Equality isn't about you, it's about us.

Equality isn't about you, it's about us.

Have you ever found yourself having a conversation about something that hurt a person or group of people you care about, only to have the person you’re sharing with make the situation about themselves?

Example 

Tom: My son is being bullied at school. 

John: He’ll be okay. I got bullied and I got over it.

BOOM. Right there. The breakdown in communication. Suddenly the conversation became about John. When people view the world, it’s usually through the lens of their own experience. Everything that happens is held up and examined through the perspective of “What would I do in this scenario?” This is why it’s hard to advance conversations of inequality with someone that has not had to experience another person's specific brand of discrimination. 

Systemic Racism. Women’s Rights. Land for Indigenous People. LGBTQ+ rights and marriage. Black Lives Matter. All terms and movements used to describe different forms of disenfranchisement. But they are also most often derailed by statements like 

“What I’ve seen in my experience..” 

“That’s never happened to me when…” 

“Well in my family…"

We rarely ever analyze how dangerous that really is. I'd say it's time for some deconstruction.

Most often, it starts from a good place. People react in disgust to what appears to be obviously hateful and wrong. Those same people have blanked out every instance they've heard a family member say something offensive. Or maybe the few times even they might've made a joke in poor taste, just for the shock value. We all do this. But suddenly, we find ourselves defending everyone that’s done an offensive thing that mirrors our own actions. This is internalized guilt, masked by offense.

The most public example of this phenomenon was Donald Trump’s “Grab her by the P***sy” incident. When the tape was leaked the internet and media collectively imploded. “How could Donald Trump say such horrible things about women?” Trump's campaign responded with a masterstroke of PR spin. They all but nullified the backlash with the term, "locker room talk.” Genius. Locker room talk is simply defined as guy talk. It lifted the target from Trump and spread it evenly across all men who have either engaged in that talk or condoned that language. More so, it implicated women that never spoke up against it, causing them to defend the men in their lives that they respect, despite the occasional lewd banter. To hold Trump accountable was to hold one's self accountable. And so suddenly, people rushed to his aid. Not because they cared about Trump, but because they didn’t want to accept responsibility themselves. What we should’ve done as a culture, and some people did, was taken this opportunity to reflect on ways we talk about women, in public and in private. Then consider that maybe we’ve marginalized women, as a society, in a way that we haven’t considered.

The context of equality is about social value. How do we, as a group, respond to an individual? If there are 10 people and six of those people exclude one person, the personal feelings of the remaining three don’t change the outcome. The system of exclusion is set by the majority. This gets even more complex when a few of those people hold more power than the others. Eventually, over time, even the few people with positive feelings begin to believe that the exclusion is happening for a good reason. The conscious efforts of the majority shift to unconscious bias from the whole. Implicit Bias develops from there. This is how systemic disenfranchisement works. 

Just because you aren’t racist (or don’t feel racist) doesn’t mean that racism does not impact a marginalized group or benefit you. If you applied for a job, how would you know if a black, Hispanic, or female candidate wasn’t denied the same job even though they had a similar resume? That maybe you were hired because you were a better “cultural” fit in the eyes of a well-intentioned HR manager? You wouldn’t know. This is how systemic discrimination and racism works so well. You didn’t actively discriminate so you’re not at fault, or so you feel. You've just benefited from someone else’s prejudice. As a man, I experience similar benefits. Maybe someone thinks I’d be more comfortable with “guy talk.” Therefore, because I wouldn’t be "too emotional" or "easily offended" I’m an easier hire than a similarly skilled or even more qualified woman. That's a thought process riddled with bias that is prevalent in our society today. 

Understanding one’s role in the system makes the conversation about equality a lot more digestible. We understand that most Americans aren't overtly racist or misogynistic. But we’ve all been indoctrinated to believe certain things about women, minorities, men, the list goes on, by media and social conditioning. Our job now is to begin to deconstruct the things we’ve been taught, often by those that were misinformed.

The final challenge we have to get over as a people is the most difficult. When rebalancing the scales, the group that has been unfairly given disproportionate power is going to have to give up a little. Equity is important here. Creating places for women, minorities, LGBTQ people means that some of the folks in the old boys club will have to either give up their seats or not pass those seats to friends. America has to re-evaluate aptitude, merit, and passing the torch. 

Equality vs. Equity Vs Liberation by Angus Maguire / Center for Story-Based Strategy / Interaction Institute for Social Change

If true equality is our goal, then equity is the pathway. Allowing diverse ideologies to fill in historically monochromatic and single gendered spaces can make those roles even stronger

"Equality isn’t just about you, me, or how we feel. It’s about all of us and how we can succeed together."

When someone says that America has a problem with racism, they are not talking specifically to or about you (unless you’re Richard Spencer, then we are). We're talking about power structures that were built to give some people an advantage over others many years ago. Structures don’t go away without being dismantled. We can’t ignore them out of existence. So let's get the wrecking ball of diversity and get reconstruction under way. 

------

Connect and follow for more articles on Branding, Marketing, Business, and Diversity.

Eric Thomas is a Branding Specialist and Senior Partner at Saga MKTG based in Detroit MI. He’s also an entrepreneur who never believes "the way it has been done" is the "way it must be done."

www.EricSThomas.com

Connect:  Linkedin | Twitter | Facebook | Instagram 


Michael Gardner

My purpose is to challenge and inspire ALL to embrace and manifest the magnificence and light of who they truly are!I coach a selective few who are committed to BE the difference they seek in the world.

7 年

Success is ultimately about all of us succeeding, and has nothing to do with equality. All of us using all of our abilities to create an ever increasing pie of opportunity, prosperity and abundance. It requires all of us to choose in to being contributors. Socialism does not create an environment of choosing. It is an environment of force where the majority rules and the minority is compelled to "volunteer". The idea that equality requires people in power to give up something is flawed.In success, in a win/win environment nobody gives up anything. We all grow. And, since we all grow from different starting points, the results for each will be different. The results will never be equal because we each have different skills, passions and desires and we don't all want the same thing as far as success. The idea that equality isn't about me, but us is flawed in that if each of us does not choose in willingly, but by force, then the results, as we see in countries that tried full on socialism, are stagnant and eventually lead to shortages and depravity, because there is no incentive for the individual if they feel they don't matter in the overall result. Or they feel like their desires are invalidated by the collective environment. Even the author of this article is giving his personal perspective on the issue. Based on his article, his opinion means nothing, since its' "not about him". Like it or not, abundance and prosperity is not achieved without contributions of massive individuals. Individuals forced by mandate will not produce the abundance that masses who individually choose to contribute do. It is about me, you, and the many you's that make us work together for the greater prosperity of all.

Donna Quinton Brown RN

Healthcare Advocate, Proud to be a Registered Nurse, CEO at Chronic Care Innovations, Inc.

7 年

Incongruous point. Saying everything is not all about you, everything is all about me...

Tobi Kester

Landscape Architect

7 年

If we were all born equal, it would be easier to try to maintain some sense of equality. But, right or wrong, we are born into so many forms of inequality that I think we are focused on the wrong thing by trying to create equality. Perhaps we should focus on teaching each how to more fully appreciate each other for all we are and can be, rather than trying to force people to be something we think they ought to be. Just my opinion.

Michael Kitchens

Engineering CAD Technician II at City of Chesapeake Department of Public Works

7 年

I also got bullied in school and I also got over it. That is a true statement about myself. Call it in-group bias if you wish, but it's the truth.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Eric S. Thomas的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了