For Every Action, There is an Equal and Opposite Reaction
Thomas P. (Tom) Logan
Independent Consultant | Asian Business Development, Geopolitics, Crisis Management, Due Diligence, OSINT, Strategy, AI (日本語æµæš¢) ??IN TOKYO??31 years in Japan (PEARL HARBOR ROTARY CLUB)
"日本ã®ä¿å®ˆå‹¢åŠ›ã€Œæ•µåŸºåœ°æ”»æ’ƒèƒ½åŠ›ã®ç¢ºä¿ã€ã‚’è¦æ±‚"
The fundamental law of Sir Isaac Newton in his Philosophi? Naturalis Principia Mathematica (1687)? Most everyone knows. "When one body exerts a force on a second body, the second body simultaneously exerts a force equal in magnitude and opposite in direction on the first body." Could this be certainly something that North Korea should have been cognizant of, as well as the diplomatic forces of the free world which appeased and coddled the Kim Dynasty in Pyongyang for nearly 25 years steeped in unrealistic approaches?
For not a few knew it would only be a matter of time--through the rising muck of all of the various North Korean uranium and plutonium production bench marking, increasingly powerful underground nuclear tests, provocations with intermediate-ranged missiles, SLBM and mobile terrain launcher tests, quite bellicose statements and actions toward Japan and US bases there (not to mention the rest of Asia)--that eventually voices would rise within Tokyo asserting not only the need for Japan itself to adopt a nuclear defense strategy but to revise its own position to include that of preparing capacities for "preemptive strikes" on Pyongyang. Some of these Japanese voices now are reporting in the forms of former Defense chief Gen Nakatani and Chairman of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party's (LDP) policy council on security Hiroshi Imazu.
These and other top Japanese lawmakers like Isunori Onodera have begun arguing for the capability of Japan to launch a preemptive strikes on North Korea in the face of Pyongyang's increasingly active ballistic and nuclear weapons programs.
Yes. It might well appear. For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
(Observations based on the January 13, 2017 article in the liberal, South Korean Hankyoreh Shimbun entitled: "日本ã®ä¿å®ˆå‹¢åŠ›ã€Œæ•µåŸºåœ°æ”»æ’ƒèƒ½åŠ›ã®ç¢ºä¿ã€ã‚’è¦æ±‚"
https://japan.hani.co.kr/arti/international/26237.html
Business Consultant, Researcher in Geopolitical Risks, Media, Public Health Issues (Columbia),Consumer Law (Sorbonne). Conflict Resolution (Harvard).Independent Evaluator for EU global development projects.
7 年This is an interesting post. I just have a few glosses to add. The perception of North Korea in their foreign policy and their strategic discourse will be of importance in North Korea's future. Yes the fragility of peace in this Far East quadrant is of concern but there is still uncertainty behind the transition of power in North Korea. Still it's neighbours, namely China, Japan, Russia and the US) will need to exercise restraint and resist from any rash interventions to the North Korean regime's expected intimidations or unexpected misadventures. If Japan's PM in 2008, Koizumi Junichiro was able to score a diplomatic breakthrough with the abductees issue with North Korea, there are other avenues in breaking the insecurity of the Hermit Kingdom and its self-imposed isolationism by its political elite. The N. Korean President is manifestly inexperienced and too young to be a four star general. He lacks pedigree military experience and is consolidating power. He is distrustful of foreign scrutiny and ...power is centered by his immediate family. The risk seems to be more of elite instability. Gordon Flake of the Mansfield Foundation is of the opinion that the US diplomacy is dependent on policy and not personalities. However the incoming Trump administration needs to implicate its foreign policy commitments more fully and open dialogue directly rather than exhibit isolationism or expect China to fast track North Korea's dénucléarisation programme to prevent any crisis in view of the power vacuum. North Korea clearly has a lot to gain. According to Professor Okonogi Masao of Keio University power transition will not result in the regime either. Yevgeni Kim from the Institute of the Far East believes that all major appointments in North Korea are under control. So dialogue and negotiations ought to address self-interests and insecurities so that is a win-win situation for all parties. Negotiations and diplomacy open channels and it obeys not only the fundamentals of physics of positive action and reaction but one of fundamental rational thinking. If Russia can work out the Khasan-Raijan railway project connecting the two Koreas, then North Korea can be expected to become a meaningful economic partner. Thank you for reading.
Director
8 å¹´ãƒãƒ¼ã‚¬ãƒ³ã•ã‚“ã€ãŠä¹…ã—ã¶ã‚Šã§ã™ã€‚