The emergence of new risk in the banking industry
THE FUTURE EMERGING NEW RISK FOR A GLOBAL BANK, NEW TOOLS FOR RISK MANAGEMENT
?INTRODUCTION
?The progress in science and technology has been making human life easier. It has made a profound long impact in every sphere of human life and livelihood, i.e., finance business, service, industry, health, communication, learning, etc. Globalization and a free economy in many countries have made global mobility of trade and human resources created multi types of new opportunities.
?Naturally, the probability of functions in banks basically would be totally diverse. According to the latest trend, it may be assumed that the forward ten years in risk management would be undergoing through major transformation than the last decade. So, to be agile and resilient, this is imperative for banks to formulate promptly for these long-term variations which could be helpfully address emerging new necessities and calls which they like to encounter. The operational drifts are driving various of these extensive shifts stemming from multiple sources. Regulation will continue to broaden and deepen as the public will feel zero tolerance for any presence of avertible errors and unsuitable business principles and practices. Concurrently, customers’ expectations of banking services will need innovation congruent with the latest technology and the development of emerging new business models. Risk functions will also have to deal with the progression of newer types of risk (e.g., model, contagion, and cyber), which necessitate novel skills and tools. Fortunately, advanced technology and augmented analytics are empowering innovative products, services, and risk-management techniques, while unbiased prescriptive norms and approaches that boost decision-making will equip better risk managers to form improved solutions of risks. Probably, the impending advent of activity and purpose will be capable to bring against all these demands and ward off these trends economically, to prune down banks’ operating expenses.?
As such the risk function is possible to shoulder wide-ranging duties engaging at a strategic policy level and to have robust, collaborative tie-up with other parts of the bank. Concurrently, its experts will be possessed wide experience a gigantic shift in proficient analytics and bigger collaboration, and away from operating progressions that can be judiciously automated, real-time, and completely digital. IT and data will be more cultivated often recollecting big data and complex algorithms. Resultantly, ?the risk function may be able to make better risk results at lower operating costs while creating superior customer experiences. If banks want their risk functions to thrive during this period of ultimate transformation, it needs to reconstruct them during the next decade. To beat the competition, they need to start now with a portfolio of initiatives that balance a strong short-term business case with enabling the long-term achievement of the foresight vision. Such initiatives could include digitizing the underwriting processes, the use of machine-learning techniques, and interactive risk reporting. They should be complemented by enablers such as a shift in recruiting toward more technology-savvy profiles or the introduction of data lakes. However, to succeed, this transformation could also require a shift in the organizational risk culture—the adoption of an approach that embeds shared and communicated values and principles throughout the organization.
Risk management in banks has changed significantly over the past ten years. The regulations that emerged from the global financial crisis and the fines that were levied in its wake triggered a wave of change in risk functions. These comprised comprehensive and difficult capital, leverage, liquidity, and funding want, and improved r standards for risk reporting, such as BCBS 239. The management of nonfinancial risks became vital as the standards for compliance and conduct were constricted. Stress testing emerged as a major supervisory tool, in parallel with the rise of expectations for bank risk-appetite statements. Banks also invested in strengthening their risk cultures and involved their boards more closely in key risk decisions. They also sought to further delineate their lines of defense. Given the magnitude of these and other shifts, most risk functions in banks are still in the midst of changes that respond to these increased demands.
Since the beginning of the 21st century, it was unimaginable that risk functions could have changed so rapidly momentum. a fallacy to envisage a reduction of risk in the oncoming few years. Nobody has any link concrete idea about oncoming banks’ risk functions architecture by 2025, or what financial disasters or disruptive technological will alter .risk ?management. But based upon the foresight of whoever has expertise in bank risk management, some key structural drifts are emerging which would require new insights related to banks’ risk management in the ensuing years ahead. A few people have the capability who foresee other transformations that would prove a major impact on unpredictable risk functions who are able to detect some potent eminent key trends and also clarity to depict a new perspective of the future risk function.
?1.?RULES AND REGULATION
?The scope of regulation will keep enlarging driven by four crucial factors. ?First, public and hence government tolerance for bank failures has shrunk since the global financial crisis, and the appetite for interventions using taxpayers’ money to save banks has evaporated. After 2008, new regulations focused on the expansion of the regulatory framework by tightening micro-and macro-prudential regulation across the board. Open items still include the future of internal models for the calculation of regulatory capital and the potential use of a standardized approach as a floor; for instance, Basel IV is expected to reduce the complexity of banks’ internal models to narrow the differences between internal modeling and the standardized approach. Such likely changes could have significant implications, particularly for low-risk portfolios such as mortgages or high-quality corporate loans. But part of these, the future prudential framework is now largely in place. Second, governments are policing illegal and unethical behavior much more tightly. This has been driven by a general shift of attention toward financial crime, the disappearing tolerance for tax avoidance, and the supposed increased threat of terrorism from individuals and countries since the September 11, 2001, attacks in the United States.
?Authorities' perception of banks’ prime role in the payment system and their access to customer data, and is making them even more accountable in their roles?in these policy objectives. For instance, banks are asked to help foil financial crimes (e.g., fraud, money laundering, breaching sanctions, terrorist finances) and collect taxes efficiently (e.g., Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, automatic information exchange)?and this trend to continue. Third, governments are increasingly demanding both domestic and global compliance with their regulatory standards. They want “good banks,” within their borders.” Consequently, ?laws and regulations are progressively applied encompassing with extraterritorial effect. Although this has always been the case for a significant share of US regulations (e.g., the US securities laws), its scope has lengthened substantially in the United States and other jurisdictions. It now includes anti-money-laundering regulations, sanctions, and laws concerning bribery, fraud, and tax collection. Other examples include the extraterritorial application of bribery laws in the United Kingdom and several countries in Europe and the extension of the UK sensible senior person regime to managers of UK banks globally. Engagement practices, environmental standards, and financial inclusion appear to be next.
??Finally, the regulation of banks’ behavior toward their customers to tighten significantly, as the public steadily more supposes better customer treatment and more ethical conduct from banks. This is the finale of a long-term trend of the last 150 years, most societies have become more stringent towards the abuse of minorities or less well-threatened populations by majorities or the more powerful.
?Such type of instruction has before now reached businesses. As traditional economic concepts advised that market forces and competition would achieve optimal outcomes for consumers, is a misconception and a fallacy. For instance, general terms and conditions of contracts were regulated once it became clear that consumers had neither the time nor the competence to negotiate detailed terms on their own. Other areas that have been increasingly regulated include marketing, branding, and sales practices. Even though governments and regulators more often proactively trail in a public point of view. Banks’ traditional business applies have already been defied and regulated in multiple areas. Examples include the prohibition of insider trading in the 1990s, the abolition of favored treatment of certain clients in securities offerings, and the calculation of effective interest rates for consumer loans. Many jurisdictions also regulate investment sales practices (e.g., the EU Market in Financial Instruments Directive I and II), mortgages (e.g., the Mortgage Distribution Review in the United Kingdom), and the use of carrots (e.g., the “kickback” payments of a share of the mutual-fund management fee to the distributor). Recent examples include the US Department of Labor’s proposed rule on the fiduciary duties of investment mobility advisers.
We presume that this tendency toward more consumer protection and “conduct” regulation will continue and possibly even accelerate over the next decade. Information asymmetries, barriers to switching, inappropriate or incomprehensible advice, and nontransparent or unnecessarily complex product features or pricing structures are all likely to undergo closer analysis. Pushing and cross-subsidies of products also could become difficult and could result in to “fair pricing” in some marketplaces. Now, banks may even be obliged to inform their customers if they could switch to a product that better suits their needs. Whereas the UK and some Continental European countries appear to be foremost the charge right now, others follow. These slight deviations mostly occur in financial scandals. ?This is caused when long-established bank behaviors clash with changing public or government expectations not yet codified in rules.
?In spite of ?contrary to the general rule that new regulations should affect only future business behavior, the regulatory authorities or courts often apply these retroactively because new rules are issued as specific explanations of ambiguous general principles such as the “fair treatment of customers.” Supervisory omission systems also are evolving. In the near future, banks will probably have to provide supervisors with even more information and support their claims with quantitative data. For example, some regulators no longer accept qualitative statements about how banks are introducing a stronger risk culture but demand regular staff surveys that track progress and benchmark the bank against its peers. Likewise, the data-submission requirements for Comprehensive Capital Analysis Review (CCAR) in the United States have been constantly growing. The supervisory authorities will increasingly enforce banks both to measure how they are doing and to make this information available to them. It almost goes without saying that changes in regulation are unlikely to be uniform across countries. The speed and magnitude of the changes described will vary significantly by country. Still observations on the coming decade, also emerging-market banks will be subject to much more breadth and depth of regulation than prevailing now. These regulatory trends are expected to have substantial implications for banks’ risk management, including the following:
Optimization within a regulatory framework. Capital, liquidity, funding, and leverage ratios, ?as well as recovery and resolution regimes, will likely force banks to construct balance sheets and businesses that comply with all constraints while aiming to fully utilize the capacity under the ratios. This limits banks’ strategic degrees of freedom and demands a new, highly analytical business optimization and strategy-setting process.
?Risk functions could play a key role because of their superior skills in these areas. ? Principles-based compliance. Compliance with existing rules is unlikely to be sufficient; rather, banks will need to comply with broad principles if they are going to protect themselves against potential future rules and interpretations with retroactive effects. For example, they should ask themselves whether practices are “fair” from a customer’s perspective, or whether they would feel comfortable fully disclosing their business practices to customers, supervisory authorities, and the public. If they would not be comfortable, this is a clear warning sign. Banks will probably need to review their entire sales and service approach, examining end-to-end processes along with pricing structures and levels. ? Automated compliance. As the rules become ever more complex and the consequences of noncompliance ever more severe, banks will likely have no choice but to eliminate human interventions as much as possible in risk’s dealings with customers and to hardwire the right behaviors into their products, services, and processes.
?Automated, robust surveillance and monitoring will be significantly vital. . This is the only way to ensure a very low error rate within the first line of defense and to allow proper oversight by the second line.
?COLLABORATION WITH PEER BUSINESSES.
?Regulatory awareness can be realized only if the risk function works closely with businesses. Following the full compliance by the bank from risks requires to be an integrative part of the thinking process at the beginning, before businesses to be set up their strategies or designed a new product.
?CHANGING CUSTOMER EXPECTATIONS
?Just a few years ahead, inclinations in customer hopes and technology are expected to cause massive adjustments in banking and make totally different shapes. The use of extensive technology by customers will become a daily norm for customers. The current tech-savvy younger generation will be the major revenue giver to banks by 2025 because banks make most of their money with customers over 40. Simultaneously, older bank customers are expected to adopt technology at an unexpected level. Technology use by banking customers is already rapidly expanding.?Within no time developing and emerging markets become more tech-savvy. Within the just two years before, the amount of innovation has increased across the sector, and investment in financial-technology (fintech) start-ups has grown rapidly. Innovation affects every part of the value chain, but the most important disruption will probably occur in banks’ origination and sales processes. Fin-tech and technology-firm competitors do not want to become banks; instead, they want to take over the direct customer relationship and gain into the most lucrative parts of the value chain.
?Digital-banking penetration for transactions and services is on the rise across both developed and emerging countries, as Asia illustrates.
??Around 60% of banks’ profits are earned from origination, sales, distribution, and other customer-facing activities which give 22% ?return on equity (ROE). Fin-tech start-ups offer an ever-wider range of highly competitive, seamless offerings. Their new apps and online services are starting to interrupt the great attraction banks have always applied to customers. One of the most important and common strategies they apply just asking customers for transferring a piece of their financial business. Some sites, ?such as BankBazaar.com, aggregate many banks’ offerings in loans, credit cards, deposits, insurance, etc. Some specialize in a single product. Yet others, such as moneysupermarket.com, started with a single product but have extended their services into the full array of financial products and even further (e.g., energy, telecommunications, and travel). These new services make it incredibly simple for customers to open an account; once they have the account, customers can switch among providers with a single click. If banks want to win the fight for their customer relationships, many things will need to happen. Customers will likely expect intuitive experiences, access to services at any time on any device, customized propositions, and instant decisions. To deliver on the customers’ expectations, banks will be forced to revamp and remodel the entire organization from a customer-experience perspective and digitalize at a wide scale. To succeed, the risk function will need to be a core contributor and collaborate with the businesses throughout. It would most likely focus on two priorities, firstly, a majority of profits and more favorable returns come from customer-facing activities like origination and sales. Secondly, ??asset management/investments/ insurance and pensions, ?Transactions/payments, Investment banking, deposits ?Current/checking accounts, ?Lending revenues before risk cost. ??Corporate finance, capital markets, securities services. Fee-based businesses Core banking, Return on equity, total after-tax profits, Credit disintermediation, Customer disintermediation.
?AUTOMATED INSTANT DECISIONS.
?Banks have to provide rapid real-time answers to customer requests (e.g., applications for loans, opening accounts with extremely customized processes, and will be accomplished by risk functions will be possible by the identification of means to help banks assess risks and make decisions without human intervention. This often calls for major, zero-based process redesign and the use of more nontraditional data. Some banks are now designing account-opening processes making the onboarding experience simple, seamless, and fast. In such cases, the risk function’s challenge is to enable a secure yet customer-friendly approach for identification and verification. However, ?customization is a costly proposition for banks because of the complex supporting processes. Besides, regulators are probably likely to constrain banks in an attempt to protect consumers from inappropriate pricing and approval decisions. Risk functions will be expected to work with operations and other functions to find ways to manage these emerging concerns while still providing highly customized solutions.
领英推荐
??TECHNOLOGY AND ANALYTICS AS A RISK POWER
?Technology will not only mend customer behavior but also provide novel risk-management techniques with advanced analytics. The mushrooming of advanced technologies enables cheaper, faster computing power and data storage providing improved risk decision support and process integration.
The possibility of emerging advanced innovations in the next ten years will experience the effects of some significant implications for the risk the management, like, big data, Faster, cheaper computing power enables banks to leverage new information about a granular customer-payment and spending behavior, social-media presence, and online browsing activity including in risk decision making. Reaching external, unstructured data offers profound upward giving insight for better credit-risk decisions, but also for portfolio monitoring and early warning, the detection of financial crime, and prediction of operational losses. Banks have been slowly begun to capitalize on this potential, but still many challenges remain unaddressed. ?A major moot question is whether banks can obtain both regulatory and customer approval for models that use social data, and if so, what usage of data is legal and acceptable. ?
The fast adoption of a new breed of models is offering much deeper insights into data. Machine learning identifies complex, nonlinear patterns in large data sets and makes more accurate risk models possible. These models learn with every bit of new information they acquire, improving their predictive power over time. Many sectors already use machine-learning systems examples comprise weather forecasting, Amazon e-commerce tips, Google’s email spam recognition, Uber suggesting short routes and times, ?and Hot star suggestions.?
The future of bank risk management credit-card-fraud detection, with very hopeful results. Gini factors, measures of a model’s predictive power, often improve substantially. Risk functions to put on machine learning in multiple areas, such as financial-crime detection, credit underwriting, early-warning systems, and collections in the retail and small-and-middle enterprise ?(SME) segments. But, widespread adoption of self-learning models may face regulatory challenges, since such models cannot be validated in the traditional way. Even if regulators do not approve such models for regulatory-capital purposes, till scope exists for other purposes looking at their significant accuracy advantages. ?The Internet gives crowdsourcing of ideas, which many incumbent companies use to improve their effectiveness in certain areas. . Many of these technological innovations can reduce risk costs and fines. Banks that apply these techniques early and boldly can gain a competitive advantage. However, data privacy and protection are expected to be important prerequisites.
??MORE (NONFINANCIAL) RISK TYPES ARE DEVELOPING
?Even after the management of financial risks has advanced meaningly over the last 20 years, but not in the area of especially nonfinancial ones. The incredible increase in fines, damages, and legal costs related to operational and compliance risk over the past five years has forced banks to give also attention to these risks. This will probably increase even further, due to the regulatory trends discussed earlier and given the expected rise in capital requirements for operational risk. Machine learning surfaces insights within large, complex data sets, enabling more accurate risk models. Traditional statistics will fit a predetermined “shape” into a phenomenon (e.g., linear, quadratic, logarithmic)—square peg into round hole Machine-learning algorithms act as thousands of tiny ‘spiders’ that simultaneously run all over data, spotting and recording patterns without clinging to any predetermined course Real-life phenomenon comes in all shapes and flavors, showing patterns that are usually complex, nonlinear, and apparently disorganized.????nd the globalization of finance.4 The more closely connected the markets, the more quickly volatility spreads. Although central banks are the primary entities that worry about contagion risk, individual banks need to understand how they can be exposed to it. Banks have to measure and track it. Reducing this risk can reduce the bank’s total risk and lower its capital requirements because a bank’s exposure to contagion risk is one of the main underlying drivers for its classification as a global systemically important bank.
??Banks’ increasing dependence on models requires that risk managers better understand and manage model risk. Increased data availability and advances in computing, modeling, and algorithms have expanded model use. However, errors from suboptimal models can lead to poor decision-making and increase banks’ risks. Some banks have experienced model-risk-related losses, although most of these cases are not reported publicly. Model errors stem from issues with data quality, conceptual solidity, technical or implementation errors, correlation or time inconsistencies, and uncertainties about volatility. There are multiple mitigation strategies, which center on more rigorous, sophisticated model development, better execution (with higher-quality data), thorough validation, and constant monitoring and improvement of the model.
??Most banks have already made protection against cyberattacks a top strategic priority, as these attacks can have devastating consequences. This is partially due to the banks’ heavy reliance on software, systems, information technology (IT), and data, but also to the fact that these attacks would risk not only the banks’ operations but also confidential customer data.
??CONCLUSION
?In the successive third year of a global pandemic, the financial services industry seems to be adjusting along with a new reality. The initially temporary measures taken are now poised to become permanent, and an improved industry structure is emerging.
?These are the following ?
?The pandemic was the ultimate gut punch, testing banks’ resilience in unforeseen ways. Contrarily, they are becoming stronger with a ?brand-new faith that their ability to face any challenge that comes their way. Before embarking on this journey, banks should take account of the tectonic shifts reconfiguring the global financial system:?phenomenal growth in digitization, the convergence of industries, the fusion of technologies, proliferation of increasingly intertwined ecosystems,?and?the blurring of product constructs.
The new financial architecture created by digital assets will have profound consequences for banks by revolutionizing?how money is created, transferred, stored, and owned. Simultaneously, powerful undercurrents are forcing banking leaders to reckon with the unimaginable challenge of?redefining the workplace and how work is done. To complicate matters, they are grappling with several upheavals in the workforce, a war for talent. Employees, for the first time in decades, appear to have the upper hand, especially in sought-after positions. Meanwhile, even though digital transformation is going ahead at full speed, these efforts tend to be incremental, localized, and fragmented, resulting in a pervasive and malevolent “technology trap.”
There are gender and racial inequities, and gaps in financial inclusion where there is a chance for the industry to keep stepping up to support the communities they operate in. Certainly, there are many other hurdles to overcome. Banks should be bold and aggressive in composing change at the pace and scale that will drive results.
?Though the global financial sector remained immune to major crises in 2021. But in 2022, risks and uncertainty remain heightened. Corporate debt is likely to remain a threat to asset quality, but recent improvements in corporate gearing are encouraging ahead of broader interest-rate increases. Because of increased financial stress across multiple industries including airlines, energy, materials, construction, utilities, and entertainment. If a new shock, epidemiological or other, does occur, policymakers in emerging markets will respond, but measures will be less robust. Consolidation is likely to continue and could accelerate in key economies.
?The future sustainability of banks will be their first priority, that is, detect risk, define it, comprehend it, ?measure it, take prompt decisions to mitigate it, have the conviction to implement it, much before its occurrence. This is the only way of survival.
?
?
?