Effect of Pressure On Separator Ionic Conductivity
IEST Instruments

Effect of Pressure On Separator Ionic Conductivity

1. Background

The intercalation/deintercalation or deposition/stripping of lithium ions, along with side reactions such as continuous growth of the SEI film and gas generation, can induce internal pressure in batteries. This pressure influences various battery performance characteristics through interfacial effects[1]. Due to the porous structure and material properties of separators, significant deformation occurs under pressure, leading to pressure-dependent changes in separator ionic conductivity. Studies have shown that the deformation-pressure relationship curve of porous separators during compression can be divided into three stages: elastic (Ⅰ), plastic (Ⅱ), and densification (Ⅲ) stages, as illustrated in Figure 1.

In Stage Ⅰ, the porous separator undergoes substantial elastic deformation under pressure but rapidly restores its original morphology upon pressure release, maintaining unchanged ion transport properties. During Stage Ⅱ, the separator experiences plastic compression, where the pore structure becomes irreversibly deformed. Ion transport capability cannot be fully preserved, and the separator fails to fully recover its initial state after pressure removal. In Stage Ⅲ, the porous structure collapses and densifies, with pores completely closing to form a compact structure. At this stage, the separator loses its ion transport functionality[2-3].

Figure 1. Fatigue-strain relationship diagram of discomfort during compression[2]
Figure 1. Fatigue-strain relationship diagram of discomfort during compression[2]

Data show that the membrane deformation is 0.5 at 0-20 MPa, and increases from 0.5 to 0.55 at 20-30 MPa. At 0-12 MPa, the ionic conductivity of the membrane decreases with the increase of stress, and the two are linearly related. When the stress is higher than 12 MPa, the separator ionic conductivity decreases rapidly and gradually tends to be stable [4]. The different separator ionic conductivity decays differently with the increase of pressure. This paper tests the changes in the two separator ionic conductivity at 0-3 MPa to explore the effect of pressure on the separator ionic conductivity.

2. Test conditions & methods

2.1 Test Instrument

The Multi-channel Separator Ionic Conductivity Test System (EIC2400M) developed by IEST is used as shown in Figure 2. The equipment contains 4 test channels and can provide a high-purity argon atmosphere to achieve electrochemical impedance spectroscopy testing of multi-channel symmetrical batteries. The pressure range is 10~50Kg and the frequency range is 100KHz~0.01Hz.

Figure 2. IEST Electrode Tortuosity Tester & Separator Ion Conductivity Tester(EIC Series)
Figure 2. IEST Electrode Tortuosity Tester & Separator Ion Conductivity Tester(

1.2 Test Samples

Separator A and Separator B.

1.3 Test Procedure & Calculation Method for Separator Ionic Conductivity

  • Place the sample separators in the corresponding four channels with 1 layer, 2 layers, 3 layers, and 4 layers, respectively.
  • Close the equipment chamber door, evacuate the chamber, and fill it with high-purity argon to remove moisture.
  • Inject a amount of electrolyte into each channel.
  • After reaching the required soaking time, automatically perform EIS (Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy) testing.
  • Finally, use software to fit and calculate the ionic conductivity of the separators.

Figure 3. EIS impedance spectra of different diaphragm layers (a); R value fitting diagram (b)

The diaphragm ionic conductivity is obtained by substituting the obtained ionic impedance R into Equation 1.

σ=d /( R * S)? (1)

Among them, σ is the ionic conductivity, d is the thickness of separator , R is the ionic resistance, and S is the reaction area of the separator.

2. Results Analysis

Figure 4. EIS spectra of diaphragms under different pressures: diaphragm A (a)
Figure 4. EIS spectra of diaphragms under different pressures: diaphragm A (a)
Figure 5. EIS spectra of diaphragms under different pressures: diaphragm B (b)
Figure 5. EIS spectra of diaphragms under different pressures: diaphragm B (b)

Figure 4 and 5 shows the EIS spectra of separators A and B measured under different pressures. Using the obtained EIS as the baseline for linear fitting, the intersection values of the fitted line and the X-axis are recorded to obtain the impedance values R1, R2, R3, and R4 for 1 to 4 layers of the separator. Then, with the number of layers on the X-axis and R1, R2, R3, and R4 on the Y-axis, linear fitting is performed to obtain the ionic impedance R of the separators under different pressures, as shown in Tables 1 and 2. Substituting the R values into formula (1), the ionic conductivity of the separators under corresponding pressures is calculated, as illustrated in Figure 5. From the figure, it can be observed that as the pressure increases, the ionic conductivity of the separators decreases linearly, and the rate of decrease for separator B is significantly greater than that for separator A.

Table 1. Ionic resistance and ionic conductivity of separator A at different pressures
Table 1. Ionic resistance and ionic conductivity of separator A at different pressures
Table 2. Ionic resistance and ionic conductivity of separator B at different pressures
Table 2. Ionic resistance and ionic conductivity of separator B at different pressures
Figure 5. Relationship between separator ion conductivity and pressure
Figure 5. Relationship between separator ion conductivity and pressure

The porosity of the separator is a critical factor determining mass transport, as it ensures sufficient Li+ ion conductivity. The data from this experiment demonstrate that mechanical pressure alters the microstructure of the separator, hindering ion migration and thereby reducing the Li+ conductivity of the separator.

4. Summary

This study utilized the multi-channel separator ionic conductivity testing system independently developed by IEST to measure the different separator ionic conductivity under various pressures. It was found that the separator ionic conductivity decreases with increasing pressure, and different separators exhibit varying rates of decline. When a separator is subjected to pressure in the thickness direction, its microporous structure inevitably changes, further affecting lithium ion transport and the overall performance of the battery. This highlights the importance of comprehensively understanding the relationship between the microporous structure of the separator and pressure for producing separators better suited to the internal environment of lithium-ion batteries. We can improve battery performance by testing the separator ionic conductivity and selecting the appropriate pressure.

5. References

[1] Cui Jin, Shi Chuan, Zhao Jinbao. Research progress on the effect of mechanical pressure on the performance of lithium batteries[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry, 2021, 72(7): 3511-3523.

[2] Gioia G, Wang Y, Cuiti?o A M. The energetics of heterogeneous deformation in open-cell solid foams[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2001, 457(2009): 1079-1096.

[3] Sarkar A, Shrotriya P, Chandra A. Modeling of separator failure in lithium-ion pouch cells under compression[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2019, 435: 226756.

[4] Peabody C, Arnold C B. The role of mechanically induced separator creep in lithium-ion battery capacity fade[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2011, 196(19): 8147-8153.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

IEST Instruments的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了