Elasticsearch vs MongoDB
Manoj Kumar
Principal Consultant | BFSI |AWS Certified Solutions Architect|Core Java | J2EE | Spring Boot| Microservice | Elasticsearch | Redis | Kafka | OAuth2 | DevOps | AWS Cloud | Kubernetes | Certified ACTICO | Security Audit
MongoDB is already quite popular, and many popular companies are using it and endorsing it. On the other hand, Elasticsearch is an emerging player in the database. MongoDB is extremely user-friendly, and all the different background applications of a database can be performed in simple steps. Elasticsearch is not just a database but a search engine. But it is versatile and has a document store database model like MongoDB. Before choosing any of them, you need to know the main differences between these two database choices.
Elasticsearch and MongoDB are both popular database technologies used for different purposes.
Elasticsearch is a search engine that is built on top of the Apache Lucene library. It is designed to handle large amounts of unstructured data, such as log files, text documents, and social media data, and provides fast search and analytics capabilities. Elasticsearch is a distributed, highly available system that can be scaled horizontally by adding more nodes to the cluster.
MongoDB, on the other hand, is a document-oriented database that is designed to handle semi-structured and unstructured data. It is a NoSQL database that stores data in a flexible document format, similar to JSON and is used for applications that require high scalability and availability. MongoDB is also a distributed database that can be scaled horizontally by adding more nodes to the cluster.
Here are some specific differences between Elasticsearch and MongoDB in terms of their built-in features:
While both Elasticsearch and MongoDB can be used for storing and querying large amounts of data, they differ in their primary use cases. Elasticsearch is better suited for full-text search and analytics use cases, while MongoDB is better suited for applications that require flexible data modelling and real-time data access.
Elasticsearch is optimized for full-text search and analytics, while MongoDB is optimized for flexible data modelling and real-time data access. Both databases are highly scalable and have strong communities, but Elasticsearch has a larger ecosystem with more third-party tools and integrations available
Senior SAP developer at Booking.com
1 年Hi. Thanks for your review- being principal Java dev would you recommend to use Mongo as a document store for this stack? What are alternative databases (dbSaaS preferably which are good to store documents and enable in memory ad-hoc calculations )? I am also considering the choice between RBDMS with JSON capabilities + ElasticSearch and Mongo Atlas. Just curious what are other alternatives to your opinion? Thanks
--
1 年Stay ahead of the competition by joining our cutting-edge Elastic training program. Gain the expertise to deliver scalable and efficient solutions. Post link:https://www.dhirubhai.net/posts/springpeople-training_springpeople-business-power-activity-7092693058974056448-cXpx?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop Visit - https://lnkd.in/gRq5xTcd #springpeople #business #power #training #jobalert #elastic #elasticsearch #jobfair #elasticsearchengineer #talentmanagement #hrconsulting #jobhunters
Software Engineer at Unico Connect
1 年Helpful. Informative
SDE-3 @Oracle l Ex-Flipkart | Distributed Systems | Java | Spring Boot | Hibernate | Kafka | Docker | Kubernetes
1 年Helpful ??
Senior Software Engineer at Newgen Software Noida || Ex- Motherson || Trade & Finance
1 年Great sharing sir ??