EKS VS AKS VS GKE

When choosing a managed Kubernetes service, businesses typically compare Amazon EKS (Elastic Kubernetes Service), Azure AKS (Azure Kubernetes Service), and Google GKE (Google Kubernetes Engine). Here’s an overview of each, including their special features, business use cases, and cost considerations.

1. Amazon EKS

Special Features:

• Integration with AWS services: Deep integration with AWS services such as IAM for security, ELB for load balancing, and CloudWatch for monitoring.
• Fargate Integration: Ability to run serverless containers, which simplifies operations by removing the need to manage servers or clusters of Amazon EC2 instances.
• Managed Node Groups: Automates the provisioning and lifecycle management of nodes (EC2 instances).

Business Use Case:

• Ideal for businesses already invested in the AWS ecosystem that require tight integration with other AWS services.
• Suitable for applications that demand robust security and fine-grained access control, leveraging AWS IAM.

Cost:

• You pay $0.10 per hour for each Amazon EKS cluster that you create.
• Costs for EC2 instances or Fargate usage for running pods are additional based on resources consumed.

2. Azure AKS

Special Features:

• Azure Active Directory integration: Offers seamless integration with Azure’s identity services for managing user access.
• Azure Monitor for containers: Provides monitoring and diagnostics for AKS including performance metrics and logs.
• Auto-scaling: Includes cluster autoscaler to automatically adjust the number of nodes in your cluster.

Business Use Case:

• Best for businesses that are heavily invested in Microsoft’s cloud and on-premises technologies, especially for hybrid cloud environments.
• Suitable for enterprises looking for integrated enterprise-level security features.

Cost:

• No charge for the AKS management service.
• You pay only for the virtual machines and associated storage and networking resources consumed by the Kubernetes cluster.

3. Google GKE

Special Features:

• Data analytics integration: Native integration with Google’s data analytics tools like BigQuery.
• Multi-cluster management: GKE Hub allows managing multiple clusters across clouds and on-premises from a single pane of glass.
• Autopilot mode: A hands-off cluster management mode where Google manages the nodes and infrastructure.

Business Use Case:

• Ideal for businesses that need strong integration with data analytics and machine learning tools provided by Google Cloud.
• Best for applications that require high scalability and automation.

Cost:

• GKE standard clusters have a management fee of $0.10 per cluster hour, similar to EKS.
• Autopilot mode incurs costs based on the resources used by the running workloads instead of the underlying infrastructure.

Cost Comparison:

• EKS and GKE both charge a management fee per cluster, whereas AKS does not charge for the management component but only for the resources used.
• The cost-effectiveness of each service depends significantly on the specific use case, resources used, and integration requirements.

In conclusion, the choice between EKS, AKS, and GKE should be driven by your existing cloud environment, specific feature requirements, and how well each integrates with the tools and services you already use. Cost considerations should also include not only direct charges but also operational overhead and potential savings from features like autoscaling and serverless options.

Free Newsletter Devops Best practise:https://www.dhirubhai.net/newsletters/devops-real-world-practise-7183495093687918592/

Free Newsletter on AWS and Azure Cloud :https://www.dhirubhai.net/newsletters/cloud-mastery-tips-7189298617940074496/

Best Selling Course on AWS S3 Mastery course Udemy

https://www.udemy.com/course/aws-s3-mastery-beginner-to-expert/

Offical page: www.dhirubhai.net/company/awstrainingwithjagan

Website : https://awstrainingwithjagan.com/