ESG reporting: Activity-based vs. spend-based methodologies
Getting quality and robust data is essential for ESG reporting. There are two main approaches to ESG reporting: spend-based and activity-based. Traditionally, the spend-based approach has been used, but there are many limitations to it. neoeco uses an activity-based approach to ensure that your measurements are robust and accurate.
Read on to find out more about the differences between an activity-based and spend-based approach and why activity-based is superior in terms of data quality.
Spend-based:
The spend-based approach uses financial transactions to report on and measure ESG impacts. While the spend-based method offers a straightforward way to track impacts, it has several limitations:
领英推荐
Activity-based:
The activity-based method concentrates on the specific actions and initiatives undertaken by the company to address ESG issues. This approach involves reporting on tangible activities, such as greenhouse gas emission reductions, waste management practices, diversity and inclusion programs, community engagement initiatives, and governance policies. This means that the gathered data and measurements are comprehensive and address all of your ESG impacts.
The activity-based method is considered superior for several reasons:
The activity-based method offers a more comprehensive and transparent representation of a company's ESG performance. This approach aligns with stakeholders' increasing demand for credible data regarding a company's sustainability efforts.
neoeco uses the activity-based method to ensure that your ESG measurements are as accurate as possible, representing your company’s environmental, social, and governance impacts.
Want to find out more about neoeco’s ESG reporting software? Get in touch and book your free demo ?? neo.eco/contact