EU migrants give more than they take

EU migrants give more than they take

We’ve known this all along, but still many people don’t believe it. Citizens living here from the rest of the EU/EEA give much more to Britain than they take. They are a boon, not a burden, and we’d be poorer without them.

Last July in Parliament, Philip Davies, the Conservative MP for Shipley in West Yorkshire, asked Damian Hinds, the Minister for Employment, what benefits are received by EU migrants living in Britain.

Mr Hinds replied that, “The nationality and immigration status of claimants is not currently recorded on benefit payment systems.” 

However, Mr Hinds was able to point Mr Davies to a government website giving information about the tax and national insurance contributions paid by EU/EEA citizens in Britain for the tax year 2013-2014, and the benefits those citizens received in tax credits and child benefits. 

The government website he referred to was:

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/502129/benefit-expenditure-eea-nationals-ad-hoc-stats.pdf 

We already knew UK-dwelling EU migrants pay six times more tax and national insurance than they claim in 'HMRC benefits'. These are specifically child benefit or tax credits.

But the figures released for 2013-2014 threw up some surprises.

French citizens living in Britain are the European nationals contributing the most to the Treasury coffers. In 2013-2014, they contributed £2.3 billion in tax and national insurance. Yet they only took £90m in tax credits and child benefits. 

That means French citizens here contributed almost 26 times more to the Treasury than they took in HMRC benefits.

Second on the list of biggest contributors were the 790,000 Polish workers in Britain, who handed over nearly £2.2 billion to our Treasury in 2013/14 (the latest figures available).

They took £911 million in HMRC benefits, meaning that they gave 2.4 times more than they received.

The most impressive gulf between what’s paid in tax and claimed back from HM Revenue and Customs was by Greek citizens working in Britain. They paid 31 times more in tax (£439 million) than they claimed in HMRC benefits (just £14 million).

Not one EU/EEA country on the list showed any one of them taking more than they gave. Even the country with the smallest gap, Slovakia, had their citizens here paying almost twice as much in taxes as they took out of HMRC in benefits (£208 million to £122 million).

Overall, citizens here from all EU/EEA paid taxes in one year totalling £14.7 billion, but only took HMRC benefits worth £2.6 billion. 

Summarised HM Revenue and Customs in their report:

"In 2013-14, EEA nationals paid £12.1 billion more Income Tax and National Insurance than they took out in tax credits and Child Benefit." 

That means that in one year alone, citizens here from the rest of Europe gave almost six times more to the Treasury than they took in HM Customs and Excise benefits.

(Switzerland is included in the figures because, although it’s not a member of the EU/EEA, it is part of the Single Market, meaning Swiss nationals have the same rights to live and work in the UK as EEA nationals).

The HMRC benefit figures didn’t include DWP benefits, such as Jobseeker's Allowance or disability payments. But even if they were included, there is still a significant net gain from the receipts of EU/EEA tax contributions versus the benefits they receive.

Figures from the Department of Works and Pensions revealed that the out-of-work benefits paid to EU/EEA citizens totalled £886 million in the 2013-2014 tax year - just 3% of the total DWP budget for such benefits. These benefits include housing benefits, Jobseekers Allowance, and other out-of-work benefits. 

Total DWP benefits paid to EU/EEA migrants during the 2013-2014 tax year, including in work and out of work, came to £3.4 billion, meaning there was a net overall gain of £8.7 billion from EU/EEA migrants here in just one year. (Source at end of article). 

The DWP also reported that as of February 2015, only 21,460 nationals from the rest of the EU were claiming Jobseekers Allowance, and only 3,900 were claiming disability allowance. (See itv.com/news/2016-02-03/what-benefits-can-eu-migrants-claim/).

In addition to income tax and national insurance, EU migrants living in Britain also pay a wide range of 'indirect taxes', such as VAT, duty on petrol, beer and cigarettes, as well corporation tax and business rates.

Of course, this isn't the full picture, and the overall calculations are far more complicated than simply deducting benefits paid out from taxes received.

But in summary we can see: all those EU citizens working here are paying in taxes far more than they receive in in-work benefits. 

Their tax contribution also more than adequately covers the costs of the very small number of EU migrants claiming out-of-work benefits. And even after all that, there is a massive surplus from the tax contributions of EU migrants to help the country. 

As part of his EU reforms before the referendum, the then Prime Minister, David Cameron, introduced an ‘emergency brake’ on the benefits EU migrants can receive, meaning that new EU/EEA migrants would have to wait four years to receive in-work benefits. 

Many migration and employment specialists were surprised by the imposition because the 'brake' wouldn’t make any difference. As even the Brexit-supporting Daily Telegraph pointed out:

“Around 90% of the EU nationals that come to Britain would not even be affected by the brake as they do not claim tax credits.”

This really should come as no surprise. We have known for years that EU migrants coming to Britain make a massive net contribution to Britain. 

They come to Britain to work, and fill job vacancies that there are simply not enough Britons to do. 

Most of these migrants are in full and gainful employment. They are often dedicated, hard-working and highly desired by British employers. Only a tiny proportion are claiming benefits, and none came for benefits.

In extensive research undertaken by University College London, it was discovered that EU migrants arriving in Britain in the last decade (between 2001 to 2011) made a massive NET contribution to our Treasury of £20 billion. 

During the same period, British people took out MORE from the Treasury than they put in – a deficit of a whopping £617 billion. 

The same report revealed that, since most of those EU migrants came to Britain with their education already paid for, they ‘endowed the country with productive human capital that would have cost the UK £6.8bn in spending on education.'

A separate study conducted by the LSE last year concluded that:

? EU immigrants pay more in taxes than they use public services and therefore they help to reduce the budget deficit.

? The areas of the UK with large increases in EU immigration did not suffer greater falls in the jobs and pay of UK-born workers. 

? EU immigrants are more educated, younger, more likely to be in work and less likely to claim benefits than the UK-born.

The fact is that EU migrants coming here are enriching our country (as do non-EU migrants). 

They are helping to pay for our schools and hospitals. They are contributing to our pensions. They are mostly in-work, paying-in more than they take-out, and spending most of their hard-earned earnings right here in this country.

So, why would Britain want to put a put a ‘brake’ on the numbers of citizens from the rest of the EU coming here, resulting in a drastic reduction in the huge benefits they bring to our country?

I asked the same question during the referendum campaign on the James O’Brien LBC radio phone-in programme. 

Mr James O’B responded:

“You leave me only with xenophobia and mild racism as the only motivation for the ‘Leave’ campaign…”

Is that right? Some Britons would prefer to forego the benefits that migrants bring to Britain because… they don’t like foreigners?

If so, that’s a high price the country will have to pay for Brexit, driven by xenophobia. 

? Report and graphic by Jon Danzig

? Related: Link to Jon Danzig’s phone-in to LBC’s James O’Brien during the referendum campaign: www.facebook.com/Reasons2Remain/videos/260542417638468/

? SOURCES: www.gov.uk/government/statistics/further-statistics-on-tax-contribution-of-eea-nationals-for-2013-to-2014

? Link to 'DWP benefit expenditure on claims from EEA nationals, 2013/14' www.gov.uk/government/statistics/dwp-benefit-expenditure-on-claims-from-eea-nationals-201314

? Link to UCL report: www.ucl.ac.uk/news/news-articles/1114/051114-economic-impact-EU-immigration

? Link to LSE report: www.cep.lse.ac.uk/BREXIT/press1.asp?index=5053

? Please re-Tweet:


Liam Halliday

Senior leader with expertise in billing operations, revenue assurance and financial transformations. Proven ability to scale, optimize cost and grow revenues, delivering multimillion-pound efficiencies.

7 年

I still think May made a mistake by not making a clear distinction between the EU as an institution and the citizens of Europe that allowed a narrative to develop that Britain was xenophobic. EU migration is an objectively positive contribution to the UK economy. Migrants do jobs people can't do, or won't do, or study, and make the same rational choice as anybody would. Jon and I may disagree on a lot of things around this area, but when it comes to the benefits of immigration, I'm totally there. I hope in the future the UK will develop a points based system founded on market requirements as a sensible mid-point, rather than a totally arbitrary target.

回复
Richard Bannister

Bank RMN at Essex Partnership University NHS Trust

7 年

Brilliant inarguable article Jon.

回复
Tim Price

CEO at Solutions Unlimited LLP

7 年

These figures are not new and have not been challenged by May's mad mob of Brexiteers even though they have had plenty of time to do so. I think part of the problem here is that the giving is less noticeable that the taking, especially with a rabidly Brexit biased foreign owned Press pushing the agenda. I understand that now child benefits are only paid for children in the country, so the Brexit brigade cannot talk so much about currency outflow either. That makes this all the more important to share - and I am sharing it now.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Jon Danzig的更多文章

  • Fixing broken Britain starts with changing a broken lightbulb

    Fixing broken Britain starts with changing a broken lightbulb

    UK democracy needs radical reform, but there’s little evidence our leaders are ready to take up the challenge, writes…

    2 条评论
  • It was never just about trade

    It was never just about trade

    Eurosceptics often claim that they love Europe but hate the European Union. They assert that Britain can still be part…

    5 条评论
  • My extremely bizarre overnight sleep test

    My extremely bizarre overnight sleep test

    Today is World Sleep Day. Their message this year is to promote that sleep is essential for health.

    1 条评论
  • A vote for Brexit was a vote for Putin

    A vote for Brexit was a vote for Putin

    After the EU referendum, suspicions grew about the role of Russia in clinching the narrow ‘win’ for Brexit. Evidence…

    11 条评论
  • The value of being citizens of Europe

    The value of being citizens of Europe

    Back in 2013 I wrote an article called, THE VALUE OF BEING CITIZENS OF EUROPE. We didn’t know then that within three…

    5 条评论
  • Never again? It's happening again.

    Never again? It's happening again.

    After the Second World War, during which many millions were systematically, industrially, gruesomely murdered in the…

    4 条评论
  • How did we get stuck with Brexit?

    How did we get stuck with Brexit?

    All the Tory candidates to be our next Prime Minister just accept Brexit as a fact of life, without question, even…

    5 条评论
  • How do we get out of this mess?

    How do we get out of this mess?

    In my life, I have never known a worse time either for my country or the world at large. I started to campaign against…

    2 条评论
  • Brexit laid bare

    Brexit laid bare

    Brexit is based on blatant mistruths and lies. Every reason given to leave was a stinking falsification.

    1 条评论
  • In Britain, general elections are how 'the people' decide

    In Britain, general elections are how 'the people' decide

    Some people say it was undemocratic for Britain to join the European Community in 1973 because ‘the people’ weren’t…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了