The Ensh*ttification of ChatGPT

In recent years, a new term has surfaced in the digital lexicon, capturing the essence of a troubling trend observed across major technology platforms. Coined by Cory Doctorow, "Enshittification" describes a process by which once-innovative and user-centric online services systematically degrade in quality as they shift their focus from user satisfaction to maximising profits. This term has resonated widely, reflecting the shared experiences of countless users who have watched their favourite digital havens become cluttered marketplaces driven by commercial interests rather than user needs.

Doctorow introduced "Enshittification" to articulate a common trajectory among digital platforms, where initial user-friendly, value-driven services gradually prioritise revenue generation over the original core experience. This often results in platforms overrun with intrusive advertisements, diminished usability, and manipulative content designed to lock users into more restrictive and monetised interactions.

As platforms evolve from their nascent, user-focused stages into mature, revenue-focused enterprises, the quality of the user experience often needs to improve. This pattern is not merely incidental but appears to be an almost inevitable phase of digital platform maturation, as observed in companies like Amazon, Facebook, and Uber. Each began with a revolutionary promise of better service and user empowerment, only to later pivot towards strategies that significantly prioritise profit, sometimes at the expense of user satisfaction and trust.

The Concept of Enshittification

The term "Enshittification" can be described as a three-stage process through which digital platforms degrade, each stage marked by a distinct shift in the platform’s priorities and strategies.

Attraction Phase

• Focus on User Acquisition and Satisfaction: Platforms concentrate on building a large user base by offering high-quality services, often at a loss. This stage is subsidised by venture capital or initial funding to attract as many users as possible by providing exceptional value.
• Golden Era for Users: This period is considered the golden era for users, where platforms often exceed user expectations in service quality and cost efficiency.
• Examples: In the early days, companies like Uber offered rides at significantly lower prices than traditional taxis, and Facebook provided a clean, ad-free social networking experience, starkly contrasting with the cluttered interfaces of its predecessors.

Lock-in Phase

• Shift Toward Engagement and Dependency: Once a substantial user base is established, the platform shifts its focus towards increasing user engagement and dependency.
• Introduction of Profit-Maximizing Features: Platforms might start tweaking algorithms to prioritise engagement over quality content, introduce premium service tiers, or subtly increase the presence of ads.
• Design Changes to Coerce User Behaviour: The platform design subtly coerces users into behaviours that align more closely with revenue generation goals than user satisfaction. For instance, a platform might begin to prioritise content that keeps users scrolling longer, even if it's not the content they find most valuable.

Exploitation Phase

• Maximisation of Profits: In this final stage, platforms exploit their now locked-in user base and suppliers to extract maximum profits. Aggressive monetisation strategies characterise this phase.
• Significant Increases in Monetisation Efforts: This includes significant increases in advertising, introducing high fees for previously free services, and squeezing suppliers or content creators through unfavourable terms.
• Decline in Quality and Increased Commercialisation: The quality of service markedly declines during this phase as the platform's focus turns almost exclusively to profit maximisation. The user experience becomes heavily commercialised.
• Use of Market Dominance: The platform may leverage its market dominance to impose these changes with little regard for user backlash. For example, Amazon's increasing fees for sellers and the prioritisation of its products in search results show how the platform benefits from its stronghold on suppliers and consumers.

Case Studies of Enshittification

Uber

• Revolutionary Start: Initially transformed urban mobility with lower costs and app-based convenience compared to traditional taxis.
• Surge Pricing: Introduced surge pricing that increased ride costs during peak times, often exceeding traditional taxi fares.
• Expansion into Uber Eats: Extended the monetisation strategy to food delivery, where pricing for items often far exceeded in-store costs due to added fees.
• Uber One Subscription: Introduced to ostensibly reduce delivery and service fees, but effectively encourages users to utilise Uber more frequently to justify the subscription cost.

Netflix

• Disruptive Entry: Originally offered a single, affordable subscription plan with unlimited access to a broad content library.
• Introduction of Multiple Tiers: Segmented the subscription into multiple levels, including a basic service with ads, a standard service, and a premium service offering 4K streams.
• Impact on User Experience: The tiered structure complicated the user experience and eroded the initial value proposition by varying access and quality based on price.

Amazon

• Customer-Centric Approach: Started as a user-friendly marketplace offering vast selection and low prices.
• Shift Toward Profit Maximisation: Prioritised Amazon’s products in search results and introduced complex fee structures for third-party sellers.
• Algorithmic Preference: Adjusted search algorithms to favour products that yield higher revenue for Amazon than those that best match consumer queries.

Social Media Giants (Facebook, Instagram)

• Free and Open Platforms: Initially attracted users with the promise of a free space for social interaction and content sharing.
• Prioritisation of Paid Content: Gradually adjusted algorithms to favour paid advertisements and sponsored content over organic user-generated content.
• Reduced Organic Reach: Changes made it increasingly difficult for users without advertising budgets to see their content, pushing towards a pay-to-play model.

Some Possible Enshittification Scenarios for OpenAI's ChatGPT

Future 1: Tiered Access Degrades Basic Service Quality

• Attraction Phase: OpenAI launches ChatGPT as a revolutionary free tool, rapidly gaining widespread adoption due to its advanced AI capabilities.
• Lock-in Phase: OpenAI introduces ChatGPT-4 as a premium version with advanced features available only via subscription, while the free version suffers from reduced functionality and infrequent updates.
• Exploitation Phase: The quality of the free version of ChatGPT declines significantly; critical features like timely responses and complex query handling are restricted to premium tiers. The service might introduce frequent ads and limit the number of interactions per session, pushing users towards the subscription model. (This has already happened across many AI platforms). This approach mirrors tactics seen in digital platforms like LinkedIn's basic versus premium access, where essential networking tools are paywalled to encourage premium subscriptions.

Future 2: Over-Monetisation through Add-Ons and Hidden Costs

• Attraction Phase: OpenAI offers a seemingly transparent, flat-rate subscription for full access to its most capable models.
• Lock-in Phase: Over time, OpenAI begins to introduce additional cost services such as priority prompt processing or premium content generation, touted as enhancements to the user experience.
• Exploitation Phase: The basic subscription becomes increasingly inadequate as more features require additional payment, leading to a complex and costly structure. This model reflects the gaming industry’s approach, such as seen in Electronic Arts' video games, where essential gameplay elements are hidden behind paid expansions or micro-transactions, diminishing the value of the initial purchase.

Future 3: Quality Erosion Due to Market Dominance

• Attraction Phase: OpenAI establishes itself as a leader in AI technologies, making ChatGPT the go-to service for developers and consumers.
• Lock-in Phase: As OpenAI focuses on expanding its market reach, the pace of genuine innovation slows. The platform might prioritise integrating ChatGPT into commercial applications, potentially at the expense of user privacy or data security.
• Exploitation Phase: With its dominant market position, OpenAI could impose restrictive policies such as limiting interoperability with other platforms or introducing high fees for API access. This scenario is similar to Google’s strategy with its Android operating system, where the integration of Google services and restrictions on third-party alternatives have been subject to regulatory scrutiny. The quality of service might decline as the platform emphasises revenue extraction from its vast user base over continued innovation or maintenance.

Integrating Insights from Other Tech Firms

The trajectories above integrate observed strategies from other big tech firms that have led to consumer dissatisfaction and regulatory attention. Each possible future scenario for OpenAI's ChatGPT involves an initial phase of user-centric value followed by a shift towards maximising profits at the user's expense, a typical pattern in the tech industry. This gradual shift often leads to a degraded user experience, reduced innovation, and increased consumer lock-in. By studying these patterns, I hope OpenAI might avoid such pitfalls by maintaining a balanced focus on innovation, user satisfaction, and ethical standards, ensuring that growth and profitability preserve the quality of service and trust. Everyone, cross your fingers and toes now!

My article was influenced by:

This video by Mr. WhoseTheBoss (Arun Maini) Thanks!

This Wikipedia page.

This Financial Times article.

and this bit on LastWeekTonight with John Oliver.

#AI, #Enshittification, #DigitalTransformation, #TechTrends, #UserExperience, #CoryDoctorow, #AIInnovation, #OpenAI, #ChatGPT, #TechMonopoly, #AIRegulation, #TechEthics, #AIEthics, #ConsumerExploitation, #BigTech, #AIPlatforms, #SubscriptionFatigue, #ServiceDecline, #MonetisationStrategies, #TechIndustryCritique, #FutureOfAI