Enabling Sustainable Infrastructure Maintenance

Summary

This article investigates the critical role of Infrastructure Maintenance (IM) in achieving sustainability within the GB railway infrastructure. The evolution of maintenance philosophies is traced, highlighting the shift from reactive approaches to the proactive, data-driven paradigms of Maintenance 4.0 and the emerging Maintenance 5.0.

The diverse landscape of IM techniques is explored, emphasising their implications for environmental, social, and economic sustainability. A crucial link is established between sustainability and maintenance, underscoring the need for full integration into the railway manager’s IM strategy. The transformative potential of Maintenance 4.0 technologies in enabling Sustainable Infrastructure Management is defined.

A structured decision-making framework, incorporating sustainability criteria, Maintenance 4.0 technologies, and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques, is proposed to empower informed, data-driven decisions that optimise asset performance and contribute to a more sustainable railway network.

Infrastructure Maintenance and Sustainability are fundamentally interconnected, the opportunity is at hand for a proactive, data-driven approach that leverages technological advancements and prioritises sustainability considerations to ensure the long-term viability and societal value of GB railway infrastructure.

1. Introduction

In the face of growing environmental issues and societal concerns , and the urgent need for sustainable practices, the railway industry faces the challenge of balancing operational efficiency with responsible business practice. This challenge is particularly pertinent for the GB railway infrastructure owner and manager, charged with maintaining a sprawling, complex, growing and increasingly used network while minimising its sustainability footprint .

This article will explore the crucial role of the Infrastructure Maintenance discipline in achieving sustainability within the GB railway infrastructure owner and manager. The evolution of maintenance philosophies is traced, the diverse terrain of Infrastructure Maintenance technique is explored, a light is shone on the meaning and application of sustainability practice, and the relationship between Infrastructure Maintenance and Sustainability is then mapped.

The purpose of this review is to highlight a need, and to propose a structured decision-making framework for creating and selecting sustainable maintenance strategies, empowering the railway infrastructure manager to make informed, data-driven decisions that optimise asset performance and contribute to a smarter, safer and greener rail network.

2. What is Infrastructure Maintenance?

The railway regulator, the Office of Rail and Road (ORR) , defines Infrastructure Maintenance (IM) as ‘the process of maintaining asset condition by regularly inspecting it and intervening to improve its condition and sustain its performance, when necessary, via a maintenance activity’.

In practice, IM on the railway encompasses a wide range of activities, including inspections, surveys, repairs, replacements, and modifications of various assets such as the permanent way (the track system), signals, telecommunication and electrification systems, drainage, earthworks and structures. Increasingly, natural capital assets such as habitats and trees are also being conceptualised as maintainable infrastructure. Maintenance activities are guided by a combination of maintenance techniques, including corrective, preventive, predictive and symbiotic maintenance, each tailored to the specific needs and criticality of different assets.

From an organisational perspective, IM is a complex and multi-disciplinary function that involves collaboration and coordination between various teams, including engineers, asset managers, maintenance managers, frontline technicians, planners, and external supply chains.

3. Evolution of infrastructure maintenance philosophy

The landscape of industrial maintenance has undergone a remarkable transformation over the past century, reflecting a progressive evolution in response to technological advancements, economic pressures, and a growing understanding of asset management. This evolution can be broadly viewed as passing through distinct generations, each defined by a unique philosophical approach and accompanying set of maintenance tools:

First-Generation Maintenance (1940-1955) - the early decades of industrialisation were marked by a reactive approach to maintenance, often referred to as ‘run-to-failure’ or ‘breakdown maintenance’. In this paradigm, equipment was operated until it failed, at which point repairs or replacements were undertaken. This philosophy prevailed in an era of relatively simple machinery, limited understanding of failure mechanisms, and a focus on immediate cost reduction. However, the reactive nature of First-Generation Maintenance often led to unplanned downtime, production losses, and safety hazards.

Second-Generation Maintenance (1955-1975) - the limitations of run-to-failure maintenance became increasingly apparent as industrial systems grew in complexity and criticality. This realisation paved the way for Second-Generation Maintenance, characterised by the emergence of Preventive Maintenance (PM). PM is a proactive approach that involves scheduled inspections and component replacements based on time or usage intervals, aiming to prevent failures before they occur. The shift was facilitated by development of reliability engineering principles and the emergence of Computerised Maintenance Management Systems (CMMS) to streamline maintenance planning and scheduling. While PM represented a significant advance over reactive maintenance, its effectiveness was often constrained by a lack of precise knowledge about equipment degradation rates and the potential for unnecessary interventions.

Third-Generation Maintenance (1975-2000) - the late 20th century witnessed a technological revolution that enabled a more targeted and efficient approach to maintenance: Condition-Based Maintenance (CBM). CBM leverages real-time monitoring of asset health through sensors and data analysis to trigger maintenance actions only when warranted by the actual condition of the asset. This approach represents a significant departure from the time-based or usage-based interventions of PM, allowing for more optimised maintenance schedules and reduced downtime. CBM has been widely adopted in industries where unplanned downtime can have severe consequences, such as aviation, power generation, oil and gas production and, of course, the railway.

Fourth-Generation Maintenance (2000-Present) - a digital transformation, often referred to as Industry 4.0, has ushered in the fourth generation of maintenance, or Maintenance 4.0, characterised by Predictive Maintenance (PdM). PdM leverages data-driven insights to predict equipment failures before they occur, enabling proactive interventions and optimisation of maintenance schedules. Two phases have emerged during this era:

• Predictive Maintenance, initial phase (2000-2015): the initial phase of the Fourth-Generation saw the widespread adoption of predictive technologies, utilising statistical models and machine learning algorithms to analyse historical and real-time data to forecast asset health and remaining useful life. While limited by the computational power and data availability of the time, PdM during this time marked a significant shift toward proactive maintenance, reducing unplanned downtime and improving asset utilisation.
• Predictive Maintenance, second phase (2015-Present): recent breakthroughs in artificial intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT) have revolutionised PdM, ushering in a new era of predictive capabilities. The integration of advanced AI algorithms, coupled with the proliferation of IoT sensors and real-time data streams, has enabled more accurate and granular predictions of equipment failures. Furthermore, the ability to process and analyse vast amounts of data in real-time has empowered organisations to make proactive decisions, optimise maintenance strategies, and achieve unprecedented levels of asset reliability and operational efficiency. This second phase is synonymous with the Maintenance 4.0 paradigm (see section 10).

Fifth-Generation Maintenance (emerging) - already, such is the pace of change, the line is blurring between Maintenance 4.0 and a new Maintenance 5.0 concept. Fifth-Generation Maintenance envisions a paradigm shift where human-centric design, sustainability, resilience, and personalisation are principal. In almost ecological terms, the concept considers a symbiotic relationship between humans and machines, leveraging advanced technologies to augment human skills and creativity. This goes beyond the technology predicting failures and is about humans and machines working together to make the best maintenance decisions.

4. Infrastructure Maintenance intervention techniques

The discipline of physical asset maintenance is built up of a dynamic and evolving set of techniques and strategies aimed at optimising asset performance, reliability, and longevity. While the overarching objective remains the preservation of asset functionality, the toolkits employed to achieve this goal have progressed significantly, spurred by technological advancements and a deeper understanding of asset degradation mechanisms. Three primary categories of maintenance strategy are considered here - corrective, preventive, and predictive - with a fourth - symbiotic - referenced, along with associated techniques:

Corrective Maintenance (CM) - run-to-failure maintenance is the most rudimentary and historically prevalent approach to asset maintenance. The CM technique entails addressing infrastructure malfunctions only after a failure has occurred. While this approach might seem economically attractive in the short term due to the deferred nature of expenditure, unforeseen breakdowns disrupt performance or production schedules, which can lead to substantial financial losses and the jeopardy of operational efficiency. Moreover, equipment failures pose safety risks to the workforce, potentially customers or local communities, and the environment. And the cost of rectifying a failure after it occurs often surpasses the expenses incurred in preventing it through proactive maintenance. However, CM may be suitable for non-critical assets, where the repercussions of failure are minimal and the cost of downtime is negligible. CM may also be strategically integrated with other maintenance strategies as a fall-back option for unforeseen breakdowns or for assets nearing the end of their service life.

Preventive Maintenance (PM) - marks a proactive departure from the reactive nature of CM, encompassing a spectrum of techniques aimed at pre-empting equipment failures through scheduled maintenance activities. The underlying philosophy of PM is that regular inspections, component replacements, and other proactive interventions can mitigate the risk of breakdowns, extend asset lifespans, and enhance overall system reliability.

• Time-Based Maintenance (TBM), also known as periodic maintenance, is a cornerstone of the PM strategy, requiring delivery of maintenance tasks at predetermined intervals or based on usage thresholds, irrespective of the actual condition of the asset. This approach is often guided by manufacturer recommendations, industry best practices, or historical data on equipment failure rates. The strength of TBM lies in its simplicity and predictability, facilitating maintenance planning and resource allocation. However, it can lead to over-maintenance and unnecessary costs if the maintenance intervals are not aligned with the actual degradation patterns of the asset.
• Condition-Based Maintenance (CBM), represents a more sophisticated and adaptive approach to PM, leveraging real-time monitoring of equipment condition through sensors and data analysis to trigger maintenance actions only when warranted. This approach allows for a more targeted and efficient allocation of maintenance resources, minimising unnecessary interventions and extending asset lifespans. CBM has gained prominence in recent years due to advancements in sensor technologies, data analytics, and the increasing affordability of monitoring systems.
• Risk-Based Maintenance (RBM), is a proactive maintenance strategy that prioritises maintenance activities based on the criticality and potential consequences of asset failures. This techniques involves a systematic assessment of risks associated with different failure modes, considering factors such as safety, environmental impact, and economic losses. By quantifying and prioritising risks, RBM enables organizations to allocate maintenance resources more effectively, focusing on assets and components that pose the greatest threat to operations.
• Reliability-Centred Maintenance (RCM), is a comprehensive methodology that goes beyond simply preventing failures and aims to preserve the inherent functions of an asset. This approach involves a detailed analysis of asset functions, functional failures, failure modes, and their consequences. By understanding the criticality of each function and the potential impact of failures, RCM enables the development of optimised maintenance plans that ensure asset reliability and availability while minimising costs.

Opportunistic Maintenance (OM), is a complementary strategy that can be integrated with PM techniques. OM involves performing maintenance tasks on an asset while it is already down for other reasons, such as planned maintenance or repairs on another component. Such an approach aims to minimise downtime and optimise maintenance costs by leveraging existing opportunities for intervention. OM can be particularly effective in complex systems where multiple components are interdependent and downtime on one component can impact the operation of others.

Predictive Maintenance (PdM), has long stood at the frontline of maintenance innovation, harnessing the power of real-time data, sensors, and advanced analytics to predict equipment failures before they occur. This proactive approach enables organisations to intervene at the optimal time, minimising downtime, optimising maintenance costs, and enhancing asset performance. PdM is closely intertwined with the ongoing digital transformation of industries, with later developments referred to as Maintenance 4.0 (section 10). While CBM focuses on diagnosing the current condition of an asset, PdM extends this capability by predicting its future behaviour and remaining useful life. This predictive capability is achieved through the integration of advanced analytics and machine learning algorithms that can identify subtle patterns and trends in equipment performance data, enabling organisations to anticipate failures and take proactive measures to prevent them.

Symbiotic Maintenance (SM), is, at the time of writing, emerging from the advancements of PdM and Maintenance 4.0, and represents the latest evolutionary stage of maintenance. The technique envisions a deeper integration of human expertise and artificial intelligence, fostering a collaborative relationship where technology augments human skills and decision-making. Symbiotic Maintenance goes beyond prediction and prevention and aims to empower maintenance professionals with real-time insights and decision support tools, enabling them to make informed, proactive choices that optimise asset performance, sustainability, and resilience.

5. Current railway Infrastructure Maintenance strategy

Maintenance strategy at Network Rail (NR) is undergoing a pivotal transition , moving away from traditional reactive and time-based approaches towards a more proactive, predictive, and technology-driven model. This strategic shift is primarily motivated by the need to enhance asset reliability and availability, optimise maintenance costs, and address the challenges posed by an aging infrastructure and constrained budgets. The strategy is underpinned by several key principles that are evident across various initiatives within the organisation:

Transition to Predictive Maintenance - an overarching theme is the determination to move from reactive maintenance to a proactive and predictive approach that anticipates and addresses potential issues before they escalate into service affecting disruptions. An interim goal on this journey is to embed RBM principles across all maintenance disciplines. Real-time monitoring of asset condition to trigger maintenance actions is also gaining traction, with areas like signalling and electrification benefitting from CM systems that are being more widely deployed. PdM is viewed a key enabler for achieving a significant reduction in service-affecting failures, particularly in the context of 'Predict and Prevent' initiatives.

Embracing technology and innovation - technology and innovation are recognised as crucial for modernising NR maintenance practices and achieving its strategic objectives. Maintenance strategy increasingly emphasises the adoption of innovation such as drones, robotics, and AI for asset inspection, data collection, and analysis, and the company is also exploring the potential of digital twins and other Industry 4.0 technologies to optimise maintenance planning and execution.

Focus on efficiency and productivity - improving the efficiency and productivity of maintenance operations is a core tenet of NR's IM strategy. Key initiatives include Modernising Maintenance, which aims to streamline working practices and optimise resource allocation, activity-based planning and decision-support tools, smarter maintenance rostering tools, and mechanisation and automation. For example, the deployment of Plain Line Pattern Recognition (PLPR) has significantly improved the efficiency, consistency, and safety of track inspection.

Managing asset deterioration and renewal constraints - the infrastructure manager is grappling with an aging asset base and constrained renewal budgets. The maintenance strategy emphasises a risk-based approach to asset management, prioritising interventions based on asset criticality and the potential consequences of failure. A personal interest in this space for me, for example, is drainage maintenance and vegetation management to mitigate climate-related risks.

And this is a further emerging aspect of the strategic approach to IM that is of interest for the purposes of this article:

Addressing climate change and resilience - for many years, I and others, have exhorted for a step-change in urgency and investment to the challenges posed by climate change and extreme weather events. The commitment to enhancing the resilience of railway infrastructure is now substantially growing , and IM has a role to play in the mitigation of climate-related disruptions and ensuring the continued safe and reliable operation of railway network.

This connects neatly to the interface with sustainable development as there is a hard link between climate adaptation and the concept of sustainability. However, the other principles of IM are also aligned to sustainability of the infrastructure and its management practices. But how? And what does sustainability mean in the context of the railway infrastructure manager?

6. What is sustainability?

Sustainability for the railway infrastructure manager, in my view as a practitioner of some years , means the integration of environmental, social, and economic considerations into the core business model of infrastructure management, ensuring a resilient, inclusive, and thriving railway network for present and future generations.

Environmental considerations - Network Rail's environmental sustainability strategy primarily revolves around mitigating its impact on the planet and adapting to the challenges of climate change. The key considerations include:

• Climate Change Resilience: preparing the railway infrastructure to withstand the impacts of climate change, such as extreme weather events and globally rising temperatures. The strategy emphasises embedding resilience into all aspects of asset management, from design and construction to operation and maintenance.
• Decarbonisation: reducing carbon emissions from various sources, including traction (powering trains), energy used in stations and offices, and emissions associated with construction and maintenance activities. The strategy aims to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2050 (2045 in Scotland).
• Air Quality: improving air quality by reducing harmful pollutants from diesel trains, road vehicles, and other sources. Specific targets include a 25% reduction in harmful pollutants in Network Rail-managed stations by 2030.
• Biodiversity: protecting and enhancing nature and natural capital across the railway estate. This includes sustainable land management practices, creating and maintaining habitats for wildlife, and working in partnership with neighbouring landowners and stakeholders. The goal is to achieve no net loss of biodiversity by 2024 and a net gain by 2035 (from a baseline taken in 2020).
• Circular Economy and Waste Reduction: minimise waste and promote the sustainable use of materials by reusing, repurposing, or redeploying surplus resources, designing out waste and plastic pollution, and embedding circular economy thinking.

Social considerations - the NR social value framework highlights the importance of maximising positive social impacts and managing negative ones. The key considerations include:

• Economic Prosperity: supporting economic growth and development by providing employment and training opportunities, fostering a resilient and innovative supply chain, and supporting local businesses.
• Equal Opportunity: promoting inclusivity and diversity across the rail network and within the workforce. This includes improving accessibility for people with disabilities, increasing the representation of disabled people in the workforce, and tackling inequality in employment, skills, and pay.
• Wellbeing: enhancing the physical and mental well-being of individuals and communities impacted by Network Rail's activities. It includes supporting the health and safety of passengers and the public, managing the negative impacts of rail activities (e.g., noise and air pollution), and collaborating with communities in the design and delivery of projects.

Economic considerations - while not explicitly outlined as a separate pillar in the sustainability strategy, key economic considerations include:

• Cost Efficiency: optimisation of maintenance costs and improving efficiency through initiatives such as modernising maintenance practices, adopting technology, and implementing risk-based approaches.
• Asset Management: managing asset deterioration and renewal constraints within limited budgets. This involves prioritising interventions based on asset criticality and applying innovative to asset life extension and refurbishment programs.
• Value for Money: the overarching goal is to deliver a safe, reliable, and efficient railway network that provides value for money for both passengers and freight customers. To do this requires a focus on balancing costs with service quality and sustainability outcomes.

The rail infrastructure manager recognises the interconnectedness of all these factors and aims to create a railway network that is not only environmentally responsible but also socially inclusive and economically viable, and delivers the outcomes in my sustainability definition above of:

Resilient - build a railway network that can withstand the challenges posed by extreme weather events and other disruptions, ensuring continued service and minimising downtime.

Inclusive - create a network that is accessible and inclusive for all, particularly those with disabilities.

Thriving - cultivate a railway that supports economic prosperity, enhances community well-being, and protects and enhances the natural environment.

7. Current railway Sustainability strategy and its relationship with Infrastructure Maintenance

The concept of IM is implicitly woven into the fabric of the NR Sustainability strategy:

• Environmental Sustainability Strategy indirectly references maintenance when discussing the need to adapt and improve existing infrastructure to withstand the impacts of climate change. The Strategy also touches upon maintenance when addressing the lifecycle of assets and the importance of sustainable material choices and waste reduction in construction and maintenance activities.
• The Social Value Framework indirectly acknowledges maintenance through its focus on the well-being of individuals and communities impacted by Network Rail's activities. This includes managing the negative impacts of rail activities, which could encompass noise and disruption associated with maintenance works.

However, I propose that an explicit link between maintenance and sustainability is necessary and not just a matter of semantics; it is a crucial step towards embedding sustainability into the core of Network Rail's IM strategy and ensuring that maintenance practices contribute to a more resilient, inclusive, and environmentally responsible railway network. The rest of this article outlines an approach to achieving this outcome.

8. Sustainability and Infrastructure Maintenance - alignment of considerations

The concept of sustainability, encompassing environmental, social, and economic considerations, is intrinsically linked to the practice of infrastructure maintenance. These three aspects must guide the development of strategies that align with both the key requirements and outcomes of infrastructure maintenance from an asset management perspective and the broader sustainability requirements and goals.

Environmental considerations in Maintenance

The environmental aspect of sustainability in maintenance focuses on minimising the negative environmental impact of both maintenance activities and potential asset failures. This includes:

• Reducing emissions and pollution: the adoption of greener technologies and practices in maintenance activities, such as using electric or hybrid vehicles for inspections and repairs, can significantly reduce carbon emissions and air pollution. The transition to renewable energy sources for powering maintenance depots and worksites further contributes to decarbonisation efforts.
• Resource efficiency: efficient maintenance practices can extend the lifespan of assets, reducing the need for new materials and minimising waste generation. Implementing circular economy principles, such as reusing and recycling materials, can further reduce the environmental footprint of maintenance activities.
• Biodiversity protection: maintenance activities can impact biodiversity, particularly through vegetation management and land use practices. Adopting sustainable approaches that prioritise habitat conservation and ecological restoration can help maintain and enhance biodiversity along the railway network.
• Climate Change Adaptation: as climate change leads to more frequent and severe weather events, maintenance strategies need to adapt to ensure the resilience of infrastructure. This includes proactive measures to mitigate the impact of flooding, high winds, and extreme temperatures, as well as incorporating climate change considerations into asset design and maintenance planning.

Social considerations in Maintenance

The social aspect of sustainability in maintenance encompasses the safety and well-being of both the workforce and the wider community, including passengers, freight customers, and lineside residents.

• Workforce safety and well-being: ensuring the safety and well-being of maintenance staff is the number one priority. This includes providing adequate training, promoting safe working practices, and minimising exposure to hazards. Additionally, fostering a positive work environment that supports the physical and mental health of employees is crucial for a sustainable workforce.
• Public safety and amenity: maintenance activities should be conducted in a manner that minimises disruption and inconvenience to passengers and the public. This includes managing noise and vibration levels, ensuring accessibility for all users, and communicating effectively with communities about planned works.
• Community engagement and Social Value: maintenance cycles and projects can create opportunities for positive social impact, such as providing employment and training opportunities for local communities and supporting local businesses. Engaging with stakeholders and understanding their needs can help maximise the Social Value generated by maintenance activities.

Economic considerations in Maintenance

The economic aspect of sustainability in maintenance emphasises the financial implications of maintenance decisions, including costs, downtime, and the consequences of asset failures.

• Cost optimisation: efficient maintenance strategies can lead to significant cost savings by reducing unplanned downtime, minimising repair costs, and extending asset lifespans. The adoption of proactive and predictive maintenance approaches, coupled with the use of technology and data analytics, can help optimise maintenance expenditure and improve overall cost-effectiveness.
• Asset Value preservation: effective maintenance practices help to preserve the value of infrastructure assets, ensuring their long-term functionality and minimising the need for premature replacements.
• Operational efficiency: well-maintained infrastructure is essential for efficient and reliable train operations. By minimising disruptions and delays, effective maintenance practices can enhance the overall performance of the railway network, leading to improved customer satisfaction and economic benefits.

9. Integration of Sustainability into Infrastructure Maintenance Strategy

This article, I hope, makes clearer the alignment and interconnectedness between infrastructure maintenance and sustainability. The shift towards proactive and predictive maintenance, coupled with the adoption of technology and innovation, aligns with the environmental goals of reducing emissions, minimising waste, and enhancing asset resilience. The focus on workforce development, collaborative working with stakeholders and community engagement demonstrates a commitment to social sustainability.

A logical extension is that aligning maintenance practices with environmental, social, and economic sustainability goals will positively contribute to the long-term goal of a resilient, inclusive, and thriving railway network for present and future generations. However, consideration must be given to how each maintenance technique contributes to this goal:

Corrective Maintenance and Sustainability - while inherently reactive, CM can still play a role in a sustainable maintenance strategy when applied judiciously. CM can lead to increased environmental impact due to unplanned disruptions, potential for emergency repairs requiring additional material and energy resources, and the possibility of secondary damage to surrounding areas. However, for non-critical assets with low environmental impact upon failure, CM can be a justifiable approach from a resource conservation perspective. The economic implications of CM are often negative, as unplanned downtime can lead to significant financial losses and disruptions to operations. However, for assets with low criticality and predictable failure modes, CM can be a cost-effective option if the cost of preventive or predictive maintenance outweighs the potential cost of failure. Finally, CM can negatively impact the social dimension of sustainability due to service disruptions, safety risks, and potential environmental damage. However, in specific contexts, such as managing assets nearing the end of their service life, CM can be a pragmatic approach that avoids unnecessary maintenance expenditures and resource use.

Preventive Maintenance and Sustainability - with its proactive approach to preventing failures, PM has a stronger inherent link to sustainability compared to CM. PM regimes should be optimised to improve asset availability and reliability to deliver the timetable and meet wider businesses objectives. Decision-making should balance whole-life costs, risk, and performance, aligning with the principles of sustainability. By reducing the likelihood of unplanned breakdowns and associated disruptions, PM can contribute to lower emissions and resource consumption. PM techniques like CBM, which optimises maintenance intervals based on actual asset condition, can further enhance resource efficiency. RCM, with its focus on preserving asset functions, can also promote sustainability by extending asset lifespans and minimising the need for replacements. NR environmental sustainability strategy will adapt Standards to include circular economy aspects, which could influence PM practices to favour reuse and recycling of materials. PM can lead to significant economic benefits by reducing downtime, improving asset reliability, and optimising maintenance costs. The upfront investment in preventive measures can be offset by long-term savings from avoided failures and improved operational efficiency. PM alsocontributes to social sustainability by enhancing safety and minimising disruptions to services. By ensuring the reliable operation of the network, PM supports the mobility needs of passengers and freight customers, contributing to economic and social well-being.

Predictive Maintenance and Sustainability - PdM, with its data-driven and proactive approach, has the potential to significantly enhance sustainability outcomes. The technique is expected to be a key enabler for achieving a significant reduction in service-affecting failures, which aligns with the sustainability goals of improving reliability and minimising disruptions. PdM enables precise and timely interventions, minimising unnecessary maintenance and reducing the environmental footprint of maintenance activities. By extending asset lifespans and optimizing resource use, PdM contributes to a more circular and sustainable approach to asset management. The environmental sustainability strategy theme of minimising waste and embedding circular economy thinking resonates with the principles of PdM. The economic benefits of PdM are expected to be substantial, as it can significantly reduce downtime, optimise maintenance costs, and improve asset utilisation. The ability to predict failures and plan interventions in advance allows for better resource allocation and cost control. The use of Intelligent Infrastructure and data analytics to make better planning decisions about investments in assets should be a significant economic advantage of deploying PdM. PdM enhances safety by proactively identifying and addressing potential risks before they lead to failures, and also improves service reliability, minimising disruptions and enhancing the overall passenger experience, contributing to the social well-being of communities and individuals reliant on the railway.

Opportunistic Maintenance and Sustainability - as a complementary strategy, OM can further enhance the sustainability benefits of other maintenance approaches, particularly within preventive maintenance. By leveraging existing downtime for maintenance activities, OM reduces the need for additional access to the railway, minimising disruptions and associated environmental impacts. OM improves cost efficiency by reducing the overall downtime required for maintenance and optimising the use of resources, contributing to the economic sustainability of maintenance operations. OM can contribute to social sustainability by minimising disruptions to train services and improving the overall efficiency of maintenance operations, leading to a more reliable and accessible railway for passengers and freight customers.

?

In summary, each maintenance technique, when applied strategically and in conjunction with others, can contribute to the environmental, social, and economic dimensions of sustainability. By adopting proactive and predictive approaches, leveraging technology and innovation, and prioritising resource efficiency and social well-being, Network Rail can ensure the long-term sustainability of its infrastructure and operations. Conversely, IM needs to be enabled by clear targets and metrics related to environmental, social, and economic impacts, and the continuous evaluation and improvement of its maintenance practices.

10. Role of Maintenance 4.0 in Sustainable Infrastructure Maintenance

The advent of Maintenance 4.0, characterised by the convergence of digital technologies, automation, and data exchange, presents a transformative opportunity for the rail infrastructure manager to enhance the sustainability of maintenance practices. By leveraging these technologies, Network Rail can achieve a more proactive, efficient, and environmentally responsible approach to asset management. Key Maintenance 4.0 technologies include:

Internet of Things (IoT) - deployment of IoT sensors and devices across the railway network can enable real-time monitoring of asset condition and performance. This data can be used to identify potential issues before they escalate into failures, enabling proactive maintenance interventions that minimise downtime, reduce resource consumption, and extend asset lifespans.

Big Data Analytics - vast amounts of data generated by IoT sensors and other sources can be harnessed through big data analytics to gain deeper insights into asset behaviour, degradation patterns, and environmental impacts. Such information can be used to optimise maintenance schedules, identify energy-saving opportunities, and develop more sustainable maintenance practices.

Cloud Computing - provides a scalable and flexible platform for storing, processing, and analysing large volumes of maintenance data. CC enables real-time access to information, facilitates collaboration between different teams and stakeholders, and supports the development of advanced analytics and decision-support tools.

?

Digital Twins - virtual replicas of physical assets can be used to simulate the impact of different maintenance strategies on asset performance, reliability, and sustainability. This allows for a more proactive and informed decision-making process, enabling asset and maintenance managers to evaluate trade-offs between different criteria and identify optimal maintenance approaches that balance technical, economic, environmental, and social considerations.

Augmented Reality - AR can be used to provide maintenance technicians with real-time information and guidance during inspections and repairs. The technology can improve the accuracy and efficiency of maintenance activities, reduce the risk of errors, and enhance worker safety.

Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing) - 3D printing can be used to produce spare parts on demand, reducing the need for inventory and transportation, and minimising waste. This can contribute to a more circular and sustainable approach to maintenance, particularly for unique, obsolete, or hard-to-find components.

?

The adoption of Maintenance 4.0 technologies can therefore be expected to deliver several tiers of benefits for a sustainable maintenance paradigm, including improved asset performance and reliability, increased resource efficiency, reduced environmental impact, improved safety and wellbeing, and cost avoidance and savings.

The emergence of Maintenance 5.0 - while Maintenance 4.0 has yet to fully mature, the concept of Maintenance 5.0 is already being developed. In this new phase, the 4.0 technologies above are not just tools for prediction and prevention but enablers of a deeper collaboration between human expertise and artificial intelligence. Real-time data streams from IoT sensors, processed and analysed through cloud computing and big data analytics, feed into digital twins and AR interfaces, providing maintenance professionals with unprecedented insights and decision support. The integration of collaborative robots (cobots) is forecast to further enhance this synergy, allowing humans and machines to work side-by-side, leveraging each other's strengths.

This human-AI-machine collaboration allows for more informed, proactive, and sustainable maintenance practices. Technicians will be able to make real-time decisions on the ground, guided by the latest data and predictive models. Engineers and maintenance managers can visualise complex asset systems through AR, identify potential issues before they escalate, and create optimised solutions that balance technical, economic, environmental, and social considerations. The focus on customisation and agility, supported by an agile supply chain and additive manufacturing, will enable maintenance practices to adapt to the unique needs and challenges of each asset and situation.

11.? Developing a structured decision-making framework for Sustainable Infrastructure Maintenance strategy selection

The selection of an optimal maintenance strategy is a complex decision-making process that involves balancing multiple, often conflicting, criteria. Traditionally, this process has been dominated by monetary and technical asset considerations, often overlooking the broader environmental and social impacts. However, the growing emphasis on sustainability and the advent of Maintenance 4.0 technologies necessitate a more holistic and data-driven approach to maintenance strategy selection.

Network Rail's sustainability strategy and IM narratives highlight a clear intent to transition towards proactive and predictive maintenance practices, underpinned by technological innovation and data analytics. This strategic shift presents an opportunity to embed sustainability considerations into the core of the decision-making framework for maintenance strategy selection.

The core of an enhanced decision-making framework for Network Rail lies in its ability to integrate sustainability considerations with the advancements of Maintenance 4.0. This can be achieved by developing and implementing the following key elements in sequence:

Step 1. Establish a clear sustainability vision - NR and IM sustainability goals and objectives need to be clearly defined, ensuring they are SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound). These goals should of course encompass environmental, social, and economic dimensions, addressing the core issues such as carbon emissions reduction, biodiversity enhancement, climate resilience, stakeholder well-being, circular economy, and cost-effectiveness. The IM strategy should have a clear sustainability vision which is fully aligned with the corporate sustainability strategy.

Step 2. Identify and prioritise sustainability criteria - develop a comprehensive list of sustainability criteria relevant to maintenance decision-making. This should include a wide range of factors across the three aspects of sustainability. For example:

Environmental criteria:

• Energy consumption: the amount of energy required to implement and execute a maintenance strategy.
• Raw material consumption: the quantity and type of materials used for maintenance activities.
• Waste generation: the amount and type of waste produced during maintenance operations.
• Emissions and pollution: the release of greenhouse gases, air pollutants, and other contaminants into the environment.
• Resource depletion: the consumption of finite natural resources, such as water and minerals.
• Biodiversity impact: the effect of maintenance activities on the value or diversity of plant and animal life in the surrounding environment.
• Climate change resilience: the ability of the maintenance strategy to adapt to and mitigate the impacts of climate change, such as extreme weather events and rising temperatures.

Social Criteria:

• Safety: the safety of maintenance workers, passengers, and the public during and after maintenance activities.
• Health and wellbeing: the physical and mental health of the workforce and the impact of maintenance activities on the health of surrounding communities.
• Community engagement: the extent to which maintenance activities involve and benefit local communities.
• Accessibility and inclusivity: ensuring that the railway network remains accessible and inclusive for all users, including those with disabilities.
• Social value creation: the positive social value generated by maintenance activities, such as job creation, skills development, and community development initiatives.

Economic Criteria:

• Cost-effectiveness: the overall cost of implementing and executing a maintenance strategy, including direct costs (e.g. labour, materials, equipment) and indirect costs (e.g. downtime, lost production).
• Asset longevity: the ability of the maintenance strategy to extend the lifespan of assets, delaying the need for costly replacements.
• Operational efficiency: the impact of the maintenance strategy on the overall efficiency and reliability of the railway network.
• Return on investment: the financial return generated by the maintenance strategy over the long term.

Once a comprehensive list of sustainability criteria has been developed, it is essential to assign weights to these criteria to reflect their relative importance in achieving Network Rail's sustainability goals. This can be done through internal and external expert consultations, stakeholder engagement, or other appropriate methods. Tools like the RSSB Rail Social Value Tool (RSVT) can help quantify and monetise social value outcomes, for example, which can aid in prioritisation.

Step 3. Select an appropriate MCDM technique - the selection of an optimal maintenance strategy often involves juggling multiple, and sometimes competing, objectives. Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques offer a structured and systematic approach to address this complexity. In essence, MCDM provides a framework to evaluate and rank different options (in this case, maintenance strategies) based on their performance across a range of criteria (in this case, criteria such as the ones identified in step 2 above).

MCDM allows for the simultaneous consideration of various criteria, both quantitative (e.g. cost, reliability) and qualitative (e.g. environmental impact, social acceptance), to arrive at the most preferred alternative. Three main MCDM approaches are available at the time of writing this article:

Data-driven MCDM approaches - leverage the power of data and machine learning algorithms, analyse large datasets to identify patterns, trends, and relationships between different criteria and alternatives. The approach can lead to more objective and data-informed decisions, especially when dealing with complex problems and vast amounts of information.

Fuzzy-based MCDM approaches - extend traditional MCDM technique by incorporating fuzzy logic to handle uncertainty and vagueness in decision-making. Particularly useful when dealing with qualitative criteria or subjective judgments, allowing for a more realistic representation of real-world decision-making scenarios. Fuzzy-based MCDM acknowledges that decision-makers often express their judgments in linguistic terms (like ‘good’, ‘fair’ or ‘poor’) rather than precise numerical values.

Hybrid MCDM methods - combine the strengths of multiple MCDM techniques or integrate MCDM with other approaches like machine learning and optimisation algorithms. The goal is to create a more robust and comprehensive decision-making framework that can handle the complexities and uncertainties of real-world problems.

Step 4. Incorporate Maintenance 4.0 technologies - leverage the capabilities of Maintenance 4.0 technologies to integrate real-time data from sensors, monitoring systems, and other sources into the decision-making process. The tech enables a more dynamic and adaptive approach to maintenance strategy selection, allowing for adjustments based on the actual condition and performance of assets. Then, utilise advanced analytics and machine learning algorithms to analyse the collected data and extract meaningful insights into asset health, performance, and potential failure modes. Develop predictive models that can forecast the remaining useful life of assets and the likelihood of failures under different maintenance scenarios. Digital twins of critical assets and infrastructure components can be created to simulate the impact of different maintenance strategies on asset performance, reliability, and sustainability. Use these simulations to evaluate trade-offs between different criteria and identify optimal maintenance approaches.

?Step 5. Decision-Making and Maintenance Strategy Selection - incorporate the insights gained from data analytics (and digital twin simulations) into the chosen MCDM technique. This could involve adjusting criteria weights, updating alternative ratings, or incorporating new criteria based on real-time data and predictive models. The goal is to create a decision model that reflects the most up-to-date information on asset condition, performance, and potential risks. Conduct scenario analysis and sensitivity testing to evaluate the robustness of the decision model and identify potential risks and uncertainties. This will help ensure that the chosen maintenance strategy is adaptable to changing conditions and capable of delivering sustainable outcomes even in the face of unforeseen events. Experience shows that enabling collaboration and knowledge sharing among different stakeholders involved in the maintenance strategy selection process at this stage will substantially increase the quality of the outcomes... and ensures that the chosen strategy is not only technically sound but also aligned with the diverse needs and expectations of all parties involved.

Step 6. Implementation and Continuous Improvement - translate the chosen maintenance strategy into actionable business plans, with specific maintenance tasks, timings, resource allocation, and performance metrics. Verify that the plans incorporate sustainability considerations and align with the broader organisational goals. Establish a robust monitoring and evaluation system to track the performance of the implemented maintenance strategy against the defined sustainability goals. Utilise real-time data and analytics to identify any deviations from the expected outcomes and make necessary adjustments to the strategy. Encourage feedback and learning from both successes and failures, and use these insights to refine the decision-making framework and enhance the sustainability of maintenance practices over time.

By adopting this enhanced and refined framework and implementation strategy, the rail infrastructure manager can make more informed and data-driven decisions about maintenance strategies, optimise asset performance, and achieve its sustainability goals in a more efficient, effective, and collaborative manner.

End of maintenance shift summary

The integration of sustainability into Infrastructure Maintenance practices is not merely an ethical imperative; it is a strategic necessity for ensuring the long-term viability of the railway network. I hope this article makes clear the relationship and its importance.

The landscape of IM is evolving rapidly shifting towards proactive, predictive, and technology-driven approaches. The transformative potential of Maintenance 4.0 technologies in enabling Sustainable Infrastructure Maintenance I also hope has been underscored.

Network Rail's ongoing transition towards a more sustainable IM model is encouraging. However, the explicit integration of sustainability considerations into maintenance decision-making remains crucial. The proposed decision-making framework in this article, leveraging data analytics and Maintenance 4.0 technologies, offers a pathway for the railway infrastructure manager to make informed choices that balance operational efficiency with environmental, social and economic responsibility.

As the railway industry continues to evolve, the role of IM in achieving sustainability will only become more pronounced. By embracing proactive maintenance strategies, leveraging technological advancements, and prioritising sustainability considerations, Network Rail can lay both foundations and track for a journey that leads to sustainable infrastructure, that serves both present and future generations to come.

??

Views in this article represent the author’s personal opinions only.