ESG Reporting, ratings & rankings can bring recognition and improve performance, if we manage the complexities
Ulrike Sapiro
Chief Sustainability Officer @ Henkel | Corporate Sustainability Strategy, Policy & Governance | ESG | Advocate for Change
What a great kickoff to 2022!
I was delighted that Corporate Knights included Henkel in the "Global 100 Most Sustainable Corporations in the World" again earlier this month. Following the assessment of about 7,000 companies, they ranked Henkel as #2 in the “personal product companies” category. ?
While we are proud of such achievements, ratings and disclosures hold a deeper significance for our business.
?ESG ratings foster transparency and confirm that we are successfully implementing sustainability along the value chain and meeting our stakeholders’ expectations. Especially during the continued volatility of the pandemic, it’s important that Henkel closed out another strong year of recognition for its environmental, social and governance performance. One of a few successful ratings I feel is worth highlighting is EcoVadis, which again awarded us a platinum medal. This is their highest category that places us among the top 1% of all companies assessed. Another of note is the Sustainalytics, in which Henkel was rated as one of the world’s leading companies in the household products sector comparison and placed once again in the “low risk” category.???
But ESG ratings mean more than recognition. They are an important way to integrate the assessment of our ESG performance into our core business. For example, in 2018, we were the first German company to conclude a syndicated sustainability-linked loan, a credit line with terms tied to Henkel’s ratings performance. Three different sustainability rating agencies were included to ensure a balanced and comprehensive assessment our performance: EcoVadis, Sustainalytics and ISS ESG. Building on this debut, we announced our new Sustainable Finance Framework in 2021, which aims to align our sustainability strategy with our funding strategy more closely. This is one of many ways in which Henkel strives for innovation as a first mover – in this case, continuously pushing new boundaries in sustainable finance.
Finally, participating in disclosure is a way to validate our understanding of the leadership benchmark on key sustainability issues to inform our risk assessments and roadmaps going forward. For example, Henkel once again successfully participated in the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) in 2021. The CDP assesses qualitative and quantitative disclosure on the topics of climate change, water and forests. This year, we improved into the A- category in climate and forest/palm oil, and B for forest/timber and for water. These are great results that demonstrate our commitment to continuous improvement while highlighting some areas where we can still go further.
The diversity of recognition in ratings and rankings confirms we are in a good position to kick off 2022. We aim to continuously enhance our performance and drive our sustainable transformations with integrity.
领英推荐
For 2022, I expect ESG to gain further momentum and dynamics on multiple levels. New topics like the EU taxonomy, supply chain due diligence and reporting regulations will need to be integrated into company processes, reporting and resource allocations. New solutions for data management and evaluation will be vying for corporate and investor attention. More funds will be invested based on ESG factors, as Larry Fink recently indicated in his famous CEO letter. ESG performance and ratings will gain importance as a factor in companies’ sourcing decisions.
While this holds a lot of potential, it also poses challenges. Companies will face an ever-increasing demand for and complexity of information requests. Simultaneously, users of ratings and rankings will receive an ever-growing portfolio of perspectives and opinions on the companies they are considering for their investment or sourcing decisions. There is a potential for information overload.
Therefore, it will be essential to strike the right balance between innovation and continuity, diversity of opinion and standardization as well as artificial and human intelligence. We must work together to build a common understanding of where we can converge on standardization and strengthen materiality.
If we get this right, ESG ratings will help ensure that we and others move ahead meaningfully and transparently for years to come.
?
?
?
?
I want to help every sustainability research analyst to collaborate to advance your scoring methodology
2 年Thanks for sharing. We are glad to invite you to build a community with Scoring as the topic of our discussion for the year with the leaders across the globe. I would like to invite you to be a member of our community. https://bit.ly/73BitCommunityInvitation2
Fortune 500 Director | Chair Nom/Gov (NYSE: SHAK) | Former Global Chief DEI Officer, Coca-Cola | Inspiring Speaker | Amplifying Diverse Voices
2 年Transparency is the first step toward finding that new balance. Thanks for sharing, Ulrike.
Harvard Lecturer Emeritus | Uncertainty Risk Management | Pollution Prevention | Process Improvement | ESG | Organizational Sustainability | Author
2 年There are ratings that are used by companies and displayed each year in their annual reports (sustainability & company). The company " "annual reports" are used by investors in the capital markets. Your sustainability/esg report provides information to a host of stakeholders that have needs different than the financial stakeholders. Most of the the reporting organizations (e.g. SASB) are in the process of merging their business into the IFRS organization. The measurements will be changed to focus on the stakeholders in the capital markets on a global basis. https://lnkd.in/e3jy_tUt This is not a complexity. For years publicly traded companies submitted annual reports to the markets and annual reports using non-financial information to their other stakeholders. What is going on should have been changed about 20 years ago when the sustainability standards started making their appearance. In a couple of months, there will be a "consultation" on these issues. Keep your eyes on the URL provided above so you acn participate in that consultation. #centerforcps
Head of Sales & BD ????????
2 年Really inspiring! Thank you Ulrike Sapiro! I am a strong believer in data transparency and good ESG reporting to drive progress and optimization against ESG criteria and the role that digitalization can play to support these. Patrick Koegel Leo Paus have a read!
SVP of Accounts & Innovation at Datamaran, Member EFRAG Expert Working Group on EU Sustainability Reporting Standards
2 年Thanks for sharing Ulrike Sapiro. I’d be curious to hear your views on the double materiality v financial materiality debate