Environmental value of telework in government (updated)

Environmental value of telework in government (updated)

It's been ~18 months since my last post about the State of California’s "Telework Dashboard", so this felt like a good time for quick update.

Since then, the California Department of General Services (DGS) and California Government Operations Agency (GovOps) has continued working with different departments across the State of California to include their telework data into this award winning dashboard. And they've made impressive progress.

133,045 humans across 99 departments

In March 2021, this dashboard showed real-time telework information from 12 agencies with a combined total of ~11,244 humans. Today, ~18 months later, this dashboard now shows real-time telework information from 99 agencies with a combined total of ~133,045 humans. With more still being added!

How telework combats climate change

This dashboard clearly shows the scale of the benefits of changing commute patterns using widespread, long-term #telework. Because these 99 agencies are allowing employees to #workfromhome, we can see that these agencies have reduced collective carbon emissions by 15,434 metric tons during the month of October.

15,434 metric tons saved in month of October2022

To understand a metric ton of CO2 and get a sense of the scale of this impact, I turn again to CarbonFootprint.com. They calculate that flying a plane nonstop from San Francisco to Washington DC, landing, refueling and then flying nonstop back to San Francisco generates 1.10 metric tons of CO2 emissions -- the pollution that contributes to the problem of #climatechange. The 133,045 humans at these agencies who “work remotely” for some (or all) of October 2022 reduced the carbon footprint of their combined commutes by the same amount as NOT making 13,421 round-trip flights between San Francisco and Washington DC, in just the month of October alone.?

Or to phrase it another way: canceling this telework policy and requiring all the humans at all these agencies to commute daily to their offices again would add the same carbon emissions as a policy decision to start flying 13,421 nonstop flights from San Francisco to Washington DC and back during the month of October. That's a new round-trip flight taking off from San Francisco every three minutes -- 24 hours a day, 7 days a week for the entire month of October.?

Setting the standard for a cleaner future

Looking at just this one aspect of the potential environmental benefits of long-term telework can help inform next steps for government agencies who are thinking about their long-term "telework" policies. These 99 agencies are already tackling hard climate change problems by:

pie chart showing multiple sources of carbon emissions
Emissions sources per California Air Resource Board

  • Focusing on the largest segment of emissions in the state (commuter traffic pollution according to the California Air Resource Board), then measurably reducing those emissions today by eliminating the need for staff to commute daily from home to the office and back home again.
  • Empowering staff to work effectively and securely from their homes, using modern, consumer-grade technology.
  • Automatically and publicly tracking the impact of these actions in order to make informed policy decisions for the future.

The California agencies contributing data to the live dashboard are showing admirable leadership in tracking the potential benefits of long-term telework at scale in the public sector and I get more delighted by the results as this work continues to scale. These forward-thinking policies, along with easily digestible info on this dashboard, are a powerful combination, with timely data helping inform smarter decisions and supporting a cleaner future for the government workforce. Thank you (again) to?Andrew Sturmfels,?Ann Baaten,?Gary Renslo,?Stuart Drown?and many many others for their continued hard work scaling this dashboard.

cc #WFH, #DistributedTeams, #Telework, #govtech

Kate Lister

Helping employers envision, sell, execute, optimize, and measure the results of transformational workplace change for nearly two decades. Let us help you make work, work better.

1 年

Sorry to be a party pooper, but while I've been one of the biggest proponents of distributed work as a strategy for reducing GHG, 'vehicle miles traveled' actually increased during the pandemic. Sadly, traffic fatalities did too. Was it due to a lack of trip chaining? Induced travel? Fear of public transportation and air travel? The good news is that distributed work did reduce congestion, one of the most polluting parts of the commute. While I still believe remote and hybrid work has the potential to positively impact the environmental, organizations and governments wanting to count it toward their ESG Scope 3 impact will need to do more than just assume the reduction is real. I'd be interested in the thoughts of others on this. Peter du Toit Nick Bloom Prithwiraj Choudhury Stella Ioannidou?Tsedal Neeley?Drew Clark Jack (John) M Nilles Charles Hardy AIA, CCM, Steve King Susan Handy Wendell Cox The VMT data: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-driving-soars-2021-up-112-2021-2022-02-18/

  • 该图片无替代文字
Rowena Hennigan

Leading the Remote Work revolution ?Head of Remote @ Nosana ? Board Member, Keynote Speaker & Advisor ? [in]structor ? Remote First Pioneer

1 年

amazing John O'Duinn (as always!) and thanks for highlighting Jamie. 15, 434 CO2 metric tonnes avoided! tagging a few people who may be interested: Peter du Toit Nick Bloom Prithwiraj Choudhury Ali Sheridan Stella Venturosa González? Tsedal Neeley Suzanne Bearne Kate Lister Chase Warrington Darren Murph ??Tyler Sellhorn?? Cloey Callahan

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了