Every Artist was First an Amateur

Now I just noticed your publications Eric. Every art historian was once an amatuer too. I am still an amatuer but slightly developed art researcher. Like you you cant teach people to become an art researcher they have to work hard and learn how to do it themselves. It is all in the development. So in your case Eric Armusik "The Development of a Caravaggio" styled artist. It looks as though your manager is waiting for you to become Shakespeare too to arrange a major exhibition on your life and works yourself. I will read your publications and get back to you Eric. I dont often read peoples modern publications as I am always too busy keeping up reading from this history of the Italian Renaissance. You have caught my eye Eric that for some reason I wish to know more about you and your works. I could then better picture it in my head how long it would take the likes of Tiziano or Leonardo da Vinci to paint the "Mona Lisa". These artists were born to be artists and I feel I wish to compare them with you. Is there any other artists out there that you can compare to paint as good as you Eric in the Caravaggio style? It is very clear we can see you can paint like a Master but can you paint like Titian and use your fingers?

Is there anything like terrible art ? There's no single piece that can be called terrible out of all you have produced since your early years. Lots of so called masters don't have the pedigree of anatomy you portray in your works at your early stage !