EU Reaches Peak Sustainability?

EU Reaches Peak Sustainability?

The EU has long been the leading edge of sustainability policy - though some might quibble with their approach. But in recent months, European ESG policy has encountered growing opposition and may have just reached its peak.

This week, one of the EU’s most comprehensive sustainability regulations, The Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), failed to pass after several attempts. The policy would require companies to identify environmental and social issues in their value chains and take steps to improve them.

A last-minute French proposal to change the threshold from companies with over 500 employees to over 5,000 employees would have reduced the burden by more than 80% but still did not sway the vote. Germany, Italy, and 11 other EU member states abstained, and one voted no, effectively killing the policy.

Campaigners called the lack of support “deplorable,” Uku Lillev?li , of the WWF’s European Policy Office said, “EU governments’ last-minute sabotaging and postponement of this new rulebook not only disregards the lives, communities, and ecosystems affected by destructive business practices but also deals a blow to the EU’s credibility as a legislator.”

The current EU presidency (Belgium) has two weeks to rescue the policy, after which it cannot be resuscitated until after the June election and will likely die of natural causes. The Belgian presidency said, “We now have to consider the state of play and will see if it’s possible to address the concerns put forward by member states, in consultation with the European Parliament.”

A watered-down nature restoration law did pass despite farmer protests and a last-minute attempt from right-wingers to sink it. The rule aims to restore at least 20% of Europe’s land and air by 2030. However, this rule still needs to go through a round of voting in the EU Council, where the CSDDD failed.

The failure of the CSDDD and the softening of the nature restoration law point to regulatory fatigue setting in amongst Europeans. The farmer protests, which raged in Brussels this week and tied up traffic in Paris in past weeks, add to concerns that the upcoming June elections in the EU will slow down or turn back the EU’s Green Deal.?


SEC Climate Rule to be Finalized March 6th

REUTERS/Andrew Kelly

Last week, we shared that March would finally mark the end of the two-year wait for the SEC’s climate disclosure rule. Now we have a definite date. March 6th will be the day the SEC’s five commissioners vote on (and likely approve by a 3-2 vote) the final rule. The details of the final version will be made public on Wednesday after the vote, which you will be able to watch live here at 9:45 ET.

Reputable sources have indicated that the final rule will not require Scope 3 reporting, and Scope 1 and 2 emissions disclosure will be subject to a financial materiality threshold. SEC Chair Gary Gensler has made statements indicating that the final rule will be hardened against the inevitable legal challenges. Travis Cushman , a representative of the Farm Bureau (one of the groups that threatened litigation), said they “would have no opposition to a final rule that removes Scope 3.”


Climate Action 100+ Fights Back

Al Drago/Bloomberg

Since last week’s announcement that multiple financial institutions left Climate Action 100+ after GOP lawmakers alleged the group was “collusive,” the group has clapped back. In a statement on Monday, they said the climate crisis poses “an ever-increasing financial risk to long-term shareholder value and the broader economy, and we can’t afford to take a step back now.”

One of the group's founders, Betty Yee , pointed out that the group still has over 700 members who are all committed to their goals. Yee said, “There is clear evidence of demonstrable progress that we all can be proud of.”

In support of Climate Action 100+, US climate envoy John Kerry said asset managers are “turning away from science” and are “on the wrong side of history” for scaling back climate action.?


The Oracle of Omaha’s Climate Contradictions

Matthew Cavanaugh/EPA /

Annual letters from the world’s largest moneymen have generated buzz for years. BlackRock CEO Larry Fink’s annual letters were required reading for the ESG crowd before they peaked in 2021 when Mr. Fink and his company were targeted by the anti-woke campaign. This week, Warren Buffet raised eyebrows with his annual letter, which was both bullish for oil and gas and worried about the threat of climate risks on utilities.?

The climate contradictions ran through his letter, revealing a disconnect between profiting from oil and gas while worrying about climate risks affecting his portfolio. For example, Berkshire Energy's PacifiCorp faces tens of billions of dollars in civil liability for its alleged role in multiple wildfires in California and Oregon. Dan Bakal of Ceres said, “There could be some very considerable disconnects on the level of risk they (Berkshire Hathaway) face.”


Singapore’s Mandatory Climate Reporting Rule

Singapore will begin mandatory ISSB-aligned climate reporting for listed and large non-listed companies starting in 2025.?

The rules will be phased in, beginning with Scope 1 and 2 reporting for listed companies in 2025 and Scope 3 the following year. Large non-listed companies, defined as those with at least $1 billion in revenue and $500 million in assets, will have to start Scope 1 and 2 reporting in 2027 and Scope 3 reporting in 2029.?


A Worrying Sea Change

Climate scientists are deeply concerned about increasing heat in the oceans. In both the Northern and Southern hemispheres, ocean temperatures have been breaking records by large margins for over a year. Scientists are bewildered by how ocean water can be so hot. Marine scientist Rob Larter said, “It’s quite scary, partly because I’m not hearing any scientists that have a convincing explanation of why it is we’ve got such a departure.”

The knock-on effects of ocean heating include reducing sea ice, slowing ocean circulation, and more severe hurricanes - all of which have massive impacts. New research also revealed the implications of warming oceans for marine life, like whales. For example, the 2016 ocean heatwave reduced humpback whale populations by as much as 20%.?

The views expressed on this website/weblog are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer.?


Other Notable News:


Notable Podcasts:?

Kitti Tumbász

Senior Director, ESG & Product Compliance at Danfoss Climate Solutions

9 个月

Thank you for a very relevant and informative newsletter Tim Mohin, a pleasure to follow. The saga of the CSDDD has its irony with so many country level Human Rights Due Diligence Laws in place in Europe, e.g. Germany's Supply Chain Due Diligence Act, Norway’s Transparency Act, etc…. The ball is rolling and responsible businesses have been strengthening their approach across their supply chain for years which also showed in the huge support from corporate players for this Directive. The next 2 weeks will be incredibly exciting to follow, as you stated: the policy is not dead yet….

Randy Charles

Providing Solutions for Sustainability with Greenway Companies

9 个月

Remind me on the EU's CSDDD... is that the regulatory directive that I recall correctly having something like over 1000 different metrics to report? Maybe I'm getting it confused with another one. That's not hard to do!

回复
Vipul M. Mali ??

16+ Years' Recruitment Experience for India & Africa | Executive Resume Writer | Talent Acquisition Expert since 2007 | Unstop Top Mentor | Podcast Host - Expert Talk by Vipul The Wonderful | Top 1% Mentor at Topmate

9 个月

Awesome

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了