Every Prompt Matters.
ChatCO2: Understanding the Hidden Carbon Footprint of ChatGPT
A few weeks ago, I put together a simple website called ChatCO?. The idea came to me after reading an article about the environmental impact of ChatGPT:
This left me with an unsettling feeling. Maybe it’s the never-ending race to upskill and stay employable, combined with the frustration of knowing this process also emits so much CO?. We have to pollute to keep up—it’s a tough spot to be in.
Soon after, I fell down the rabbit hole—reading Medium articles, browsing subreddits, watching YouTube videos. I’ve been trying to absorb as much information as possible to avoid adding more noise in the form of misinformation or avoidance.
What can I do? Should I do anything?
A website compiling 40 of the most-searched ChatGPT questions is just a minuscule drop in the ocean—one that may evaporate sooner than later. But its purpose goes beyond reducing a few grams of CO? emissions. It was a way to highlight that something as simple as asking something on ChatGPT has consequences. A single query may seem insignificant, but millions per day add up to a significant impact.
Most digital products hide the energy they consume. We don’t think about how much power it takes to play, host, or share a YouTube video because it’s instantly available on our screens. But behind every click are power plants, servers, and massive infrastructure keeping the internet running. Data centers alone contribute nearly 1% of global CO? emissions, with platforms like YouTube requiring vast amounts of energy to stream billions of hours of content daily. Our likes, swipes, and views aren’t just virtual—they leave a footprint.
I want people to be aware of this—to keep it in mind and practice what I call "conscious prompting." If this powerful tool helps me be more efficient, I should also use it more responsibly. Not just for efficiency at work, but because we owe it to our planet. Technology, economic growth, and environmental responsibility are connected. As users, we’re not just voting with our wallets but with how we engage with technology.
I’ll leave you with one fact:
In comparison, each ChatGPT query emits 2.5–5g of CO?. If something can be found on Google, it likely doesn’t need to be asked on ChatGPT.
We have access to infinite amounts of information, but how we access it matters.
Technology should advance, but not at the expense of our environment. It doesn't matter how much AI and LLMs progress if nature is being derailed. Tech alone is not enough—and hopefully, we won’t have to remind ourselves in the future that there are no prompts for survival.
--
Subscribe my newsletter for updates on my work and spoiler-free takes on pop culture