EU Accuses X of Content Breach: Musk Alleges Foul Play, NIST AI Risk Management Framework and Top 10 Highest-Paid World Leaders in 2024

The latest developments in global governance and economics are stirring up significant discourse. The European Union has leveled serious accusations against X (former Twitter), alleging breaches of digital content regulations, with Elon Musk countering these claims by suggesting a "dirty deal" behind the scenes.

In the realm of artificial intelligence, a new flexible maturity model for AI governance, based on the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) AI Risk Management Framework, promises to offer a more structured approach to managing AI risks.

Meanwhile, a list of the top 10 highest-paid world leaders in 2024 reveals the significant earnings of those at the helm of global politics.

These stories collectively highlight the intricate interplay of technology, regulation, and leadership in today's interconnected world.

EU Accuses X of Breaching Digital Content Rules: Musk Alleges Dirty Deal

Social media platform X (x.com), formerly known as Twitter, is under fire from the European Commission for allegedly breaching the Digital Services Act (DSA). Elon Musk the CEO of X , has vigorously refuted these findings, suggesting ulterior motives behind the accusations.

EU’s Allegations Against X

On Friday, the European Union announced that X's handling of blue checkmarks and its overall transparency and accountability practices violate the DSA. The Commission’s preliminary findings point out that X’s current verification system, which allows any user to obtain a blue checkmark for a monthly fee of about seven euros, constitutes "dark patterns" that can mislead users and are inconsistent with industry best practices.

Before Musk’s acquisition in 2022, blue checkmarks were primarily reserved for celebrities, politicians, and other influential figures to indicate verified status. The Commission argues that the new policy undermines users' ability to discern the authenticity of accounts and the information they share.

Additional Charges

The European Commission’s investigation into X also highlights other significant concerns:

1. Blocking Data Access to Researchers: The DSA mandates that platforms must allow researchers access to public data to scrutinize platform operations and monitor online risks. However, X has been accused of implementing processes that dissuade researchers or require them to pay prohibitive fees for data access.
2. Ad Database Non-Compliance: X has been charged with failing to comply with the DSA’s ad transparency rules. The Commission states that X’s ad database is neither "searchable" nor "reliable," impeding researchers from identifying risks associated with online advertisements.

Musk's Response

Elon Musk has responded combatively to the EU's allegations. He accused the European Commission of offering X a "secret deal" to quietly censor speech in exchange for avoiding fines. Musk announced his intention to take the matter to court, asserting that the truth will be revealed to the people of Europe through a public legal battle.

EU’s Rebuttal

In response to Musk’s allegations, European Commissioner Thierry Breton firmly denied any secret deal, stating that Musk’s team had requested clarification on settlement procedures and EU concerns. Breton reiterated that the DSA provides platforms with the opportunity to offer commitments to resolve cases, and any suggestion of a clandestine agreement was unfounded.

The Broader Impact

X now faces the task of responding to these accusations and potentially making legally binding changes to comply with the DSA. Failure to satisfy the Commission’s requirements could result in penalties of up to 6% of the company’s annual global revenue.

The investigation into X is ongoing, with regulators also examining whether X is doing enough to curb the spread of illegal content, including hate speech and terrorism incitement, and assessing the effectiveness of its Community Notes fact-checking feature.

Industry-Wide Implications

X is not alone in facing scrutiny under the DSA. Other major platforms, including TikTok, Aliexpress Market Place, and Meta Platforms (owner of Meta Facebook and Instagram), are also under investigation for compliance with the new digital law. The outcomes of these investigations could significantly reshape the regulatory landscape for social media and digital content providers across Europe.

Conclusion

The clash between X and the European Commission underscores the growing tension between global tech giants and regulatory bodies seeking to enforce stricter controls over digital content. As this legal battle unfolds, it will likely set important precedents for how digital platforms operate within the EU and their obligations towards transparency and accountability.

https://www.euronews.com/next/2024/07/12/x-in-breach-of-dsa-eu-commission-preliminary-finds

A Flexible Maturity Model for AI Governance Based on the NIST AI Risk Management Framework

In a significant advancement for AI governance, the IEEE-USA AI Policy Committee has released a new publication: A Flexible Maturity Model for AI Governance Based on the NIST AI Risk Management Framework. This report, published in July 2024, aims to enhance the effectiveness of AI governance practices through a dynamic and adaptable model that leverages the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF).

Overview of the Publication

The 30-page document introduces a maturity model that is designed to help organizations assess and improve their AI governance practices. The model is structured around the NIST AI RMF, which provides a comprehensive approach to managing AI risks and ensuring ethical and effective AI systems. This maturity model is intended to be both flexible and scalable, making it suitable for a wide range of organizations and AI applications.

Key Features of the Maturity Model

1. Granularity Levels for Assessments The maturity model features multiple granularity levels for its assessment questions. This allows organizations to tailor the evaluation process according to their specific needs and contexts. Whether an organization is just beginning to implement AI systems or is already managing complex AI portfolios, the model provides a level of detail appropriate for their stage of development.

2. Life Cycle Stage Adaptability One of the standout features of the maturity model is its ability to adapt based on the life cycle stage of the AI systems being evaluated. The model includes modifications and specific questions relevant to different stages such as:

• Planning: Addressing the initial considerations and strategic planning for AI deployment.
• Data Collection/Model Building: Focusing on the data management, model development, and validation processes.
• Deployment: Evaluating the deployment practices, monitoring, and ongoing management of AI systems.

This adaptability ensures that the model remains relevant and practical throughout the various phases of AI system development and use.

3. Multi-System Evaluations For organizations managing multiple AI systems, the maturity model offers modifications to account for the diverse nature of their AI portfolios. This aspect of the model ensures that it can be applied effectively in scenarios where an organization needs to evaluate several different AI systems, each with its own unique characteristics and governance requirements.

Implementation and Scoring Guidelines

The publication includes a detailed questionnaire and scoring guidelines designed to help organizations assess their AI governance maturity. The scoring system provides a structured way to evaluate the effectiveness of current practices and identify areas for improvement. The guidelines are meant to be used by organizations to benchmark their AI governance against established standards and to develop action plans for enhancing their practices.

Contact and Access Information

The publication is available for download in PDF format. For further information, including inquiries about the model or its application, organizations can contact:

• Erica Wissolik, IEEE-USA Government Activities Email: [email protected] Phone: +1 202 530 8347

Conclusion

The release of A Flexible Maturity Model for AI Governance Based on the NIST AI Risk Management Framework represents a significant step forward in the development of robust AI governance practices. By providing a flexible, adaptable model that addresses various stages of the AI lifecycle and accommodates multiple system evaluations, this publication offers valuable tools for organizations seeking to enhance their AI governance frameworks and manage AI-related risks more effectively.

For those involved in AI governance, this publication provides essential guidance and practical resources to support the development of more effective and responsible AI systems.

https://ieeeusa.org/product/a-flexible-maturity-model-for-ai-governance/

A Flexible Maturity Model for AI Governance based on the NIST AI Risk Management Framework

Top 10 Highest-Paid World Leaders in 2024

In the realm of global leadership, the salaries of presidents, prime ministers, and other top officials can vary significantly, reflecting the economic and political context of their respective countries. While these figures often pale in comparison to the compensation of top CEOs, some world leaders command impressive salaries. Here’s a look at the top 10 highest-paid world leaders in 2024, highlighting their annual earnings and titles:

1. Lawrence Wong (Singapore) - $1.61 Million Title: Prime Minister Details: As the highest-paid leader globally, Singapore's Prime Minister Lawrence Wong earns over $1.6 million annually. His compensation package includes a 13th-month bonus and additional benefits.
2. John Lee Ka-chiu (Hong Kong) - $695,000 Title: Chief Executive Details: The Chief Executive of Hong Kong, John Lee Ka-chiu, secures the second spot with an annual salary of $695,000. This role was established in 1997 following the handover of Hong Kong from the UK to China.
3. Viola Amherd (Switzerland) - $530,000 Title: President Details: Switzerland's President Viola Amherd ranks third with a salary of $530,000. Switzerland’s unique political system rotates the presidency annually among the seven members of the Federal Council.
4. Joe Biden (United States) - $400,000 Title: President Details: The President of the United States, Joe Biden, earns $400,000 annually. While this salary is substantial, it is notably lower than the top earners in the global leadership landscape.
5. Anthony Albanese (Australia) - $390,000 Title: Prime Minister Details: Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese takes the fifth position with an annual salary of $390,000.
6. Olaf Scholz (Germany) - $367,000 Title: Chancellor Details: German Chancellor Olaf Scholz earns $367,000 per year, placing him sixth on the list.
7. Ursula von der Leyen (European Union) - $364,000 Title: President of the European Commission Details: Ursula von der Leyen, the President of the European Commission, earns $364,000. Although she does not lead a single country, her role in overseeing the executive branch of the European Union is highly influential.
8. Karl Nehammer (Austria) - $307,000 Title: Chancellor Details: Austria’s Chancellor Karl Nehammer is compensated with $307,000 annually.
9. Justin Trudeau (Canada) - $292,000 Title: Prime Minister Details: The Prime Minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau, receives $292,000 per year.
10. Christopher Luxon (New Zealand) - $288,000 Title: Prime Minister Details: New Zealand’s Prime Minister Christopher Luxon rounds out the top 10 with an annual salary of $288,000.
11. Fumio Kishida (Japan) - $256,000 Title: Prime Minister Details: The Prime Minister of Japan, Fumio Kishida, completes the list with an annual salary of $256,000.

These salaries reflect a range of compensation practices and economic conditions across different nations. While the figures can fluctuate due to changes in policies and additional benefits, they provide a snapshot of how the highest-paid world leaders are compensated for their roles in 2024.

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/top-10-highest-paid-world-leaders-in-2024/

Conclusion

Recent developments in global governance and economics highlight the dynamic interplay between technology, regulation, and leadership. The European Union's accusations against X (formerly Twitter) for violating digital content regulations, and Elon Musk’s counterclaims of a “dirty deal,” underscore the intensifying scrutiny tech giants face from regulatory bodies. This confrontation may reshape how digital platforms operate and adhere to transparency and accountability standards.

In the realm of artificial intelligence, the release of the IEEE-USA’s flexible maturity model based on the NIST AI Risk Management Framework signifies a major advancement in AI governance. This adaptable model aims to improve how organizations manage AI risks, offering tailored assessments for various stages of AI development and diverse system portfolios.

Lastly, the latest ranking of the highest-paid world leaders reveals significant variations in compensation, with Singapore’s Prime Minister Lawrence Wong leading at $1.61 million annually, and Japan’s Prime Minister Fumio Kishida at the lower end with $256,000. These figures reflect the economic contexts and compensation practices of different nations, providing insight into global leadership compensation trends.

Together, these stories illustrate the evolving landscape of global governance, technology regulation, and political leadership, highlighting the interconnected challenges and changes shaping our world.

Sources: Euronews.com ieeeusa.org visualcapitalist.com

X European Commission European Union Twitter TikTok Meta Meta Facebook Instagram Aliexpress Market Place IEEE-USA National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)

#EURegulations #DigitalContent #XPlatform #ElonMusk #SocialMediaScrutiny #DigitalServicesAct #Transparency #DataCompliance #TechRegulation #PlatformAccountability #AIGovernance #NISTAI #AIModel #RiskManagement #TechInnovation #IEEEUSA #AIFramework #GovernanceModel #AICompliance #EthicalAI #WorldLeaders #HighestPaid #GlobalLeadership #PoliticalSalaries #LeadershipCompensation #PrimeMinisters #Chancellors #EconomicInsights #PoliticalEconomy #ExecutiveSalaries

?--------------------------------------------------------------------

Found value in my BOARDS Newsletters series? I invite you to:

?? "Connect" and “Follow” me on LinkedIn

?? Hit the “Like” icon on my editions

?? "Subscribe" to my Newsletter Policymakers Board, a category of BOARDS Interconnected Insights

?? For our collective learning, add your valuable “Comments” below

?? and "Repost" to your network

?? Hit the “Bell” icon on my Profile to get notified of my Newsletters