Employee Protests and Walkouts Over Vaccine Mandates.
Paul Hilton
President at Paul Hilton, Human Resources Consulting, LLC and Owner, Paul hilton, Human Resources Consulting, LLC
COVID-19 continues to present challenges to employers who are generally obligated under Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations, to provide their employees with a safe and healthy workplace. One of the most significant present challenges is addressing employee protests over mandatory vaccination policies. Such protests may include groups of employees confronting management at the workplace, distributing flyers to coworkers, picketing outside the property, or even striking. Employers may be surprised to learn that workers have significant rights in this area – regardless of whether they are part of a unionized workforce. However, employers also have important rights as well, so it is critical to understand where the lines can be drawn. Here is a summary of employer rights and obligations when it comes to vaccine protests and walkouts and a list of key considerations they should keep in mind as this situation develops.?
Government Vaccine Mandates
Beyond the Executive Order requiring?most federal contractors to mandate that covered employees be fully vaccinated by December 8. OSHA is finalizing?a sweeping Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) mandating that private employers with 100 or more employees either ensure their workers are vaccinated against COVID-19 or require unvaccinated employees to produce a weekly negative test result before coming to work. Unfortunately, many employees may view these requirements as presenting an ultimatum of choosing between their jobs and their beliefs. There have already been widespread reports of employee protests and walkouts in various parts of the country in response to the federal contractor mandate, and anticipate similar employee activity in response to the ETS.
The first question to ask is what rights these employees actually have when it comes to such activity.
Group Protests Over Vaccine Mandates Likely Constitute Protected Concerted Activity
Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects workers at both unionized and non-unionized workplaces who engage in concerted activity for the purpose of mutual aid and protection. Not only does this cover union organizing activity, but it also covers protests over wages, hours, and working conditions.
In late March, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued?Memorandum GC-21-03, which signals the Board’s intention to more aggressively enforce employees’ Section 7 rights. The GC Memorandum lists examples of employee advocacy involving “vital categories of workplace life” that the Board would find to be “inherently concerted” – and therefore protected – including complaints about racial discrimination and workplace health and safety. Based on this latest guidance and the Board’s long history of broadly construing the NLRA to protect workers’ rights, employers should assume that employee protests and walkouts related to mandatory vaccination policies will likely be deemed protected concerted activity
This is true regardless of whether the activity is in response to your organization’s decision to implement a mandate in direct response to a government order (e.g., federal contractors, healthcare organizations, and large employers) or merely because you want to promote a safer and healthier environment. Employee protests over an employer’s decision to?not?implement a mandatory vaccination or testing policy altogether, or your decision to implement one but not the other, likely would also be protected, because employees may reasonably fear their employer is not doing enough to protect them.
How Employers Should Address Employee Protests Over Vaccine Mandates
As a general rule, employers should address employee protests over vaccine mandates the same as they would address any other form of protected concerted activity. You should understand that any discussion of protected activity under the NLRA is a highly technical area of the law involving subtle fact-sensitive distinctions between lawful and unlawful conduct, but with significant ramifications from a remedial standpoint. For this reason, you should tread cautiously and bring your labor counsel into your discussions before you take significant steps. However, here are some general considerations to keep in mind.
A company’s best defense against the potential expense and aggravation related to federal or state law violations is to proactively review and revise as needed all Human Resources policies, handbooks, hiring procedures, compensation, benefits, training programs, communications tools and other functions.?