Elon Musk Twitter Takeover--1st Amendment; Choose Your Battles Wisely
Musk Twitter takeover exposes fascist board of directors

Elon Musk Twitter Takeover--1st Amendment; Choose Your Battles Wisely

With the shenanigans of 2020 further and further in the rear view mirror, the Evil Army of Darkness has been on the ascent. Successfully pivoting from the terror the the Covid-19 pandemic to a war in Ukraine, POTUS Dementia Joe is in position to take the blame for everything, and be thrown under the bus by his own people. We have a border crisis. We have bad inflation.? You can’t even complain on social media, without being censored. The 10th Amendment is gone, in practice. The 4th amendment is in tatters. The 2nd amendment is relentlessly chipped away at. The 1st amendment, well, the part about being censored on social media for political observations, pretty much covers that. Comedians are afraid to make jokes, they will get slapped--both figuratively and literally!


Enter Elon Musk.


Musk, the famous billionaire founder of PayPal, NeuraLink, SpaceX, and Tesla, among other achievements, comes along and buys Twitter, announcing that he will end the censorship on that social media platform, and restore it to its role as America’s Open Town Hall. Then comes the hysteria from Neomarxists. They threaten to leave Twitter--not because they will be censored, but because their political opponents will no longer be censored! Incredible!?


So this is an important story of an important battle, for freedom and the 1st Amendment. What’s fascinating is the ease with which Musk completed his buyout. Because as soon as Musk’s intentions were known, all the forces of evil in the Army of Darkness started scrambling to stop him, to keep the censorship on Twitter. The Twitter Board of Directors huffed, and puffed, and threatened Musk with a “poison pill!”?


What I wanted to know was “who are the people on the Twitter Board of Directors? Why would they be in favor of censorship anyway? And why were they ultimately so inept in preventing Musk from his hostile takeover? I just looked at the Twitter web-site page for their Board. This is what I observed.


The Twitter Board is made up of 11 people; Independent Board Chair Bret Taylor, Parag Agrawal, Mimi Alemayehou, Jack Dorsey, Egon Durban, Martha Lane Fox, Omid Kordestani, Dr. Fei-Fei Li, Patrick Pichette, and Robert Zoellick.?


First, Jack Dorsey. He was a co-founder of Twitter and the only one to publicly support Musk. Dorsey once famously had his own Twitter account suspended, with millions of followers, in what was described as an “internal mistake.” After much drama about how Twitter could influence elections, including Dorsey testifying before the US Senate and also meeting privately with then President Trump, Dorsey was deep in the power struggle and efforts by Facebook and Google and other social media/technology platforms to oust Trump. Shortly after being subpoenaed by the US Senate Commerce Committee under Republican Senator Roger Wicker, Dorsey announced his resignation as CEO of Twitter in November 2021, and since then he appears in public bearded and in hippie tie-died t-shirts.? Clearly Dorsey was not totally comfortable with the censorship and election meddling role that his company was basically being forced to play, so he retired, and now just vaguely supports free speech and Musk, and defends his actions as CEO with limited effectiveness.?


Brett Taylor. Similar to how Wall Street, the Federal Reserve, the US Treasury department, all see the same people rotate in and out of positions of leadership from one organization to the other, Taylor did that in silicon valley; starting out at Stanford University, and taking advantage of the special relationship between the US University system and business, he began with Google and a Wall Street/venture capital firm called Benchmark Capital,? got promoted to Chief Technology Officer at Facebook, and then became CEO of Salesforce, and then CEO of Twitter. Taylor does not speak a lot or otherwise comment publicly about politics. Being a creature of California, and Silicon Valley, the assumption is that he identifies as “progressive” and the fact that he led the resistance to Musk’s buyout, which was a plan to implement a so-called “poison pill” which is a Wall Street term for a move a company board of directors takes to make it hard if not financially impossible for someone to buy their company, shows that. In this case, the poison pill was a lame provision that would allow for other shareholders to buy shares “at a discount” if any one person were to buy 15% or more of the company stock.


This poison pill was lame, because the stock of Twitter was spread out among many, many individual or institutional holders. Musk started out in stealth mode, and by the time people found out that he had purchased almost 10% of the shares of Twitter, he was the largest shareholder. There were no other large shareholders to band together against him. And the owners might not have any $ to buy more shares, even at a discount--all the members of the Board were basically appointed for politics and networking, not because they were large owners themselves, or represented large blocks of ownership.?


So when Musk quickly showed up with over 44 billion in cash--the money talked, and the bullshit poison pill, walked!


Parag Agrawal, Co-CEO. Agrawal is also from Stanford; he’s originally from India, strictly a computer guy, an expert in Artificial Intelligence, and he started out with Microsoft and Yahoo. Without question his interest is using AI to monitor and control people, via social re-engineering, via social media. Parag spoke for himself in an interview with MIT Technology Review in 2020, when he stated for the record “Our role is not to be bound by the First Amendment, but our role is to serve a healthy public conversation,...focus less on free speech, but thinking about how the times have changed.”?


Mimi Alemayehou. Alemayehou, a naturalized US citizen from Ethiopia/Kenya, strictly represents Wall Street, as the Senior VP for Public/Private Partnerships at MasterCard. It makes sense. Twitter is a huge platform for online commerce, MasterCard sales and uses. Alemayehou has a deep political/global banking background, starting out being appointed by George W Bush? an Executive Director on the Board of Directors for the? African Development Bank, and later she was appointed by Obama as Executive VP of Overseas Private Investment Corporation, African Development Foundation! Eventually, before joining MasterCard, she made her way to Blackstone in their Black Rhino Group, whatever the hell that is! Again, like the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, the Black Rhino Group is not meant to be known and understood by the public. This is the fascist deep state at work!?


Egon Durban. Another Wall Street creature, Durban sits on many Boards of Directors for various companies, coordinating for the banks. Durban started out as an investment banker with Morgan Stanley, and is currently co-CEO of Silverlake Partners, a private investment firm that started out with 15 billion dollars to invest in 2017.??


Martha Lane Fox. Martha, Martha, Martha! The Queen of England and her royal Windsor family like to have their fingers in many pies; Fox connects the royal family to Twitter. Fox is a British citizen who served as a “Crossbench Peer” in the United Kingdom House of Lords, and is a Trustee of The Queen of England’s Commonwealth Trust. As a minion of the Royal Windsor Family, it goes without saying she hates that the USA was able to break away from England and gain independence, and wants to do everything in her power to undermine our constitutional republic, for the benefit or her European Aristocrat masters.?


Omid Kordestani. Originally from Iran, and another product of Stanford, Kordestani paid his dues, with experience going all the way back to Hewlett Packard and? Netscape, before being recruited by Google.? He’s an MBA and a sales and nuts and bolts guy; he was in charge of sales and business development for Google for a while.?


Dr. Fei-Fei- Li. Originally from China. Co director of Stanford’s Computer Science Human-Centered AI Institute. Former VP and Chief Scientist of AI at Google Cloud. Li is another proponent of AI robots enslaved and ordered to monitor and censor humans, for a human political agenda. In discussing the role of AI for social re-engineering purposes, Li said “It starts with early education, and extends to the existing structures of power within academia…and gatekeeping functions of research, to name a few levers of change." Interestingly, it seems Li has a similar strategy as that of the Jesuits, who infamously proclaimed “give us a child ‘till age 7, and we will have them for life.”


Patrick Pichette. A Canadian, and creature, like Bill Clinton, of Oxford and the deep state recruiting machine known as the “Rhodes Scholarship.” Another banker and former Google executive. He was the head of the Canadian “Trudeau Foundation.” Yes, there is a pattern emerging.?


David Rosenblatt. An expert in business technology and online advertising, Rosenblatt started out with Doubleclick, before moving up to, wait for it, Google. He has an MBA from Stanford.?


Robert Zoellick. Senior Fellow of International Affairs at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government. International Banker and CEO of 1stDibs, which is apparently, an online marketplace for high priced, luxury goods, such as collectible art. Was a Managing Director at Goldman Sachs. Was President of The World Bank Group. Held various political appointments, such as Counselor to the US Secretary of the Treasury, Under Secretary of State, Deputy Chief of Staff for George H Bush. Foreign Policy Advisor to George W Bush. Zoellick is the epitome of the political lawyer. He played a key role in the legal battle over the Presidential Election recount in Florida in 2000. Zoellick holds a fervent, almost religious view about the role of banking in society. While President of The World Bank Group, he said “while the World Bank Group has some of the attributes of a financial and development business, it’s calling is much broader. It is a unique and special institution of knowledge and learning. It collects and supplies valuable data. Yet this is not a university--rather it is a “brain trust” of applied experience that will help us address the…other strategic themes.” It’s safe to say Zoellick holds personal and global economic views similar to his peer Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum. ‘Nough said.?


There you have it. Insight into the corporate fascist system of business control for political agenda and social re-engineering. The Board of Directors for Twitter? It’s a nexus of the University system, business/banking, artificial intelligence, and politics.? And it all aligned to try and keep Elon Musk from buying the company, and possibly putting and end to the blatant, political censorship and election influencing that was currently in place.


Choose your battles wisely. The framers of the Constitution understood that.? Continental Militia Captain John Parker understood that, April 19th 1775, at Lexington, when he told his men “Stand your ground! Don’t fire, unless fired upon; but if they mean to have a war,. Let it begin here!”?


Fuck you, Parag Agrawal, you freak, and fuck your idea that you are not bound by the 1st Amendment! You are! Wake up, you are not in India anymore! Here in the US, you are bound by our law of the land, the constitution! Fuck all of you foreigners who come to our country to cash in, and then try to subvert the system of constitutional law by which you benefited so much! Fuck you wall street bankers and lawyers and crooked politicians and AI experts who support social media censorship and election interfering!


There’s a new (old) Sheriff in town! It’s not Elon Musk!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Phillip Bartling的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了