En-route navigation

En-route navigation

Required track accuracy and system functionalities are detailed in each Navigation Specification.

Over the next decade, the European mandate will require:

  • RNAV 5 on the en-route ATS route structure
  • RNAV 1 as a minimum for SIDs, STARs and transitions
  • RNP APCH for each instrument runway end (IRE)

En-route segments

Aircraft fly from waypoint to waypoint (sometimes referred to as flying 'To-To-To').

The turn performance of the aircraft is determined by the waypoint definition (flyover, fly-by or FRT) as well as altitude, aircraft speed and wind.

Turn performance varies depending on altitude, angle of turn, wind and speed. Systems having Fixed Radius Transiton (FRT) capability (an optional functionality to support en-route RNP Navigation Specifications) will provide better and more repeatable turn performance.

To guarantee predictable and highly repeatable flightpaths when turning, FRTs can be used.

  • DO236C/ED75D, the industry standard, provides recommended FRT values:

22.5NM above FL200,

15NM below FL190.

It should be noted that the FRT functionality is only available on modern aircraft and not all aircraft can execute this type of turn.


There are extra functionality options, such as FRT and Baro VNAV, which any State or Region may choose to mandate for certain Navigation Specifications pertinent to the en-route phases of flight.



FRT Option - Area of applicability

For access into oceanic/remote continental airspace some Navigation Specifications can only meet this with ‘high continuity’.

These options are detailed either in the Navigation Specification, or the Appendices in Part C of Volume II of the PBN Manual.

They apply almost exclusively to RNP Navigation Specifications.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

shakeel ahmad的更多文章

  • Benefits of PBN

    Benefits of PBN

    Benefits of PBN Some of the benefits of RNAV SIDs and STARs and RNP APCHs are as follows: improves situational…

  • Terminal Airspace Navigation

    Terminal Airspace Navigation

    Terminal Airspace Navigation Approach Historically there were two types of approach: Precision Approaches (PAs)…

  • Benefits of PBN

    Benefits of PBN

    Benefits of PBN Introducing RNAV or RNP applications in en-route may enable a reduction in spacing between routes…

  • NAVAID Infrastructure

    NAVAID Infrastructure

    Introduction Navigation Application is one of the three components of Performance Based Navigation (PBN) together with…

  • Flex takeoff weight

    Flex takeoff weight

    The flex takeoff weight of an aircraft is a reduced thrust takeoff method used to minimize engine wear, reduce fuel…

  • ARINC protocols

    ARINC protocols

    ARINC protocols are a set of standards developed by Aeronautical Radio, Inc. (ARINC) to facilitate communication and…

  • ARINC: A Foundation for Aviation Data Communication

    ARINC: A Foundation for Aviation Data Communication

    ARINC (Aeronautical Radio, Inc.) is a global organization that develops and maintains standards for aviation…

  • Guidance for Dispatchers in the North Atlantic High-Level Airspace (NAT HLA)

    Guidance for Dispatchers in the North Atlantic High-Level Airspace (NAT HLA)

    The North Atlantic (NAT) airspace is a critical air traffic corridor, requiring stringent operational standards…

    1 条评论
  • Reduced Contingency Fuel Procedure (RCF) Regulations

    Reduced Contingency Fuel Procedure (RCF) Regulations

    Reduced Contingency Fuel Procedure (RCF) Regulations allow an airline to calculate lower than standard contingency fuel…

  • Difference between Terminal Aerodrome Forecast (TAF) and Terminal Area Forecast

    Difference between Terminal Aerodrome Forecast (TAF) and Terminal Area Forecast

    The terms Terminal Aerodrome Forecast (TAF) and Terminal Area Forecast are often confused due to their similar names…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了