invented. …

The incorporation of knowledge by society was done in a linear manner throughout history, with wars being the main catalysts of specific accelerations that led to the implementation of new discoveries.

Thus we go from the classical age of antiquity that began with the Sumerians and culminates with the Greco-Roman world to the Middle Ages, to re-emerge with great emphasis on the Renaissance from the 16th century onwards, where a true explosion of talent and erudition was seen both in science and in philosophy and the arts.

From then on, it was technology and technological knowledge that progressively gained ground to give rise to the respective industrial revolutions, whose evolution continued exponentially until today when we witness the IV industrial revolution, with the development of Artificial Intelligence as the star of the new scenario of human adventures.

What has happened so far with collective and individual knowledge, enlightenment and the ability to use the results of collective knowledge through technological advancement?

?Humanity has been expanding according to the areas of settlement and the increasingly complex organization of the common societal and productive structures, which make up the populated centers, which become references for other centers and poles of communication with those still distant and dissimilar but they have common development thrusts and certainly a common and unifying element at the same time: trade together with the concept of money or universal exchange currency.

The different human groups, from now on civilizations, show similar behavior towards their internal organizations and a global vision towards the outside that is carried out through lenses common to all in terms of their evolutionary macrostructure, which is summarized in religions such as general regulatory frameworks for unifying rules of coexistence and collective action.

Religions that have gone from polytheistic animist styles to culminate in monotheistic and naturalistic ones have had similar behaviors and similar dawns responding to a certain synchrony that has nothing to do with communication between civilizations nor with the respective entelechies of divinities.

Evolutionary processes occur in all distant and unconnected human settlements with temporal and evolutionary synchrony, which although with different contents, languages, gods and methods, all play their music under the same rules of harmony and tempo, varying the melody and the rhythm in its natural way.

This situation is a sine qua non condition for understanding between civilizations when it is time for them to meet.

These encounters will occur throughout history and can take various forms, although violence, conquest and submission is the rule. However, the cultures of the subjugated and the conquerors will always be mixed in a new Creole or hybrid culture that will be different from each of the originals although it maintains typical features of the respective ancestral ones. This cultural evolution will be independent of that of the individuals that form their societies and grow autonomously, using the members as vectors of propagation and dynamic perpetuation between generations.

Cultures behave as collective meta-behaviors that evolve independently of the generations of individual members of society who incorporate or even insert changes in it without being aware of such action; changes that will be seen when, after three or four generations, the members of these new societies apply or execute the inserted customs and then pass into the collective consciousness of their heritage and legacy.

As with knowledge, each generation starts from a new launching base where the things “known/learned” will be the new starting point, without questioning their origin or past processes and will start in search of new knowledge linked to the curiosity of the new generation (science, philosophy and theology) or the need for application to solve a given situation (technology). During this process, another aptitude inherent exclusively to the human species, art, will account for the evolution of the results that the aforementioned disciplines exert on societies and their members in a kind of unconscious holistic summary of supreme meta-instinct, where “the thing itself” is perceived and expressed in a sensual, emotional, hermeneutic, global and contemplative way.

While societies evolve at their natural pace and interact with others, generating a constant renewal of the cultural heritage of each one, human beings, citizens, individual members of said societies are organized, bureaucratized and autonomous in terms of their functioning and actions outward. (with other societies) and inwards, regulating the coexistence of its individual members, under general and universal rules that everyone must abide by, which may be modified through regulatory mechanisms such as government systems that cover a wide spectrum from authoritarianism, autocracies, totalitarianism. democratic and democratic republican systems).

The ranges of individual freedom and the consequent individual development will vary according to the laxity with which the meta-environment and the meta-individual (society) allow based on their operational nature. The categorization of citizens will be more or less disguised or moderate but it exists in all systems and varies from subjects, to prominent citizens, through slaves, hostages, conquered enemies and allies. This is a rule more or less repeated throughout history and civilizations around the world regardless of their existing or non-existing intercommunications.

Apparently, there is a paradox, in which society (a product of humanity) takes on a “life of its own” and evolves according to its own rules and rhythm, in parallel with the individual evolution of its individual members (citizens). These will have different developments from each other, their own activities that respond to the nature of their aptitudes and goals, as well as the needs and existing markets for their development, which will exert more or less lax pressure depending on the internal freedom that is managed and allowed. the Meta Individual which is the Society, immersed in turn in a Meta Environment apocryphal to the original natural one, in which each Meta individual must subsist, progress and adapt, competing with other Meta individuals with similar characteristics who fight to survive in the same way. .

The human being then begins to live in two parallel worlds: one is the individual world in which training resources are developed to achieve their desires, goals and objectives with a more or less degree of freedom. On the other hand, in parallel, it lives inserted in the anatomy of a Meta Individual in the style of a giant jellyfish, where each cell specialized in a different function but all under the umbrella of the great jellyfish, work to fulfill the functionality of the collective mega being. that houses and governs them.

There is also another parallel: At one extreme, societies have irrational behavior, governed by a Meta Instinct that mobilizes them, like any colony of collective insects or mycelium of a fungus, which instinctively competes with similar others to obtain supremacy and survive. At the other extreme and in parallel, we have human beings, Citizens, members of these meta individuals, who are rational, free creators by nature and independent with a socializing vocation to achieve common objectives in small groups, who will seek to compete with similar others who will fight for the same objectives and that will develop first within the same Meta individual (society of origin) and then they will be able to extend said fight outside of it in other meta individuals, either against them (on behalf of their own) or introducing and being assimilated by them. There will be others who interact with several of these Metaindividuals in a multi-univocal manner, generating bridges and binding ties with the opening of opportunities for members of each of them.the meta individuals involved.

The existence and behavior of individuals per se as beings belonging to a biological species (Homo sapiens, sapiens), shows an evolutionary takeoff of specific genetic drift that became per se an exponential development of behaviors and accumulation of extra-biological knowledge (articulated language through) that allowed this type of surviving animal to dominate the natural environment and form a new environment, which we call Meta environment with new members (Meta individuals: Societies) that make up a concomitant apocryphal ecosystem but that will ultimately end up responding to the same natural laws as the pre-existing or ever-ubiquitous ecosystems on the planet.

The times and mechanisms of development of each system (the meta-environment and that of the individual/social human being in small groups) will be divergent, will go at different speeds and will have its own and different rhythms. The citizens who are members of the meta individuals, must adapt to the conditions generated by the larger organism and its internal and external environment.

The evolutions and actions of the meta-individuals will be instinctive, irrational and even unconscious, despite being based on groups and collective operational organizations that show the same nature.

However, within individuals, there will be two types: some will be creative, restless, free in their way of thinking and acting, contributing new knowledge to their environment or the enormous variety of obvious riches that the human species has and which need not be mentioned. .

There will be others who, on the other hand, will submit to the implicit and explicit norms and conditions of the larger meta-individual (society), adapt to its rules and live according to them, forming part of a productive and cultural system deployed by society in who were born and grew, without making major contributions that differ qualitatively from the general ones of their group or sector of activity, forming a homogeneous body with functional organs to the macro system that is the meta-individual from which they take their identity and from which they execute their laws and moral/ethical standards.

This behavioral and cognitive dichotomy affects the actions of the entire system and its interrelation with other systems when sharing a Meta ecosystem.

As a consequence of this dichotomy, the presence and actions of active and creative minorities emerge from the beginning, generating the advance line of the entire society, although they are not accompanied in their own times. Many times these minorities will create knowledge that is transmitted in the same subliminal minority way out of sight of the rest although not hidden. This knowledge remains entrenched as intergenerational legacies while their societies move at very different rhythms and it will not be them, but the future ones, that develop these “cognitive spores” frozen in time and space.

?

State of the evolution of human knowledge in the 21st century

“Although human knowledge continues to grow, considered as a scientific/technological society and not as a sum of individuals, these can be grouped or perhaps embraced by different social subgroups that interact in a Meta Ecosystem that functions independently of intimate, creative and free, individuals …

This is the procedural premise from which we start in this reflection, to try to interpret the behavior of Man and Humanity as different biunivocal entities although sometimes asymmetrical.

We depart from; and we evoke the event of the Agricultural Revolution described by Yuval Noah Harari, in his work “Sapiens. From animals to gods.?

In this instance of the evolution of humanity, after having generated the qualitative leap of genetic drift that culminated in the Cognitive Revolution and determined the turning point from which the species separates itself from all other species of living beings on the planet. The second non-genetic evolutionary instance that the agricultural revolution implies begins the era of sedentarization, domestication of plants and animals and the modification of the environment, which will demand, for its part, constant attention, projection in time, apprehension of knowledge arising from the systematic observation of climate, pests, animal and plant behaviors, as well as negotiation, internal administration and extra group of power, calculation and bureaucracy.

All of these seem like too many inputs to be explained in a single paragraph, but little by little they will be elucidated, as with the description of processes, the need for each of them to exist becomes evident.

First of all:

What did the agricultural revolution and environmental modification imply?

The first consequence is sedentary lifestyle. With it, new patterns of behavior and group organization emerge, which become more complex as the organization itself sedentarization from a controlled environment promotes population growth, which will manifest itself exponentially. Then, the old rules of coexistence and collaboration of groups of up to 150 individuals in the post-cognitive revolution Collector/Hunter Man will become obsolete. The growing number of group members will require the specialization of activities to address situations of maintenance of the modified environment that will be much more complex than the natural environment in which the gatherer/hunter groups moved. In this conceptual dimer made up of gatherer/hunter groups and sedentary farming groups, a dichotomy and attitudinal divergence of both components is presented. In the first case, each individual separated itself from its relatives on the biological scale thanks to the transformation that the functional structure of the brain generated without forming a new species but distancing itself from its Sapiens brothers:? Metacognitive revolution. Here then, each individual acquired or new knowledge with great versatility, which he could share with his group mates and synergize for coordinated actions, adapting effectively to the conditions that impressive in? the natural environment, successfully managing to spread throughout the world and dominate other species, including hominids such as Neanderthals, with whom they lived.

In short, each individual was wise and versatile to adapt to the environment that imposed its rules of the game.

In the case of a wise farmer, once he modified the environment, it became dependent on him; more complex and demanding, as it expanded.

While the individual who is part of sedentary groups also becomes dependent on the created and/or modified environment; It is also prey to new diseases that population growth implies, as well as limited nutrition from the point of view of variety, given by monocultures in large areas that ensure the abundance of food but not the variety of nutrients.

Domesticated plants and animals are progressively modified by human selection, allowing only those carriers of desirable characteristics for man to reproduce, but generally contrasted with the rusticity and versatility of animals and plants for survival, which brings about diseases in these, weaknesses and special care to protect them from predators or natural environmental conditions.

While the comfort and abundance of food increases linearly, the reproducibility of the human population does so geometrically with the consequence that the supply will be progressively and constantly less than the demand, just as the seasons and climate will mark periods of abundance and others of scarcity, human groups must dedicate their efforts to producing more in the benevolent seasons and store reserves for critical periods.

This adaptive response to the new modified environment generates a new fitness of man who does not share with other species: understand and act based on time. It is necessary, from this moment on, to have the ability to observe seasonal behavior of crops, the climate and their entire environment.

Projection into the future based on observation of the present and past became necessary. This new dimension of perception will be original and primordial in the zoological evolution of the planet.

Time management…This ability will indicate the journey of no return to human speciation.

So, it was necessary to create disciplines of new knowledge and techniques of climatology, astronomy, zootechnics, botany, to understand the cyclic processes of their crops and farm animals, their diseases, weaknesses of their natural predators to better protect them, since domestication becomes more vulnerable; all this without prejudice to the fact that other agricultural groups, in their ambition and need for expansion, may attack and destroy the previous ones.

All these emerging disciplines, for their part, have a common requirement: calculus and from now on, Mathematics.

Agricultural production in accordance with seasonality, supply and future projection of demands and needs, led to the administration of goods, surfaces and technology to be invented.

With time and good cognitive management of the group in general, after effective and efficient administration, the violent usurpation of assets began to be replaced by negotiation and commerce.

We have started with these topics in the previous paragraphs, for a strictly pragmatic matter, starting from objective needs and results in sight, but without prejudice to the fact that none of these activities would have been possible without the prior or concomitant existence of another own and exclusive aptitude. of Homo sapiens: articulated language, capable of generating temporal-spatial information in the group, phenomenology of the environment, conceptual assessment of things and abstract thinking where space is opened for magical thinking, mysticism and religiosity.

Having made the gatherer/hunter sapiens take off during the cognitive revolution, now, with the agricultural and sedentary sapiens, creator of complex human groups of exponentially larger dimensions, this aptitude attribute becomes a sine qua non condition, it is not possible to exercise any administrative function. organizational, negotiation, planning, war or trade or internal ordering of the organizational structure of human settlements that from now on we will call civilizations.

The capacity for negotiation and commerce is the sublimation of brute and hostile usurpation, through a modality of mutual comparison of advantages and disadvantages, strengths and weaknesses, all speaking in a language that, beyond formal differences, maintains a structural essence that allows the dialectical game.

This formidable capacity lacked only one thing to become the sovereign attitude of humanity: writing.

When between 3000 and 3300 BC in the Mesopotamia valley of the Middle East, the Sumerians began to carve out an accounting system to be able to calculate their agricultural production and storage, the ice of registry silence was broken.

This appearance of writing, like many attributions of human civilization in different parts of the world, occurred in a more or less similar way and in parallel, even when there was no knowledge of the existence of one civilization or another. It is then an attitude in some way driven by the emerging need and why not, by a design.genotypic/ phenotypic / environmental that predisposed to the creation of these unique powers in this species.

At first writing was only mathematical or more precisely arithmetic, but over time, civilizations created other ways to transmit data, sensations, evaluations, emotions and finally knowledge, making global or total writing. From this point, abstract thought is a hall or a niche where it can be sheltered, preserved and transmitted beyond space and time.

Collective global knowledge was gaining significance until it was soon much greater than the total singular knowledge of any individual and even the sum of all individuals. The possibility of generating libraries, study centers, centers of law administration and centers of power opened up. Bureaucracy appears on the scene in the human tragedy racket.

Societies become more complex, grow in size and expand.

Internally, its complexity requires administration methods, delegation of functions and therefore their specialization. Individuals begin to train to respond to specific requirements of subsectors of the internal organization of society, while the majority will dedicate themselves to the production and maintenance of crops and food that will sustain society as a whole, but they will not have the time nor the opportunity to aspire to do other tasks within the new organizational subgroups.

The sapiens gatherer/hunter must and manages to generate a deep knowledge of his environment, the animals and plants, climate behaviors and sources of resources to survive and expand, where all skills had to go through each individual so that with total cognitive and executive autonomy, he could exercise the act of adapting to the environment and surviving, achieving supremacy over his neighbors in the ecosystem.

In short: the individual is of high cognitive neuropsychic complexity and the environment is simpler and more natural, common to all species.

The sapiens farmer of the new sedentary civilization, on the other hand, needs to acquire specific knowledge for discrete activities within a thriving, demanding and autonomous organizational system in its evolution. These will have progressive and constant demands in efficiency, to the detriment of the knowledge inherent in food production or survival in the countryside, adaptation, manufacturing of equipment and weapons or searching for plants with medicinal action. The new sapiens starts from pre-existing collective knowledge and unconsciously takes it as a launching pad for its own expedition of knowledge collection and generation of specific specialized but discrete knowledge, which will form part of a large collective cognitive system.

Soon, thanks to language, global or total writing and the means of storage and administration of knowledge such as libraries, study centers and universities, humanity has been evolving on an exponential scale in its knowledge, mastery of nature and its power. general.

In short, civilization is more complex while the individual is more discrete and limited in his cognitive complexity.

In the historical/evolutionary facts of humanity, we can identify traces of the collector/hunter sapiens model dispersed throughout all civilized agricultural societies. We can see their representations in the subgroups of industrial, commercial, scientific and artistic entrepreneurial people and organizations. These generate new advanced knowledge in fields not common to the majority of the population but which in the end, from a generative minority, culminates in spilling over to the rest of society in goods, services or global technological advances that modify the lifestyle of everyone.

Without intending to interfere in areas outside our training and in order to roughly summarize the historical evolution of civilizations and humanity, we will try to establish two large segments in said evolution in order to present our perspective and vision of the subject of the evolution of knowledge. We expressly apologize for any omissions, inaccuracies or specific technical discrepancies that we may incur, but we expressly state the intention to avoid generating any epistemic disruption. We assume intellectual responsibility for our lines of thought expressed by freehand in the responsible exercise of freedom.

Clearing up our starting point, we will divide the evolution of humanity into two segments: the first that formally begins in the so-called agricultural revolution, with the sedentarization of man, modification of the environment and domestication of plants and animals, laying the foundations of organized civilization. The second part of the so-called Scientific Revolution, from which the notion of man's ignorance awakens the desire to know and know. Consequently, this desire for knowledge encourages them to innovate, conquer and expand their domains. From this moment on, the combination of concepts of knowledge associated with power is combined. This is when the Scientific Revolution and the awareness of ignorance on the part of humanity occurs; Socrates(470-399 BC).

This dimer (knowledge/power) is associated with the conquest and formation of empires that transcend the geographical and conceptual limits of dominion, placing humanity for the first time as the direct protagonist of its own actions with relative independence from extraneous or metaphysical factors such as mythology, religion, idealism, leaving free passage to Science as an effector and generator of more knowledge and power. This change meant a turning point in the evolution and behavior of civilizations that was absolutely new.

This turning point is why we consider two segments in humanity's evolution regarding knowledge and its management.

In the first segment, we find two unavoidable enclaves of exponential generation of knowledge again: the first is the classical period that begins in 500 BC and lasts until 400 AD. The second period, begun at the dawn of the 16th century, with the Renaissance, the period of Enlightenment and a new and colossal cognitive push for humanity arises. It is then where philosophy, mathematics and factual sciences begin their exponential development and the journey of growing and uninterrupted impact on the global world begins.

In this segment, exploration and discovery formed the figurehead of the ship of the development of European civilization; with such luck that it became dominant over the rest of the planet in the following centuries.

The constant and growing motivation of search accompanied by the awareness of ignorance, allowed a true explosion of new knowledge and power beyond known horizons. Conquest and dominion was the rule in every place on the planet that was discovered.?

For the first time, the concept of imperialism was no longer fulfilled solely by the sum of contiguous territories, but by the notion of global conquest associated with the new cognition of the universe under the control of this exploring civilization and eager for new achievements with no limit other than infinity.

During the course of the first segment arbitrarily defined by the writer of these lines, the empires added territories that they gained or lost by competing all under the same rules of war.

Of the great empires of antiquity, the Roman empire will be differentiated by its higher level of development and general knowledge, imposing its advanced style of military and political strategy that earned it absolute supremacy for 9 centuries and until the Renaissance, if we consider the ancient empire. Eastern Roman became the Byzantine Empire that lasted until 1412 when it was destroyed by the Ottoman Empire. During all these centuries, few qualitative advances or changes had occurred that had not already been imposed or created by the Romans. Their original superiority was maintained all the time and even those who finally defeated them did not differ from them in their methods, to the point that they were the school of new empires, two of which are in force in some way today under a diplomatically improved form. , which is Great Britain and Germany, having previously passed through Napoleon or Charlemagne during 10 centuries of learning.

In this enormous period, the role of science and knowledge was practically not taken into account by the military generals of the different empires; Inventions of specific weapons technologies were sporadically spilled out by some very brilliant (sometimes illiterate, but highly inventive) craftsmen they designed for specific purposes, such as the universal geniuses Archimedes (Syracuse, 287 BC - 212 AC) and Leonardo da Vinci (Anchiano Italy, 1452 - 1519).

The Chinese invented gunpowder around the 9th century, but they never used it for war purposes; it was the Europeans in the 13th century (1250) who used it for the first time, in an evolution that led to the invention of the first cannon in history. Schwarz Berthold (Germany, 1384).

War inventions are not linked directly with scientific knowledge, each remaining in its parallel and unconnected universe, with some exceptions that confirm the rule and with a greater participation of artisans who were precursors of technological development.

The wars are liberated on battlefields foreign to the fortunes of the cities of either side. In this sense, the military powers were more even and did not depend on the sizes of the societies but on the capabilities of their armies, so that the disputes were relatively equitable since the technologies were not differed too much to make differences beyond the strategies of their generals and field marshals, who were ultimately the ones who determined the success or failure of the war campaigns. Then, the cities and civilizations defended by one army or another will submit to the designs of the victor who would exercise his absolute power after the conquest.

At the end of the 18th century, the explosion of knowledge in the so-called century of light or enlightenment, was gaining ground in the fields of practical application. From science came the invention of the transformation of thermal energy into work and the first steam engine was invented. Originated to favor the work of coal mines, its usefulness for the movement of materials, people and animals was soon discovered and the first locomotives emerged in the “blink of time.”The Industrial Revolution It had its beginning in its first version. The transfer of steam technology to ships and large-scale overseas navigation was a fact; easier, cheaper, faster and more efficient than the wind. Bombs and cannons were transported on steamships and military trains, which became armored war tanks and later machines with internal combustion engines; and automobiles, ships and airplanes... A cascade of three industrial revolutions that became the IV and absolute industrial revolution -Current- in three centuries, achieved a transformation of humanity's own environment greater than all the centuries of its existence combined.

It is in the 20th century, where the second segment of human history of our analysis reaches its peak.

For the first time, there is awareness of the true impact that scientific knowledge has on previously unrelated fields and great efforts are proactively channeled to convergently link science with war development, giving the official start to the so-called Scientific revolution (Yubal Noah Harari. reference author taken in this analysis).

In the 20th century, science achieved the maximum possible power, having revolutionized the universes of power such as war, geographical and space exploration, medicine, natural sciences, industry, agriculture and global management of the environment and energy. .

The new dimer: Awareness of ignorance / Avidity to know, became a trihedral composed of Greed for knowledge/Power/Exploration.

At this point, humanity is already independent of the natural environment and determines according to its own and partial interests, the processes to which nature is subjected, with total freedom of action and great efficiency.

Although natural laws are immovable and immutable even in the face of the sui generis actions of the only living species capable of exerting side effects, the same on other living beings not directly linked to humanity and the environment are devastating and obviously take their toll on global society with effects such as those linked to global warming, to mention the most popular. However, global society persists in continuing to obtain energy resources and squeeze its scientific and technological talent to achieve more results favorable to human expansion beyond its a priori conceivable natural scope.

The human science disciplines such as economics and sociology describe crises and evolutions of the productive growth of societies and their multi-univocal links between them. They define needs for the generation of food that is always scarce for certain sectors of the planet and for the impoverishment of others, always measured according to parameters of modern lifestyles that are light years away from the original real natural basic needs of the species and the primitive communities. agriculture from which the humanity to which we belong emerged.

Consumer goods and services as well as a true universe of services are at a level of existence diametrically distant from the biological survival needs of human beings.

There is no lack of food for humanity, but rather homogeneous access of human beings to it, mediated by social, economic, religious, political and cultural situations.

The current vital goods for modern human beings and their societies are far from the basic needs of the species as such. Today, the vast majority of humans work, learn, and train to do discrete activities in a complex system of multiple actions that meet the “higher” cultural, consumer, leisure and entertainment, religious, artistic, and general well-being requirements. whose demand is often generated by the production and consumption system itself.

The needs of modern man are no longer related to the survival or expansion of the species, but are directly linked to the lifestyle of the respective societies to which they belong and all of them subject to a new environment that encompasses them and governs

There is a driving factor for the social behavior of the species that is determined by the lifestyles of civilization and we unconsciously adhere to it.

Today's modern society, which is experiencing its fourth industrial revolution, where biotechnology, bioinformatics; The technological fusion that led to artificial intelligence and machine learning now conditions the structure of societies in a large global conglomerate as a single large multifunctional society that is managed under global parameters that respect pre-existing societies in its internal organization. established in their cultural and religious bases such as Western, Asian (Chinese, Japanese), Hindu, Arab/Muslim; but all governed under the same scientific-technological guidelines that set the pace for the progress of all of humanity.

?

Extreme individual freedom: …

In the French Revolution (July 14, 1789); With the storming of the Bastille, not only was the absolute monarchy overthrown, but a new turning point was set in the evolution of humanity, which bounce back and even without intending it a priori, in the form of generation, distribution and management of the collective knowledge of societies.

From this moment on, the concept of "Freedom" was winning “Personality” in the French social collective first and progressively towards the rest of the world that less than three centuries later would be known as Western society.

Although the revolution was conceived, promoted and led by intellectuals of great political influence such as Robespierre, Marat and Danton ... The results at the population level in terms of immediate general behavior and during the first transition periods were of vandalism, of anarchic hordes that devastated everything in their path without stopping to make any value judgment about the opportunity to preserve or destroy previously existing general assets. The only and “totalitarian” premise was freedom, as equivalent to ungovernable and without limits. Similar behavior was observed less than two centuries later in the 1917 Russian Revolution.

Sooner or later, order should be restored and in fact it was, directed by the thinking heads who devised the respective resolutions that formed the governments and their respective cabinets and pyramids of power that affected, under the slogan of organizational order, the former subject masses, now citizens, to achieve a global harmonious coexistence.

The brand new status, with its ups and downs, led to the momentary restoration of the monarchy and later, to the apogee of the totalitarian governmental activity of Napoleon Bonaparte's government in his first campaign, until the founding of his neo-Napoleonic empire that could only be defeated by another empire (main apprentice of the Roman Empire) the British.

After these imperial debacles, France evolved within the framework of a liberal and open republic in which Liberty, with its “quasi-mystical personhood” would find the perfect refuge and cradle of splendor and development to spread to the entire world. However, today only a part of it can show the effects of its real and full exercise by its citizens.

With historical twists and turns, advances and failures of large social blocks and entire societies, the world was divided into two large conceptual blocks from the organizational point of view of knowledge management and the behavior of their societies.

A kind of Meta Individuals (Societies) were generated that inhabit a Meta Environment/Ecosystem that will govern their behaviors.

?On the one hand, the heirs of the new great concept generated by human intellectuality, the"Freedom", found a fertile field for its development and expansion in the new lands of the North American continent, in its middle geographical strip, which became, in the same century as the French Revolution, the creation of a new state in the new world (United States of America) whose philosophical cornerstone and guideline, like the aforementioned, was engendered by the intellect and political and epistemic capacity of a few wise men and social and cultural references in their environment: (Thomas Jefferson with the support of Benjamin Franklin y John Adams; under the military leadership of George Washington).

Beyond the statements that, like in France, required many years of maturation and overcoming many discursive and ethical contradictions, they finally fostered the bases for the development of a world that moved with rules that until now were unknown man that's it they canceled.

Concomitantly with freedom as a collective paradigm of life, it developed from another paradigm that in mode symbiotic It was established and spread like wildfire from the Anglo-Saxon world to the rest of Western societies: capitalism.

Attributed to his original intellectual mentor: Adam Smith (Kirkcaldy, June 16, 1723-Edinburgh, July 17, 1790), the theory and the capitalist system found in the new continent, an environment more than conducive to its propagation and development, which was strongly favored with the origins of its settlers, the form of colonization of original territory: plots to middle class citizens, farmers, artisans and merchants, as well as intellectuals persecuted from Europe for political but above all religious reasons - a mode absolutely opposite to the Hispanic, Portuguese or Spanish? and French form of colonization. -.

The nature of the northern settlers is characterized by its diversity, versatility and, above all, forced entrepreneurship to adapt and survive adversity.

The diversity of socio-cultural strata, such as religion, adding to the equity in terms of lack of resources and obligation to self-reliance to grow, led to the creation of the collective concept of associativity, synergism and competition. All this in turn, motivated by the certainty of the possession of specific skills of each member, but also of their limitations and discrete knowledge. Knowing their own ignorance leads to the search for wisdom through observation, association and learning.

These ingredients led to the inexorable formula of a product that would be destined to modify global rules: the individual and organizational freedom associated with capitalism.

In this way, for the first time (perhaps unconsciously and unprogrammed), an ecosystem would be generated that self-regulates, regardless of the skills and knowledge of its members. In this self-regulation there is room for all the options of knowledge, behavior and feelings that alternate and interact, with those most likely to be successful prevailing (as a result of natural selection), a dynamic order emerging from the original chaos, which becomes univocally chaotic and ordered in a kind of global behavioral dimer of society as an environment and of citizens as members of all types free in their actions and therefore exposed to the repercussions that their own freedom implies.

The case of its territorial counterpart: South America and southern North and Central America, the absolute dominance of religion (exclusive Catholic), centralization of power of the emissaries of the Spanish, Portuguese crown or colonizing France itself, as well how the unlimited wealth of the southern lands and the absolute subjugation of the aboriginal civilizations, which offered an inexhaustible source of slaves, later enriched by African slaves, led to a colossal concentration of power, where despotism, ignorance and corruption ruled. .

The premise was to contribute gold and silver to their mother countries and submission to the Catholic faith.

This superabundance and ease of access to wealth, large extensions of land and absolute and concentrated power, had no other destiny than the failure in the civic development of societies from the evolution of the viceroyalties to the states of our days. It is worth mentioning that the exception in terms of the dissemination of culture, civilization and knowledge is the Society of Jesus in its Jesuit missions, although they were also, when the time came, evicted and expelled.

Within this new“Maremagnum” behavioral Collective and individual, we position ourselves to discreetly observe a part of it, regarding the cognition of individuals and the collective; the specific weight of reflective consciousness and holistic type illustration in the perception of location of the “observer - observed”which is the Man.

We establish the observation post as I said, on the basis of freedom and the conception of “wild freedom and responsible freedom.”

Individual Freedom and Collective Freedom

In the processes of creating new behaviors, it is natural that a more or less variable period of maturation and improvement is required, which implies ups and downs in effectiveness and efficiency of the developed mechanism, as well as errors and successes that make adaptive variation and dynamic organization.

In the case of the concept of Freedom, this rule still applies. As a dialectical entity by nature, since for there to be freedom as a conception, there must have previously been oppression or subjugation as antimony.

For this reason, at the beginning, the recently exercised freedom when it is achieved for the first time is usually confused with unlimited action, with the application of desire without barriers or objections and a strictly individualistic view even when treated collectively.

Progressively, this almost instinctive action of (wild animal released from a cage) tends to be moderated by the force of environmental elements that set many other rules, some of them present even in times of oppression and submission.

To be sustainable, freedom requires respect for the freedoms of others, particularly in the areas of intersection of the respective spaces, which gives rise to the right.

Law is the social instrument that allows organizing and moderating freedoms in an area of coexistence of individuals, for which they must negotiate and submit to certain restrictions in favor of others and vice versa.

However, this is not the only factor to take into account in the process of maturation of freedom and its exercise. By acting with free will, each individual generates an impact on the environment and the other cohabitants, which is why each person must be aware of it in order to be able to abide by the consequences (positive and negative) that their actions generate. This is where knowledge comes into play.

Knowledge, in its most global conception, includes physical (scientific, mathematical), philosophical, emotional, artistic and, above all, ethical and moral knowledge.

In this topic, knowledge is also often confused with knowledge/s and knowledge as a product of formal or more or less established education. The concept of illustration is generally left out of the discussion.

The Education in the Enlightenment was the development of educational systems in Europe that continued throughout the period of theIllustration and in the French Revolution .?

The? XVIII Century , advanced thinking in Europe from the 1650s to the 1780s. It developed from a series of sources of "new" ideas, such as challenges to dogma and the authority of the Catholic Church and by the growing interest in the ideas of science, in theScientific methods . In Philosophy, questioned traditional ways of thinking. (https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Educaci%C3%B3n_en_la_Ilustraci%C3%B3n )

In our modest way of seeing, education is the means to transmit knowledge, but fundamentally, to “teach how to learn.” Once this effect is achieved, the student will be able to develop his or her own curiosity and concern to know or rather, to learn about certain phenomena that interest or concern him or her. Another way of looking at the effects of learning to learn is the biunivocal effect between which it transmits a “knowledge” that simultaneously learns from the learner while operating with the learner's reactions as it generates its collection and processing of information, contributing to the knowledge of both.

The knowledge is quasi static, while knowledge is absolutely dynamic.

From the conjunction of both, the state of Enlightenment of the person arises.

In this condition, the person has a wealth of knowledge and knowledge that gives them intellectual tools to be able to discern and choose the paths to take in each action, generating awareness of the repercussions of their own decisions.

When we act under a state of individual and collective Freedom, enlightenment becomes essential to responsibly exercise that freedom, mediated by the capacity for rational, moral and ethical discernment of each action taken, facing its repercussions.

To be free, it is not enough to be free, you must have a minimum of enlightenment to be able to be aware of it and act with responsible freedom. Otherwise, an unenlightened free being will simply be an untethered being wandering loose in an indifferent and disconnected environment.

A wild animal is not a free animal… but it is free…

A wild animal in an unnatural environment without restraints or limitations on movement or action is not free; It is a loose animal and a problem for the environment. The same thing happens with a domestic animal left free on the streets…

It is not the same to talk about freedom in terms and individuals as in terms of communities or societies.

Each individual can exercise their freedom and creativity in a certain range that will vary depending on the nature of the social subgroup, group and multigroup to which they are subordinated.

Modern global society includes and governs us; It has a degree of complexity and organization that at this point is autonomously modeled and modulated as if it were a living being. Collective knowledge, added to the collective unconscious and the emotionality shaped by current social behaviors and trends, become increasingly global and homogeneous, failing to recognize or overwhelming the cultural and behavioral characteristics of the societies that make up the large ecosystem.

Thus, physical, cultural and cognitive borders are lost.

Scientific/technological knowledge is no longer a conceptual/functional dimer, but rather a Hamiltonian attractor.. As such, the social impact of its mass diffusion products, which imply interaction in massive and autonomous networks in its organization through artificial intelligence mechanisms that modulate and coordinate its distribution, action and response pathways, condition the behavior of societies and communities. unifies and homogenizes. For obvious reasons I will not mention the wonderful and formidable positive repercussions that these same technologies exert on the well-being and quality of life of societies and their feedback for the enhancement of the optimal use of scientific knowledge.

I will only stop at the observation of the behavioral effect that the technologies of the IV industrial revolution generate on societies and their eventual evolutionary impact of knowledge on them.

We could say in a very crude way that autonomous technologies (let's call them that to encompass biotechnology, information technology, robotics, machine learning and artificial intelligence), facilitate, make accessible, economize and massify access to goods, services, knowledge, communications, transportation and energy management, among a universe of applications, ranging from precision medicine to bionics, to precision agriculture and engineering.

Ease and accessibility leads to convenience and “abundance,” which leads to results with minimal effort. At first, manual and hard or risky jobs were facilitated. Then the ease of accessibility of observation or manipulation of natural events (Biosciences) advanced, then to inanimate things that could even be combined with biological events (Nanotechnology, bionics, robotics). The phenomenon of the “internet of things” reaches the most basic domestic world, so that, currently and evolving: artificial intelligence becomes the fundamental protagonist in the cast of actors of human tragedy.

Finally, every question that anyone has or concern can eventually be “resolved” by a system of autonomous technologies and the extremely comfortable situation of access to data, leads to the loss of own effort and motivation for search and learning as such on the part of the person (The function makes the organ), which leads again to the conclusion that to use learning technologies and artificial intelligence, it is again and more than ever a condition sine qua non, have a high level of illustration, in order to use this facility as a cognitive springboard and not as a dispenser of information at your fingertips. In conclusion, great responsibility is required to productively and effectively use the facilities that technology offers, while if we just use the facilities and that's it, it only leads to the loss of freedom.

The evolution of society according to a more than interesting author Yubal Noah Harari:

This author, who stimulus or positively the writing of this article, defines in his work Sapiens, from animals to gods, three possible endings of the evolution of the species in a very juicy synthesis of human evolution:

1. Humans "amortals" dependent, byproducts of a kind of Humanotechnics by genetic manipulation in which infectious, parasitic, degenerative, oncological diseases and genetically programmed aging are abolished or controlled...

The author takes at face value the effectiveness and efficiency (if 100% achieved) of biotechnology and apocryphal and linking technologies. In this situation it would be very feasible to generate, at least in theory and at least in a fraction of humanity, a situation of “amortality”. Differentiating it from immortality, since the control of factors of aging, diseases and degeneration could eventually abolish them, but they would not be exempt from physical accidents or attacks against the person.

Assuming that this situation was possible, a sequence of questions immediately arises that are not new if we refer to universal literature, such as Frankenstein, The Picture of Dorian Gray, Faust and many other classics.

The first question is:

If we turn amortals; From when do we stop aging?

It happens that during personal and biological growth and maturation, structures are built and others are destroyed/worn down and replaced, including the neurons themselves. Knowledge and even more so, enlightenment, require intellectual and experiential maturity, which is not achieved in childhood or adolescence or in the early stages of adulthood.

Perhaps if we stop aging in our twenties, do we deprive ourselves of acquiring the maturity of our '40s or '50s or more? And in that case, would the evolution of humanity be “everlastingly immature amortal?”

What does maturity imply? We mature in order to acquire wisdom to face the challenges that will arise in the future, but also, just as in a stage of human evolution, the awareness of ignorance motivates the generation of knowledge, the awareness of man's finitude motivates the efficient management of experience and learning to achieve knowledge: Maturity.

How do we define the optimal time to become mortals? and “no geronts”?

Would this action involve stopping the maturation process and at what cost?

What would the management of humanity itself be like by immature humans who have no awareness of finitude?

Would the feeling of satisfaction from an achievement be abolished? Would it make sense to set goals and eventual achievements?

?I would reach this condition of mortality to all humans equally? If not, how will the asymmetry in such a condition impact global society?

Would humanity achieve happiness?

1. “Cyborg” humans included science fiction fantasies, but based on real technical potentiality.

The conception of hybrid cybernetic individuals would per se raise a species identity discrepancy. The “enhancements'' or amplified capabilities of bionic inserts they would exercise a role of distortion in the most basic physiology and in the typical daily attitudes of the species that include emotionality, feelings, loss of intellectual inductivity and something very subjective but important: the change of concern for an ailment and the attempt to alleviate it, on the cold and objective concept of replacement of parts and supplies. Would this individual be a real human being?

1. Transhumanism, conceived through the eventual final achievement of fully storing and emulating the human mind in devices that can be interconnected with similar ones, establishing a kind of cerebral internet of individuals, achieving, in turn, that the “hardware is software” to make it possible. .

These three possible endings will end humanity as a biological species and eventually the biological natural environment and ecosystems. It would also put an end to standard human behavior, sexuality, the pleasure/displeasure dichotomy and the concept of happiness...

Amortality:

From what stage in life should you decide to be amortal? Well, growth implies constant destruction and reconstruction, which goes in the opposite direction to the maintenance of youth that establishes a biological status quo.

Mortality would affect the maturation function, since maturity is achieved from the evolution of experiences and experiences, from the basis of the individual's awareness of finitude. This in turn leads to achieving knowledge, which goes beyond accumulated knowledge.

How to define maturity and maturation/growth of thought without the existence of mortality?

Cyborg Societies:

What about the wisdom of maturity and experience valued in terms of finitude?

How is the dilemma of: “in biology, hardware is software” resolved?

Would we be forever dependent on factories and industrial plants that produce parts and supplies to keep our bodies and brains in optimal condition but at the same time permanently adapting to new conditions and learning?

There was no longer pain or pleasure, no disappointment or longing/satisfaction, there would be no room for emotion.

Transhumanism:

Even if it were possible to transfer and store minds, combining them in intangible brain networks, the limitless propagation of the human mind would resemble a geological evolution (inorganic) or to viral engineering.

Finally: how can you evolve and grow if there is no reason to survive?

In any case, man will cease to exist as such and it will be the end of the species.

Knowledge is different from intelligence and different from knowing

Knowledge is properly human while intelligence is shared in multiple ways by non-human living beings.

Knowledge includes knowledge and contains it, but transcends it. Knowledge includes the sciences, arts, philosophy and theology; mathematics, ethics, morality, emotions, under a mantle of reflective consciousness and temporality (past=present=future).

Art is the global sublimation of knowledge by managing emotional knowledge and temporal/space. Art is to the hermeneutical as the senses are to the identifying: “it is the same thing”...

Emotionality, nostalgia, love, altruism, are attributes linked in some way to knowledge and the conception of the finitude of the conscious being and the things of the universe.

Projection, reflection, proactivity, conceptualization and emotionality are part of the package that constitutes knowledge.

Perhaps a simple action: Make all human activity more discreet and fractionated, distributed in small communities in the style of intelligent and interconnected burgs or towns; Communicating between them with criteria of synergy and complementarity instead of savage competition, could mean a qualitative change and greater survival of exclusively human attributes, respecting and learning from other forms of life.

Perhaps this could be a solution to the problems that afflict humanity or the alternative to the possible fate of "the moth attracted by the light of the flame of a lit candle"...

A sign of superior Humanism could perhaps be:

Giving ground to nature and abdicating his intention to be a “God who does not know what he wants”…

I think … I am (Rene Descartes)...

?

Eduardo Terranova, March, 2024