The Evolution of Cloud-Native Deployment and Operation, a Journey from 2013 to the Present

The Evolution of Cloud-Native Deployment and Operation, a Journey from 2013 to the Present

The progression of cloud-native deployment over time has ushered in granular control over feature management, resulting in enhanced performance and substantial cost savings. As cloud service providers expand their product offerings, the focus on being cloud-native has evolved from Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) to Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS). The arrival of containerization and orchestration allowed for more precise control over scaling. Subsequent stages concentrated on handling complexity caused by the emergence of hyperscalers via managed databases and reducing idle time through serverless computing. Service meshes tackled inter-service communication challenges arising from the proliferation of microservices. These key innovations have paved the way for a more streamlined, efficient, accessible, and cost-efficient approach to cloud-native software development. The evolution of cloud-native software from IaaS to PaaS was facilitated by containerization and orchestration-enabled scaling, the rise of managed databases and serverless computing, and the emergence of service meshes to address the growing number of microservices.

I. Early Stages of Cloud-native Deployment (2013-2015)

In the initial stages, cloud-native deployment posed significant challenges due to the steep learning curve, complexities of managing resources, lack of matured tools, and the need for consistency across diverse environments. Before adopting a cloud-native approach, businesses had to pay for physical servers and employ internal teams to manage runtimes and security. By hosting application infrastructure on the cloud through IaaS solutions, companies were able to reduce the need and expenses for hardware and operations. However, many of these transitions were "lift and shift" processes, where the architecture remained unchanged between environments. As a result, early cloud software lacked a more modern service-oriented architecture's scalability, flexibility, and efficiency. Containerization revolutionized cloud-native deployment by ensuring consistency between test and runtime environments. In the past, inconsistencies caused by the proliferation of operating systems, libraries, and dependencies made coordination difficult, leading to delayed releases and inefficient testing. Proliferation was solved by encapsulating the code and its dependencies into a single package, called a container. These containers are deployed across different environments, which ensures code is run consistently. They are lightweight and efficient, making them quick and easy to spin up and tear down, reducing hosting costs, and increasing scalability and efficiency. One of the most popular containerization platforms is Docker, which provides developers with an open-source toolset for creating, deploying, and managing containers. Each docker image contains the necessary files, libraries, and configuration settings to run an application in both test and runtime environments. Container orchestration systems, such as Kubernetes, automate container deployment, scaling, and management. Managing containers manually is a time-consuming and error-prone process. Kubernetes automates the spinning up and down of containers across multiple nodes (physical or virtual machines), which reduces the need for manual intervention and lowers costs. The financial benefits of containerization are significant. By encapsulating code and its dependencies into containers, developers can ensure that their code runs consistently across different environments, reducing hosting costs and increasing scalability. Containers are lightweight, efficient, and require fewer resources than traditional virtual machines, which results in reduced hosting costs and improved efficiency. Additionally, by automating the deployment and management of containers, teams can reduce the need for manual intervention and save on operational costs.

II. Growth of Cloud Hyperscaler Services Through PaaS (2015-2017)

The emergence of hyperscalers drove the innovation of PaaS services, such as managed databases and serverless computing, which enabled greater cost savings and efficiency for developers. Before these technologies, companies had to maintain large in-house teams to manage databases and server infrastructure, which was time-consuming and expensive. PaaS improves upon IaaS by providing not only the underlying infrastructure, such as servers, storage, and networking, but also the middleware, development tools, and other services necessary to develop and manage applications. This advancement allowed developers to focus more on writing code and less on managing infrastructure. As hyperscalers emerged and drove growth services past IaaS offerings, customers quickly outsourced database management and took advantage of new serverless computing capabilities. Managed databases, such as Amazon RDS and Google Cloud SQL, simplified development by automating backups, scaling, and patching. This innovation enabled organizations to focus on building data-driven applications without being hindered by the intricacies of database maintenance. Concurrently, managed NoSQL databases, like Amazon DynamoDB and Google Cloud Datastore, gained traction due to their ability to handle large-scale, unstructured data with low latency, high throughput, and automatic scaling capabilities. These developments in managed databases allowed businesses to leverage the power of cloud hyperscaler services for multiple use cases, from mobile applications to IoT deployments. Serverless computing introduced a new paradigm for developing, deploying, and scaling applications without the need to provision or manage servers. AWS Lambda pioneered serverless computing by offering an event-driven, automatically scalable solution to eliminate the complexities of server management. This innovative approach reduced operational costs because organizations were only billed for the compute time consumed by their functions and didn't require spinning up a new server. The success of AWS Lambda spurred other major cloud providers to develop similar offerings: Azure Functions and Google Cloud Functions. This shift ushered in a new era of agility, cost optimization, and efficiency in compute costs, making it an increasingly attractive option for businesses and developers.

III. The Emergence of Service Mesh (2019-2023)

Service meshes address the complexities that arise when managing inter-service communication, security, and observability in microservices-based architectures. With the emergence of microservices, organizations now break down monolithic applications into granular, independent services that can be developed, deployed, and scaled separately. Managing services is a complex and cumbersome process without a service mesh, as developers otherwise manually manage the list of existing services, oversee load balancing between services, and handle service failures. A service mesh, such as Istio, Linkerd, or Consul, addresses these challenges by providing a dedicated infrastructure layer specifically designed to manage and secure inter-service communication within a microservices-based architecture. By handling tasks such as traffic management, load balancing, authentication, and encryption at the network level, service mesh layers significantly simplify the process of enforcing security and compliance policies across multiple microservices. The steep learning curve in setting up a service mesh and the need for careful configuration management often acted as barriers to adoption. However, the benefits of service mesh adoption can outweigh these challenges, especially for organizations with large and complex microservices-based architectures. Some of the key benefits of service mesh adoption include: Better traffic management and load balancing: Service mesh technology provides features such as traffic routing, load balancing, and circuit breaking, making it easier to manage traffic flows between microservices. Enhanced security: Service mesh enables developers to implement security policies such as encryption, authentication, and authorization at the network level, making it easier to enforce security policies across many microservices. Improved observability: Service mesh technology provides distributed tracing and logging to simplify monitoring and debugging microservice-based architectures. Increased scalability: Service mesh enables organizations to scale their microservices-based architectures by providing features that automate service discovery and load balancing.

Summary

The evolution of cloud-native software over the past decade has revolutionized software development and deployment. Innovations such as containerization, cloud hyperscaler services, and service mesh have streamlined processes, enhanced efficiency, and reduced costs. Containerization, through platforms like Docker and Kubernetes, has eliminated inconsistencies between test and runtime environments, ensuring consistent code execution and scalability. Cloud hyperscaler services, including managed databases and serverless computing, have reduced operational overhead, allowing companies to focus on software development and innovation. Service mesh technology has provided a vital infrastructure layer to manage and secure inter-service communication within complex microservices-based architectures. The continuous expansion of CSP offerings has made cloud-native software development more accessible and efficient, enabling organizations to deliver value for their customers and maintain a competitive edge. As cloud-native software evolves, new tools and services emerge to accelerate innovation and foster a thriving technology ecosystem.


Special thanks to the contributions made by Harrison C. and Ioannis Wallingford

Irina Filinovich

Innovation Project Manager @ TechHive | Innovation Management, Project Planning

10 个月

Great article! Thank you Michael!

回复
Tim Flinders

CTO/COO Asset Management at ION

10 个月

Interesting to see this laid out Michael, service mesh may have started a little earlier I was using Consul in 2016 for Service Meshing it just wasn't called that. I agree the popularity increased from 2019.?I recently attending AWS's global conference I was surprised how much serverless was being adopted for scaled applications in ground up native deployments.?That potentially that might demonstrate a shift from central IT teams for deployment and removing the continuous maintenance needs for patching, etc.??

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了