The Engagement Paradox: How Chasing It Can Make You Lose It
Engagement should be the key indicator of a customer's authentic interest in the content presented to them.
But
When you optimize for engagement, you often end up reducing it. Here’s why.
When most people think about engagement, they picture activity—clicks, likes, comments, or shares. Engagement is often calculated as the number of interactions divided by the number of views. This definition equates engagement with action, implying that the more someone interacts with a piece of content, the more engaged they are.
According to Webster’s Dictionary, engagement is defined as “emotional involvement or commitment.” So, who’s right? Is engagement about measurable actions, or is it an internal emotional experience? Let’s dive deeper.
The History of Engagement: A Short but Rich Story
In Western thought, the concept of engagement has a surprisingly brief history. The first philosopher to use the term explicitly was Jean-Paul Sartre in the mid-20th century. Sartre defined engagement (l’engagement) as a conscious commitment to action. For Sartre, engagement was about knowingly choosing to act or commit.
Sartre’s ideas were influenced by Martin Heidegger, who introduced the concept of being-in-the-world (Dasein)—a state of meaningful, active participation in life. Interestingly, Eastern philosophy had addressed engagement centuries earlier. Zen Buddhism, for example, encourages mindfulness and full immersion in the present moment, offering a timeless perspective on what it means to engage truly.
Engagement vs. Interaction: The Goodhart’s Law Problem
If engagement is about emotional involvement, why do we measure it by counting interactions?
This discrepancy can be explained by Goodhart's Law, which states: “When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.” Metrics like clicks, likes, and shares were originally proxies for engagement because they were easy to track. However, optimizing for these metrics has led to strategies that inflate numbers without fostering genuine emotional connection.
领英推荐
Why Metrics Fall Short
While interactions provide a starting point, they fail to capture the depth of engagement:
By optimizing for these metrics, we risk improving KPIs while failing to drive actual outcomes like loyalty, sales, or meaningful participation.
How to Foster Real Engagement
We need strategies that cultivate genuine emotional and social involvement to move beyond surface-level metrics.
1. Focus on Emotional Resonance
2. Create Opportunities for Shared Experiences
Conclusion: Engagement Is Emotional and Social
Engagement is far richer than the number of clicks or comments a piece of content generates. It’s an emotional and often social experience that can be just as powerful when quiet or introspective.
The next time you evaluate engagement—whether in a meeting, an event, or a social media campaign—look beyond the numbers. Consider the depth of connection and the emotions sparked. Sometimes, the most engaged person in the room isn’t the one talking but the one who’s truly listening.