Environmental protection = focus on the environment = timely care!
Lack of money for the work of biologists and researchers, due to the business community's continued demand for focusing on commercial issues.
The lack of effective environmental protection, where all kinds of scientists and biologists have been shouting loudly for over 50 years (FIFTY YEARS) without it having aroused enough interest among the world's decision makers! See link to section 3 in Main Article 07 https://lnkd.in/ekQVeprf
The lack of interest is the main reason for Global Warming!
Against this background, it is not enough to wait for chaos before reacting - as we are now seeing with Global Warming!
Biologists and researchers must have access to the necessary financial means to make real and up-to-date tests in order to slow down and preferably stop all inappropriate processes before they run wild.
Using universities for these tasks often results in inappropriate political agendas, where it is always the needs of business that determine what needs to be researched - rather than the needs of reality, which cannot always be commercialized.
A turning point or a game changer could be to assign biologists, researchers, geologists and engineers a much greater degree of independence and decision-making responsibility if they work in independent teams within climate-related topics, which MUST be financed via 100% independent funds, to ensure against inappropriate outsiders influence – in the same way that we propose that the water fund and its sister fund and watchdog Whistleblower and the Ombudsman's fund should operate.
领英推荐
See link to main article 08 with blue header on how 100% independence can be achieved via donation-funded establishment for the first three years of operation until self-financing is achieved by selling production licenses ONLY to governments https://lnkd.in/eTcPjkVY
?
Next article 09.056 and the subsequent four articles incl. the conclusion, which is published every six days from 13 November 2024, contains descriptions of the scope of measures whose overall aim is effective environmental protection.
?
Make a real diff – Repost!
European Commission Ursula von der Leyen European Investment Bank (EIB) Nadia Calvi?o European Central Bank Christine Lagarde The World Bank International Monetary Fund Kristalina Georgieva African Development Bank Group United Nations African Union ECOWAS Commission ECOWAS Bank for Investment and Development (EBID) Dr. Omar A Touray NATO EIT Food WWF Jeff Opperman CNN John Vause Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change & the Environment ASU Water Institute Upmanu Lall Gravercentret – The Danish Centre for Investigative Journalism Danwatch R?det for Gr?n Omstilling Bjarke M?ller Oxfam International Greenpeace International Fridays For Future International ActionAid Zambia
Sustainability Administrator @ Integrated Care 24 | Completing MSc Global Environment and Sustainability
3 周Agreed Lars. There is a vast gap to be bridged between those directly (from the scientific community) involved in the climate space and policymakers who's initiatives shape the behaviour of nations' inhabitants. At present it feels like only those scientific climate agents calculating our fate are the ones who understand the urgency, while governments focus on the commercial side of our economy despite the undeniably connection between our natural resources and business activity! Without the Earth and it's resources there is no business. Access to independent funds will ensure those who truly have the climate's best interest at heart can lead decisive action.