Emergency Housing was created by this government
John Kenel
20 Years of Property Development Success Secrets Packed into One Course - Join The Property Development Club Today!
Emergency housing barely existed before Jacinda’s government rose to power. In the last year, the Hardship Fund, from which social support including emergency accommodation grants and accommodation supplements are drawn, spent nearly $535m - over $200m more than the previous year. Much of this money is being paid to motel operators.
The rising cost is a direct result of changes to government legislation regarding landlords. As I’ve been saying for years now, this government has the sequence wrong. They need to build the social housing before they stop private housing providers from providing housing. They are doing the opposite. They are pushing private property owners out of the market and pushing children into motels.
Before Jacinda’s government we didn’t have people living in motels. Another thing you didn’t see was Kaianga Ora housing with multiple tin sheds strewn across their section with children living in them (outside rooms, with no bathrooms, and I bet not warm and dry - but then KO doesn’t have to comply with Healthy Homes legislation). You didn’t see entire streets of motels filled with families, with young kids, in horrible overcrowded, unsafe and unacceptable conditions.
This is what happens when you let your ideologies get in the way of simple, practical thinking. New Zealand needs private individuals to provide rental housing, that's a fact. And yes, we probably need more social housing for the growing number of people who can’t take care of themselves. But you have to build the social housing before people can live in it. Jacinda’s government has to stop attacking private home owners who choose to rent their houses to tenants. They are offering a very important service and one that's very hard for government to replicate, at least any time soon. Government should be working with private landlords, encouraging them to to build even more new housing, but again they are doing the opposite.
I have land that I was going to build long term rental housing on for my own account. I could start building right away. But I’ve put the plans on hold. Why? Because I don’t know what a new build is under the new rushed anti-landlord legislation. Government has not provided any information on what a new build is. What they have said is that you’ll still be able to claim interest on new builds. But what is a new build? Is it a house bought off the plans? Is it a house that has had code of compliance within the last 3 years? 5 years? 10 years? How long can you claim the interest for on a new build? 1 year? 5 years? As long as there are no details, I cannot commit capital to building new housing. And I’m not alone. A lot of developers and investors are sitting on their hands right now waiting to see what Jacinda will come up with next.
In the meantime, children and vulnerable adults will be living in sub-standard conditions thanks to this government’s decisions. Like the 9 year old girl who I saw come out of what is no doubt a cold, damp little shed on a Kainga Ora property next to one of my rentals a few days ago. She has to walk through the cold and rain to get inside to use the bathroom, she’s not even living in a house. She had a school uniform on. It made me think of my own daughter and the very different way in which she starts her day.
This is not fair. It’s not fair that Jacinda is so focussed on trying to stop some New Zealanders from saving for their retirement through property, that she’s prepared to make children live in these conditions. What did that little girl do to deserve camping instead of living in a house?
It’s not OK and was completely avoidable. This government is directly responsible for the ‘emergency housing’ situation. They made it too risky for landlords to house anyone without a perfect record. Landlords can’t afford to give someone a chance as it’s so hard to get them out. Fixed term doesn’t mean fixed term any more so some people are keeping houses empty rather than renting out for a few months, along with many other unintended effects.
Where did they think those people would go when private landlords turned them away? People can’t live in housing that hasn’t been built yet.
Why are people not talking about this? Why is it OK to make children live in motels and sheds? Do we really not care what this government is doing to those most in need?
John Kenel
Assured Property
Founder Joint Home Ownership Ltd (New Zealand), The Black Dog, Throuple (dating app Google Play Store), Bitcoin Real Estate.
3 年Seriously this has been happening since they opened the immigration up to the Islands in the 1950's. So this is not new with people living in outbuildings of some form or manner. The Government have the answer in front of them but are too stupid to sort this. Also why spread the construction market out so Social Welfare dependant people have to travel wide and far. Build property closer to industry and transport this is logical to rehabilitate beneficiaries back into the work force. Why spend over $30m a week on emergency housing they created a new problem. They need to do a 2 year plan and condense the emergency housing to areas they are going to relocate people back into once they rebuild from scratch. We don't have the luxury of 1/4 acre sections that is a pipe dream for these people so go up and build with support. If they spend $30m a week or $1.5b a year how many houses can that build? $1.5B down the drain per annum only filling providers pockets as against the Government getting a capital gain on owning the property which they need to do so the TAX payer can see they are being prudent with our TAX money.
Financing. Connecting. Empowering. Governing. Coaching & Mentoring.
3 年Great article John and spot on the issue of timing - I doubt if it will make the media though as it might be at the risk of being shut out if you ask too many hard questions aka @Mike Hoskings - how about it Tova O'Brien Patrick Gower or Jessica Mutch McKay
CEO CA - Portfolio and Investment Director
3 年I agree John, and I am doing the same. Not building any new houses until I have surety on the new rules, which have no details. I house several families as well and have done more than my fair share, but there has to be a limit on how much a person can do.
Student at University of Waikato Bachelor of Laws (LLB)
3 年Well said John. Do you mind if I share?
MARKETING/CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS/CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE MANAGEMENT
3 年Well said, John.