Embracing National Identity in the Centralisation of Australian Rugby

Contrary to popular belief, Australian rugby is alive. At the same time, the threads of State pride, culture and traditions are entrenched in the system. Some may say it is to the detriment of success. While traditions and cultural separation are admired, this is a call for national identity to align with a common purpose. I have often stated, ‘Australian rugby is too small a sport to be fractured in the Australian sporting landscape.’?

I am reminded of my time at Irish Rugby, where change occurred not by obliterating provincial ideals but by aligning them with a national identity. It was a balance of replacing parochial sentiments with overarching national ideals while preserving each province’s unique traditions, culture, and rugby philosophy. This experience was not just about shaping a team; it was about embedding a unifying program to inspire the game’s stakeholders – players, parents, supporters and coaches at all game levels. Pride is a powerful weapon when loaded.?

Considering where we stand in the Australian game, we must reinvent, inspire and align the rugby community while learning from past lessons. I continually hear of ‘Review’ and ‘Centralisation,’ which by design should enable a strategic shift to find national unification. It’s about aligning expectations through listening, collaborating, and merging ideals and philosophies under the standard banner of Australian rugby excellence. Is Rugby Australia up for the challenge while recognising the necessary long-term strategic rebuild??

Preserving Tradition?

In my recent book, “Principles of High-Performing Teams,” Chapters 9 and 10 discuss the remodelling of national rugby programs in Scotland and Ireland. The message is clear, and I set to find means to align provincial traditions with national objectives. What we achieved, for example, in Ireland through this period, we recognised the value of unity as an enabler for Provincial and National success. The cornerstone of the national and provincial programs was finding the balance between the desire for success and the ideals that drive success.

Fostering High Performance:

The centralisation process must recognise the interplay between professional, pathway, and community elements. It’s not just about building a powerful national team; it’s about cultivating a rugby ecosystem where each level appreciates their part as crucial to each other’s success. We must recognise the national team’s success is a by-product of a strong and vibrant participation, community engagement and pathway program.

Strategic Alignment:

The upcoming discussion on centralisation is not just an administrative overhaul; it’s a process of aligning every aspect of the structure and infrastructure. Every element is intertwined, from commercial strategies to operational efficiency and on-field performance. For instance, the roadmap must accept the need for change supported by the generational development of coaches and players as a systematic approach to realising a shared vision of success.

Building Momentum:

Winning and success cannot be abstract goals. They are the fundamental building blocks upon which stakeholder and investor support hinge. Success at the national and Super Rugby level is not just a trophy in a cabinet; it inspires local clubs and community competitions, fostering grassroots passion that sustains our game.

Preliminary Considerations

With or without a centralised model, the following points are the business expectations of any organisation, particularly a national body. It would be exciting to measure our current efficiency considering the game’s current state and how well these business aspects measure up at our Super Rugby and Member Unions. Are these questions asked of our Member unions?

A centralised model offers a rational and strategic approach. By unifying efforts, standardising practices, and fostering community engagement, this model promises to breathe new life into Australian rugby. It’s time for the nation to embrace a systematic approach and set the course for a successful future for the game.

1. Stakeholder Engagement and Alignment: State Member Unions Engage in open dialogues with state unions, addressing concerns and highlighting the benefits of centralisation, emphasising collaborative decision-making and mutual benefits.

2.????? Super Rugby Bodies: Collaborate with franchises, involving them in the centralisation process, ensuring representative interests, and demonstrating how a unified approach enhances their competitiveness and financial stability.

1. Transparent Communication: Communicate the centralised model’s vision, objectives, and expected outcomes clearly to all stakeholders. Transparency builds trust and ensures everyone is on the same page regarding the structural reforms and benefits.
2. Financial Analysis and Planning: Conduct a comprehensive financial analysis, evaluating the current financial status of State member unions and Super Rugby franchises. Identify potential challenges and devise financial models that ensure fair revenue distribution, covering operational costs and development program investments.
3. Strategic Development Roadmap: Develop a detailed roadmap outlining the steps of centralisation, including integrating player pathways, coaching standards, and commercial activities. Provide specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound goals to measure progress and success.
4. Governance and Decision-Making Framework: Establish a clear governance structure defining the centralised model’s roles, responsibilities, and decision-making processes. Create committees or working groups representing stakeholders to ensure inclusivity and collaborative decision-making.
5. Legal and Regulatory Compliance: Ensure the centralised model complies with legal and regulatory requirements. Work with legal experts to navigate contract obligations, intellectual property rights, and other legal aspects of the transition.
6. Change Management and Training: Implement a change management strategy to help stakeholders adapt to the new structure. Provide training programs for administrators, coaches, and support staff for role clarity in the centralised system.
7. Performance Metrics and Evaluation: Define key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure the success of the centralised model. Regularly evaluate these metrics to assess the impact on national and Super Rugby performances, financial growth, and overall quality of the rugby product.
8. Collaborative Marketing and Promotion: Develop joint marketing and promotional campaigns involving state unions, Super Rugby franchises, and Rugby Australia. Present a unified image to sponsors, broadcasters, and fans, highlighting the collective strength of Australian rugby.
9. Continuous Feedback Loop: Establish mechanisms for continuous feedback from stakeholders. Regular forums, surveys, and feedback sessions can provide valuable insights, enabling the centralised model to adapt and evolve based on the needs and suggestions of the rugby community.

Systematic Rationalisation

Australian rugby faces multifaceted challenges, including a disappointing international ranking, underwhelming Super Rugby team performances, coach and player talent retention issues, a lack of investment and a declining game footprint. In light of these challenges, a systematic rationalisation for transitioning to a centralised model emerges as a potential solution, offering a strategic pathway toward revitalising Australian rugby.

1. Addressing Poor International Rankings:

• Rationale: A centralised model provides a unified approach to talent identification, player development, and coaching standards. Standardised training methodologies and a clear player pathway can elevate the skillset of Australian players, enhancing their competitiveness on the international stage.

2. Improving Super Rugby Team Performances and Talent Retention:

• Rationale: By centralising high-performance pathways and integrating player development efforts, Australian rugby can create a talent pool that is both deep and sustainable. A unified system ensures that promising players are supported to stay within the domestic rugby framework, bolstering both Super Rugby and national team strength.

3. Retaining Coach Intellectual Property:

• Rationale: Centralisation allows for standardised coaching protocols and mentorship programs, enabling coaches to collaborate and share knowledge. This collective approach encourages a culture of continuous learning and mentorship, reducing the temptation for coaches to seek opportunities overseas and supporting the retention of valuable intellectual property within Australia.

4. Attracting Investors and Enhancing the Product Quality:

• Rationale: A centralised model presents potential investors with a cohesive and attractive product. Standardised performance levels, exciting gameplay, and a unified marketing approach make Australian rugby a more appealing investment prospect. Investor confidence is needed to secure financial stability and a compelling on-field product.

5. Addressing Expansion Challenges:

• Rationale: Centralisation offers a streamlined approach to expand rugby’s footprint. A centralised model can penetrate untapped regions by focusing on grassroots initiatives and community engagement programs. Ensuring inclusivity and support at the grassroots level fosters a sense of ownership and pride, encouraging the organic growth of rugby nationwide.

?Conclusion

Australian rugby has the opportunity to promote change across the system, and not just at the ‘pointy end.’ As the push for centralisation emerges as a unifying force, we must consider the many factors influencing change. For example, State pride, cultural nuances, and traditions need not hinder progress but should enrich the game’s product and sustainability. The catalyst that should not be understated as a primary enabler is our stakeholder passion.

As an example, my experiences in Irish Rugby underscore a crucial point: embracing change doesn’t erase tradition; it revitalises it. Preserving each province’s legacy while aligning with national ideals is not a compromise but a natural evolution. This delicate balance is vital to a thriving national program. It must be considered as crucial for a revitalised Australian rugby community.

Looking ahead, amidst discussions of centralisation, challenges and promises. It calls for reinvention, inspiration, and a commitment to align diverse elements. As I mentioned, centralisation isn’t just an administrative shift; it’s a journey demanding dialogue, collaboration, and a profound understanding of the necessary rebuild. What is the appetite for change, and to what extent, regardless of strategic intent?

My discussion isn’t new, and many aspects reflect my work in previous national appointments. This work is referenced as lessons from Chapters 9 and 10 of my recent book, “Principles of High-Performance Teams,” with emphasis on celebrating diversity rather than erasing it. A decade of efforts in Scotland and Ireland revealed the impact of aligning provincial traditions with national goals. Preserving tradition while embracing change is fundamental to a thriving national program.

Centralisation involves a professional system, aligned pathways, and communities working together. Success extends beyond national success to community involvement and player development pathways. Collaboration nurtures a rugby ecosystem where every aspect thrives together.

Centralisation is a seamless integration of various components. Whether centralisation is the model to take Australian rugby forward remains to be seen. From commercial strategies to on-field performance, each aspect must align cohesively.

Embracing change and viewing international performances as guiding stars are vital to collective success. Winning and success are tangible outcomes, not abstract dreams. They inspire local clubs and communities, fuelling passion for the sport. Transitioning to a centralised model requires contextualised planning, transparency, and continuous feedback.

?