ETL vs. ELT: Pick the Right approach based on your team, not just trends
ETL vs ELT

ETL vs. ELT: Pick the Right approach based on your team, not just trends

The ETL vs. ELT debate has been around for years. Some say ETL is outdated, others claim ELT is the future. But here’s what really matters: how well your team can execute.

Forcing a paradigm shift just because it’s trendy can frustrate your team, slow productivity, and even lead to attrition. Instead of chasing buzzwords, choose the approach that aligns with your team’s strengths.

ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) – Best for Python-Heavy Teams

In ETL, data is extracted from the source, transformed before it reaches the data warehouse, and then loaded into Redshift (or another warehouse). This approach is perfect for teams comfortable with Python and distributed processing frameworks like Spark.


ETL Workflow on AWS

On AWS, ETL pipelines typically extract data into Amazon S3, transform it using AWS Glue (Spark) or AWS EMR (big data processing), and then load the cleaned data into Amazon Redshift for analytics. By processing transformations outside of the data warehouse, ETL allows for complex processing, pre-aggregations, and efficient structured data ingestion.

Advantages of ETL

  • Leverages Spark & Big Data Processing – AWS Glue and EMR allow for distributed transformations at scale.
  • Optimized Warehouse Storage – Only cleaned, structured data enters Amazon Redshift, making it faster and more cost-efficient.
  • Better for Structured Data Pipelines – If you need to ensure high-quality, transformed data before analysis, ETL is a strong choice.

ELT (Extract, Load, Transform) – Best for SQL-Heavy Teams

In ELT, raw data is loaded directly into Amazon Redshift first, and transformations happen inside the warehouse using SQL. This approach is ideal for teams that work extensively with SQL and prefer a warehouse-centric data strategy.


ELT Workflow on AWS

On AWS, ELT workflows extract data into Amazon S3, load it directly into Amazon Redshift using AWS Glue or Redshift COPY commands, and then transform it using SQL within Redshift itself. By leveraging Amazon Redshift’s massive parallel processing (MPP) capabilities, ELT allows for scalable transformations, real-time data modeling, and flexible schema evolution.

Advantages of ELT

  • Leverages Amazon Redshift’s Power – Redshift is optimized for analytical workloads, making SQL-based transformations highly performant.
  • Faster Data Availability – Since raw data is loaded directly, business teams can start querying sooner.
  • More Flexible Schema Management – Schema adjustments can happen after data is ingested, making ELT more adaptable.

The Real Answer? Follow Your Team’s Strengths

If your team is strong in Python and big data processing, ETL provides greater flexibility with Glue and EMR. If your team prefers SQL-first workflows, ELT lets you fully leverage Amazon Redshift’s modern analytics capabilities.

A data strategy should empower teams, not create roadblocks. The best approach is the one your team can execute at scale.

Are you able to identify your team's strength?

#Cloud #Data #Strategy #ETL #ELT

Ivan Peev

All Pros agree - ETL is the Best

2 周

Georges Awono A couple of points: * Most good ETL platforms do not require programming skills to define transformations. In actuality, the ELT concept is where programming skills are required because SQL is not enough to define the transformations and you have to use Python (DBT). * You can implement flexible ETL solutions by using the metadata-drive data pipelines processing. * ELT will always require database to do the transformations. For that reason, ETL is the better technology to handle real-time or near real-time requirements.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Georges Awono的更多文章

其他会员也浏览了