Embracing the Socratic Method: A Transformative Approach to Teaching Across All Subjects

Embracing the Socratic Method: A Transformative Approach to Teaching Across All Subjects

Konatala Sravan Kumar Konatala Sravan Kumar

Konatala Sravan Kumar

#thegoodghostteacher | On a mission to transform School-Education through Peer-Learning, Gamification, Socratic Questioning & Digitisation | Founder- HOPE Education Technologies, Curiosity unskool & Dise?oCreaa Digital.

发布日期: 2024年8月31日
+ 关注

In this fast-moving educational world, where standardized testing and strict curricula often eclipse many other goals, educators are always on the lookout for that which may bring a little more critical thinking and a little more understanding on the part of the student. The Socratic method happens to be one such anciently philosophically steeped but seemingly timeless method. Within the core of dialogue, inquiry, and reflection, the Socratic method moves beyond this pedagogy to build up a live and engaging learning atmosphere. But what is its actual effect on the classroom, and why should every teacher consider integrating it into his/her own pedagogy? Discussion Based on InquiryCentral idea to the Socratic method is open-ended questioning, intending to challenge students in concepts in deeply. The teacher tries to lead the students into multiple perspectives, argument evidence evaluation, and articulation of reasoning. (This has been followed even nowadays by psychologists when trying to understand the evidence-based findings.)In a math classroom, for example, instead of going through the Pythagorean theorem, the instructor would ask students what could make them believe that the sides of a right triangle have to relate as they do. The question should not elicit a response of 'how' but, rather, 'why,' and thereby deepen understanding.Socratic Dialogue in Other SubjectsThe wonder of the Socratic method is in its adaptability: whether you teach literature, science, mathematics, or social studies, the method can be adapted to both subject and student.Socratic dialogue could be used in literature classes to dissect complex themes and character motivation. An example would be the question, "What are the driving forces that make the character act and how does this reflect the values of the person or of society at the time?" That leads the student inwards through the text, then on to questions of history, and finally out again to make cross-connections to the major themes.In science, one can apply the scientific method to inquiries about the scientific method itself. For example, questions like this: "What assumptions underlie this experiment and how might different variables alter the outcome?" are intended to allow students to think like a scientist, who questions and tests his/her hypothesis. Developing Critical Thinking and ReflectionOne of the most vital strengths of the Socratic method is its potential to develop critical thinking in its learners. In an information-based society such as the present, it has become most important to analyze, evaluate, and synthesize information. Socratic questioning leads students to get in the pattern of receiving information given to them critically, eventually making them become a lot more independent and thoughtful learners.On the other hand, in the Socratic method, there is much reflection. This reflection at the end of a Socratic dialogue encourages students to think about what they learned, how their view has changed, and what questions remain unanswered. It makes learning become more tangible, and one can properly digest material in that way. Applying the Socratic Method: The Socratic STEM Scrum FrameworkIntroducing the Socratic method in your classroom need not mean a complete revamp of your teaching style. You can start off by designing a lesson, for instance, that uses Socratic questioning. Once you become comfortable with this and your students do too, you can take this practice as far as you like.Here is an example of one simple structure that can be used to initiate the process so that inquiry learning is developed in an agile and collaborative environment: 1. Product Backlog: Defining the Learning Objectives for the concept - Learning Goals: These are key STEM concepts or skills that learners should know or be able to do. These usually are "user stories" in a Scrum framework. - Example: In a physics unit, for instance, a learning goal might be "Understand Newton's Laws of Motion."2. Sprint Planning: Getting Ready for Socratic Dialogue - Sprint Goal: Create a tangible goal for the sprint. For example, "Analyze the Applications of Newton's Laws in Real-World Applications." - Generate Questions: Develop open-ended Socratic questions that address the Sprint Goal. For example, "How does Newton's First Law account for the behavior of objects in space?" - Team Roles: Appoint student team roles, including Scrum Master (the facilitator), Product Owner (a person who ensures all activities keep the learning goals in mind), and Development Team (students engaged in inquiry). 3. Sprint Execution: Engaging in Socratic Dialogue - Daily Standups: Begin each class with a brief standup meeting where students discuss their progress, share insights, and identify challenges related to the current Socratic question. - Collaborative Dialogue: Students engage in Socratic dialogue, guided by the teacher. They explore different perspectives, challenge assumptions, and apply critical thinking to solve problems. - Inquiry and Research: The expected experiments, research, and actions that the students undertake are those that support the relevance of proving their claims. 4. Sprint Review: Reflecting on Learning - Presentation of Findings: At the end of the sprint, the teams present their findings and insights from the Socratic dialogues. They explain how they applied the concepts to real-world scenarios and discuss the evidence they gathered. - Peer Review: Teams provide each other with feedback on their presentations, focusing on the quality of the inquiry, depth of understanding, and the use of critical thinking. 5. Sprint Retrospective: Reflection on the Continuous Improvement Process - Reflection: As students and teacher reflect on the sprint, they discuss what went well and what needed improvement. That includes evaluating the effectiveness of Socratic questions and team collaboration. - Plan for the Next Sprint: Using the retrospective, change the strategy for the next sprint. This can be developing the questions, changing the ideas/approach of the team or introducing a new research method.6. Use of the Socratic Method in STEM Scrum Cycles - Iteration and Adaptation: The Socratic method is employed in each of the sprint cycles so that there can be continuous inquiry as well as reflection. Over time, students develop more better questioning of assumptions, more skillful analysis of data, and better synthesis of information. - Working Across STEM Disciplines: The strategy can be applied in various STEM domains, such as to examine ethical implications in genetic engineering (life sciences) or to decompose complex algorithms (computing). 7. Finished Product Delivery: Demonstrating Mastery - Project: At the end of a series of sprints, students complete a project to demonstrate their mastery of the STEM concepts explored. The project is presented to peers and focuses on how Socratic inquiry brought a deeper understanding of the subject matter.


This method has been widely in use at HOPE EDUCATION TECHNOLOGIES (Higher Opportunities for Progressive Education) and at Curiosity UnSkool- STEM Exploration Club founded by us Konatala Sravan Kumar Jagadeesh Kumar Bolli Mahalakshmi Kutcharlapati Karuna Reshma Vijinigiri Dr. Mukesh Parankusam Aguru Madhuri

Shanthi Kasturi

Counselling Psychologist | APA Graduate Student member | Currently working at Parindey foundation and Unwind. "DM" to book for a therapy session

6 个月

Such a profound and insightful blog????

赞
回复

要查看或添加评论，请登录

Konatala Sravan Kumar的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了