Esports Directors' Pay Crisis: The Silent Threat to Collegiate Esports' Future

In this week’s article I wanted to outline an issue that often flies under the radar, yet it's pivotal to the evolution of these programs: the salaries and stability of esports directors. Here's the current take for many programs: The current compensation for most esports directors is, frankly, inadequate. It's a controversial issue, for some it is delicate for? debate, but it's a conversation we need to have.

Why This Matters

Esports directors direct, organize and grow university esports programs. They don't just strategize wins; they build communities, foster talent, and bridge the gap between academics, skill development and competitive gaming. Their role is multifaceted, demanding a blend of coaching, management, and visionary leadership in most cases. Yet, when it comes to compensation, many find themselves compensated with salaries that barely reflect the complexity and demands of their role.

The Effect of Inadequate Salaries

The consequences of this undercompensation backfires the growth and stability of collegiate esports as a whole. Without competitive salaries and job stability, how can we expect directors to plant roots and cultivate long-term success within a single institution?

Consider the potential of a program where a director has the "agency to stay put at 1 university for 4-5 years." That continuity is invaluable. It means consistent leadership, long-term strategies coming to fruition, and a deeper connection with players and the university community.

Investing in the people leading our esports programs is as crucial as investing in the players themselves. We're at a crossroads where universities must recognize the worth and impact of their esports directors by offering salaries that match their contribution and ensuring job stability that allows them to truly invest in the program's future.

Some will argue it's not feasible for many programs due their early stage; others will say there are bigger issues at hand and there are many programs that fully fund themselves in the space. But if we're serious about the future of collegiate esports, about fostering environments where talent can thrive, and about elevating the industry standards, then ensuring our directors are adequately compensated isn't just a wish—it's a necessity.

We’re on the right track, Voice of Intercollegiate Esports is a great advancement. It’s a non-profit where presidents from many universities meet to discuss esports. The main objective is to discuss esports on campus and identify areas of improvement. There are also organizations collaborating with VOICE in charge of conducting the research of those key issues. VOICE will expand collegiate esports across universities and have a clear structure on resources needed, pay, the university administration understanding how an esports program will function on their campus increasing the chances for programs to succeed.?

Your Turn

What's your stance? Should the esports community push harder for better compensation and stability for directors, or are there other priorities we're overlooking? Let's get talking.

You can also follow me on X