The Elephant and Risk Analysis

There’s a fable that is said to have originated from the Indian subcontinent about some blind men and an elephant. There are many versions of the story, but the gist is pretty much the same: some blind men (who had been blind from birth) had heard that something called an ‘elephant’ was brought into town. Curious to know what an ‘elephant’ was, they all reached out to touch it. One man reached out and happened to touch the trunk, and concluded that an elephant was some sort of snake. Another reached out and happened to touch one of the elephant’s legs, and concluded that it was some sort of tree. And finally, the last one reached out and happened to grasp the elephant’s tail, and concluded that an elephant was some kind of whip. A big argument ensued as to what an elephant actually was, with each of the men being partly right about its characteristics but also simultaneously completely wrong about its true nature.

 Risk analysis has flourished into a rich and diverse field, with analytical approaches increasingly growing in sophistication. As a community, we certainly have much to celebrate in terms of pushing the boundaries of the analysis and management of different types of risk. The strength of the field, however, is the hallmark of its weakness: while we have explored the vast diversity of risk, we have also contributed to its fragmentation.

 Have we become the blind men who have been independently trying to understand what an elephant is? Have we developed strong convictions about what we know about particular risks, but failed to see the big picture? As we continue to deepen our understanding of different risks, are we depriving ourselves of the opportunity to truly grasp its nature?

 In order to push the boundaries of risk analysis, we need to bring our different perspectives and areas of expertise together. This is the only way for us to gain important insights into the complex nature of risk, and to appreciate how our work builds on and enriches each other’s approaches.

We need to break down our disciplinary silos.

We need to talk about the elephant in the room.

Joanne MacDonald

Head of Compliance Shaype Group

6 年

Excellent analogy Sandra and all too true!

Kerry McGoldrick

Recognised leader in governance, risk and resilience

6 年

Good point of view Sandra, thanks for sharing it.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Sandra Seno-Alday的更多文章

  • 2023 Risk in Review

    2023 Risk in Review

    It’s beginning to look a lot like the end of the year. So I decided to do a 2023 year in risk review.

    3 条评论
  • Refracting risk

    Refracting risk

    From the complex systems perspective, risk is multifaceted, multidimensional and interconnected. While the rapid growth…

    1 条评论
  • Risk in an interconnected world

    Risk in an interconnected world

    This is the theme of this year’s exciting conference of the Society for Risk Analysis Australia and New Zealand (SRA…

  • Towards a collective intelligence

    Towards a collective intelligence

    We live in interesting times. It has been almost 100 years since Frank Knight published his 1921 seminal work on Risk…

    4 条评论
  • Australia's connectedness in the Asia Pacific region

    Australia's connectedness in the Asia Pacific region

    9 条评论
  • ASEAN Summit

    ASEAN Summit

    @SenoAlday: greater trade & economic integration in #ASEAN has made the region more resilient to financial shocks…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了