On August 5, 2024, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in support of several states and industry groups seeking to stay the Environmental Protection Agency's new rule regulating greenhouse gas emissions from power plants.
Key points about the brief:
- It was filed by the Chamber of Commerce in support of applications from: State of West Virginia, et al., National Rural Electric Cooperative National Mining Association, et al., NACCO Natural Resources Corporation, Electric Generators for a Sensible Transition, Edison Electric Institute, et al.
- The brief argues that EPA exceeded its statutory authority under the Clean Air Act in setting emissions standards based on carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technology that has not been adequately demonstrated for power plants.
- It contends the rule threatens electric grid reliability by potentially forcing widespread retirement of fossil fuel plants without viable replacements. By the way, check out
Robert Bryce ??
's work "Juice the Series" here where Robert uncovers the truth behind the nation's powergrid reliability.
- The Chamber cites concerns from grid operators like MISO and PJM about maintaining reliable power supplies if the rule takes effect.
- The brief argues the economic costs of compliance would cause irreparable harm to regulated parties if the rule is later invalidated.
Potential ramifications if the Supreme Court grants the stay:
- Implementation of the EPA rule would be halted pending full judicial review, likely delaying emissions reductions from the power sector.
- It could signal skepticism from the Court about EPA's legal authority, potentially constraining future climate regulations.
- A stay would provide more time for the power industry to evaluate compliance options and grid reliability impacts.
- It may influence ongoing policy debates about the pace of the energy transition and role of fossil fuels.
The Court's decision on this stay request will be closely watched as a pivotal moment for U.S. climate policy and energy regulation. The involvement of the Chamber and multiple industry groups highlights the high stakes for the business community and energy sector.
What are your thoughts on the arguments presented and potential impacts of this case? I'd be interested to hear perspectives from those in the energy, environmental, and regulatory fields.
