The Ethical Dilemma of Artistic Collaboration with Saudi Arabia
(image Valentina Di Liscia/Hyperallergic)

The Ethical Dilemma of Artistic Collaboration with Saudi Arabia

In recent years, a concerning trend has emerged of prominent artists engaging with Saudi Arabia's cultural initiatives, despite the nation's ongoing human rights issues. Notably, composer Hans Zimmer has recently been approached to reimagine the Saudi national anthem, a move that has sparked significant debate.

Similarly, artists have performed at events like the Diriyah E-Prix and Aether, which have been criticised as attempts to "art-wash" the kingdom's image.

"Art’s purpose is to show that the powerful are not only powerful but also sensitive, cultured, and good." - Hito Steyerl, "Is the Museum a Battlefield?"

In contrast, some industry professionals have taken a stand against such collaborations. For instance, as the former Global Director of Experience with The Mill, I personally declined to sanction a lucrative opportunity to create a digital twin for the highly speculative 'Neom' project in 2022, citing ethical concerns of both myself and my team. This decision was directly influenced by reports of the displacement of local tribes, the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, and ongoing civil rights abuses within the kingdom.

While proponents argue that engaging with Saudi Arabia can foster cultural exchange and promote openness, these partnerships risk lending legitimacy to a regime that continues to suppress dissent and violate human rights. Artists and creators must carefully weigh the ethical implications of their involvement, considering whether their participation inadvertently supports a narrative that masks ongoing repression.

A Path Toward a More Ethical Future

The future could be different if the global artistic community embraced a new approach to cultural collaboration, one grounded in transparency, accountability, and empowerment of local voices. Rather than supporting initiatives that serve as PR exercises, artists and organisations could prioritise partnerships that demand tangible commitments to human rights and social reform as a prerequisite for engagement.

Global institutions such as biennales, art fairs, and production houses could implement ethical guidelines that discourage collaboration with entities linked to ongoing abuses. By amplifying the voices of dissidents, displaced communities, and marginalised groups through their work, artists could shift the narrative away from superficial branding and towards genuine progress.

Education and dialogue also play a pivotal role in this transformation. By fostering cross-cultural understanding, artists can highlight shared values while maintaining a critical lens. This approach could cultivate cultural diplomacy that inspires meaningful change, leveraging creativity to not only imagine better futures but to actively build them. If artists and cultural institutions take this stand collectively, they can help ensure that art serves as a force for empowerment and progress, rather than a tool for obfuscation.

Further Reading

Six years on: Still no justice for Jamal Khashoggi

https://ipi.media/six-years-on-still-no-justice-for-jamal-khashoggi/

The Dark Side of Neom

https://alqst.org/uploads/the-dark-side-of-neom-expropriation-expulsion-and-prosecution-en.pdf

'UK ‘turning a blind eye’ to threats to kill Saudi activists living in exile

https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/article/2024/jul/18/saudi-arabia-uk-exiles-threats-transnational-repression-human-rights

Saudi Arabia - Not Free

https://freedomhouse.org/country/saudi-arabia

Bibliography on Artwashing

  1. Hito Steyerl. Duty Free Art: Art in the Age of Planetary Civil War. Verso, 2017.
  2. Nicholas Mirzoeff. The Right to Look: A Counterhistory of Visuality. Duke University Press, 2011.
  3. Maureen Ryan. Artwashing: Big Oil and the Arts. Platform, 2019.
  4. Lucy Lippard. Undermining: A Wild Ride Through Land Use, Politics, and Art in the Changing West. The New Press, 2014.
  5. Chin-Tao Wu. Privatising Culture: Corporate Art Intervention Since the 1980s. Verso, 2002.
  6. Olav Velthuis. Talking Prices: Symbolic Meanings of Prices on the Market for Contemporary Art. Princeton University Press, 2005.
  7. Andrea Fraser. 2016 in Museums, Money, and Politics. MIT Press, 2018.
  8. T.J. Demos. Against the Anthropocene: Visual Culture and Environment Today. Sternberg Press, 2017.
  9. Benita Parry. Postcolonial Studies: A Materialist Critique. Routledge, 2004.
  10. Sarah Kendzior. Hiding in Plain Sight: The Invention of Donald Trump and the Erosion of America. Flatiron Books, 2020.

This collection of works explores the intersection of art, politics, and society, revealing the complexities and contradictions of cultural production in the modern world.

Hito Steyerl’s Duty Free Art interrogates art’s complicity in global conflict and surveillance, while Nicholas Mirzoeff’s The Right to Look provides a counterhistory of visuality, challenging dominant power structures through the lens of resistance. Maureen Ryan’s Artwashing critiques the co-opting of art by big oil to sanitize corporate reputations, and Lucy Lippard’s Undermining connects art to land use, politics, and environmental exploitation in the American West. Chin-Tao Wu’s Privatising Culture examines how corporate interventions have reshaped the art world since the 1980s, a theme echoed in Andrea Fraser’s 2016 in Museums, Money, and Politics, which unpacks the ties between cultural institutions and political influence. Olav Velthuis’ Talking Prices explores the symbolic economy of the contemporary art market, while T.J. Demos’ Against the Anthropocene critiques the visual culture complicit in environmental degradation. Benita Parry’s Postcolonial Studies provides a materialist critique of colonialism’s legacy, and Sarah Kendzior’s Hiding in Plain Sight connects these themes to contemporary political realities, exposing how power, propaganda, and cultural manipulation erode democracy.

Together, these works illuminate the entanglement of art, power, and society in an era of global transformation.

Lawrence Peryer

Pioneering Innovator in Music & Entertainment Experiences for Artists & Fans | Producer, Executive, Writer, Commentator, Speaker, and Podcaster.

4 周

what a wonderful and necessary piece, Andrew. I would love to have you write for us on The Tonearm.

Andrew E Melchior

??.?l?l?ll|???●???|???=???|???●???|ll?l?l?.??

4 周

Louvre Abu Dhabi is a striking example of how cultural institutions can serve geopolitical agendas. While it represents a major investment in global heritage, its construction was marred by exploitative labour conditions, with reports of low wages, debt bondage, and extreme heat exposure among migrant workers. The UAE uses the museum as a soft power tool to project an image of openness, even as it faces criticism for human rights abuses, media censorship, and suppression of dissent. France, in exchange for €1 billion, lent the Louvre brand while simultaneously maintaining lucrative arms deals with the UAE, raising ethical concerns about the intersection of culture and realpolitik. Despite its ambitions as a “universal museum,” its curatorial approach has been critiqued for reinforcing a Western-dominated cultural hierarchy, making it a powerful—yet controversial—symbol of 21st-century museum diplomacy.

Eric Hanson

CEO at Blueplanet VR, Inc.

1 个月

Excellent Andrew, couldn’t agree more.

Jennifer Roebuck

CMO / Board Advisor / Venture Leader / Transformation & Commercial Growth / ???? / AI / Web3 / D2C

1 个月

Interesting… it’s certainly a “thing” but art washing is common in most regions. I’ll read ??

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Andrew E Melchior的更多文章

  • The Silent Titans

    The Silent Titans

    How Vanguard, BlackRock, and State Street Shape Our World Without Most of Us Noticing In a world where elections and…

    2 条评论
  • The real safeguard of democracy is education.

    The real safeguard of democracy is education.

    ?????? ???????? ?????????? ???????? ?????? ???????????????????? ???????? ???? ???????? ???? ?????? ????????????????…

    5 条评论
  • You Can Only Save What You Can Carry

    You Can Only Save What You Can Carry

    If you were stranded on a desert island, what music, books, or ideas would you take with you? This simple but powerful…

    8 条评论
  • "Glassholes Are So Back"

    "Glassholes Are So Back"

    I don’t know who needs to hear this, but the military-grade HUD tech that keeps getting dressed up as a civilian…

    4 条评论
  • The Hidden Cost of Face-Wearable Tech

    The Hidden Cost of Face-Wearable Tech

    Why Artists Should Reconsider their role in creating ‘Fascinator’ Apps for Tech Companies A decade ago, while working…

    5 条评论
  • A New Renaissance: How Europe Can Become a Haven for Creators and Thinkers

    A New Renaissance: How Europe Can Become a Haven for Creators and Thinkers

    As the shadow of New American Barbarism stretches across the Atlantic complete with 'X' edicts from Emperor Musk and…

    17 条评论
  • The Criminal Offence of Starting a Riot

    The Criminal Offence of Starting a Riot

    Starting a riot typically falls under public order offences, though the specific legal definitions and penalties vary…

  • The Sound of My Tinnitus

    The Sound of My Tinnitus

    A Symphony of Sound and Silence: Embracing Tinnitus Through Music For the last 25 years, I’ve shared my life with a…

    12 条评论
  • "The BBC’s Lifeline: How Internet Levies Could Save Britain’s Greatest Institution"

    "The BBC’s Lifeline: How Internet Levies Could Save Britain’s Greatest Institution"

    By Andrew Melchior The BBC has been more than a broadcaster for generations of Britons—it has been a cultural and…

    4 条评论
  • Manufacturing Division in an Age of Polycrisis

    Manufacturing Division in an Age of Polycrisis

    In 2019, the world to me seemed to visibly tremble under the rising tide of generational change. Greta Thunberg’s…

    6 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了