EU vs Google: A case study in bullying

EU vs Google: A case study in bullying

The erstwhile Google created a search engine. That search engine acquired utility like features. Utilities like Electricity, Gas...Water. It was sought after by all and became an absolute necessity of 21st century life for the poor, the rich , the young,the old, the artists and the academics It was a great tool. So great that Google became a verb. And Google became ubiquitous.

EU recently fined Google $2.7 bn for anti-competive practices. EU anti-trust lawyers argued, rather tenuosly, that Google ranks its services like: maps flights e-commerce higher than one's more superior offered by companies like Amazon, Jet, other smaller online retailers and this is antithetical to the EU consumer's interests especially given the search engines pervasiveness. Let's say for argument's sake EU is right.

But the tool is proprietary! Google can rank search results however they want. 

Maybe EU's argument is not that Google cannot rank its search results however it pleases but THAT the tech giant advertises falsely. THAT in the paperwork it submits as a public company to exchange commissions around the world, it CLAIMS that its search results gives precedence to higher quality content/products/services when it does not as manifested by the lower ranking of Amazon's retail services vs. it own.

But this debate if and when it plays out in EU civil courts would be so hopelessly subjective and will have no shot at resolution . How does one go about proving pre-eminence between services? Maybe Google is preferred by one segment of consumers and Amazon by another. Maybe both eCommerce sites have features that are universally preferred. Which feature carries more weight when assigning ranks for search results ?  Talk about imponderables

Let us again for the sake of argument assume that Amazon can be "objectively" be anointed the better e-commerce site and google has systematically assigned it a lower ranking than Google Shopping in its search results. Does this warrant a $2.7 bn fine? I don't think so. EU needs to appeal to Google's sense of fairness. Offer it incentives for a commitment to equitable rankings not act punitively. Google created a literal Oracle that thus-far only existed in mythologies . It's just and reasonable that it reaps the fruits of its ingenuity. 

If all of this seems unreasonable, EU should create its own search engine and work till it reaches far corners of the continent and is used in every home on every desktop, laptop and mobile phone instead of telling innovative companies how to run their operation. The footsteps of the EU are not exactly one's that we would like the World's Smartest companies to follow.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Amit Minhas, FRM的更多文章

  • War Rooms

    War Rooms

    Chief John Anderton put his haptic gloves on and mentally prepares himself for his investigation ahead like a Conductor…

  • Industries of the Future

    Industries of the Future

    Werner Jacobi built the Integrated Circuit (IC) in 1949 Steve Wozniak took several and organized them into a neat…

  • Doctor in your Pocket

    Doctor in your Pocket

    Dozens of Healthcare Information Startups today are scrambling to design the Doctor In your Pocket (DIP) application…

  • Bioinformatics Bazaar

    Bioinformatics Bazaar

    I love Apple's app store (AS). You can use it to download applications to monitor the weather, trade stocks, summon…

  • Mind Melding: Its Imminence, Regulatory Hurdles & Engineering Challenges

    Mind Melding: Its Imminence, Regulatory Hurdles & Engineering Challenges

    Neuralink, Synchron, Kernel…….are all companies that want to merge mind with silicon not only to cure disease but to…

  • Machine Learning Services: To Develop Inhouse or To Outsource / Lessons from History

    Machine Learning Services: To Develop Inhouse or To Outsource / Lessons from History

    Until 10,000 BC farmers cultivated plots just large enough for sustenance for their families. Subsequently with the…

    1 条评论
  • Crystal Balls for everyone: How can we make Artifical Intelligence more accessible to the layman?

    Crystal Balls for everyone: How can we make Artifical Intelligence more accessible to the layman?

    The most dangerous, misused and thought-annihilating piece of technology invented in the past 15 years has to be the…

  • The Ethics of Genetic Editing: People vs "The Experts"

    The Ethics of Genetic Editing: People vs "The Experts"

    The Phenomenon History is littered with examples of Public’s antagonism towards Scientific Consensus on environmental…

    2 条评论
  • AI Eats R&D

    AI Eats R&D

    “Software is eating the world” Marc Andreesen (2011) “Software is eating the world but AI is going to eat software”…

  • David Bowie and Pharmaceutical Finance

    David Bowie and Pharmaceutical Finance

    Home ownership was a pipe dream for many until Lewis Ranieri came along, started securitizing mortgages and created the…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了