Editor's letter: your weekly digest
Does a secondary Growth Duty requirement clash with a regulator's day job? Is the global approach to AI governance really a 'big, fragmented mess'? And what does the US election result teach us about good risk management? That, and more, is covered in BRR's week that was below.
But still no guarantees after landmark ruling. Opinion: Paul Brehony & Simon Fawell, Signature. Read more
Does FCA’s secondary goal clash with its day job? Q&A: Kern Alexander, University of Zurich. Read more
Missteps by the Democrats offer valuable lessons. Opinion: Evgueni Ivantsov, ERMC. Read more
Vast differences between jurisdictions breeds uncertainty. Analysis: Victor Smart. Read more
The FCA’s eye-opening survey should be an annual affair. Opinion: Rob Mason, Global Relay. Read more
Legacy systems stall firms’ compliance with MiFID. Analysis: Ellesheva Kissin. Read more
Crimes that don’t “bang, bleed or shout” get missed. Opinion: City of London Police Authority Board. Read more
Financial regulator starts working on a new “guidebook”. Singapore FinTech Festival: Natasha Teja. Read more
Farah Khalique
Editor, Banking Risk & Regulation
Risk Generalist
3 个月The problem on the AI article is the pace of change. Also, I doubt we will see consistent regulation around AI due to national interests. I agree with the article that gettting a cohesive global framework may require new global bodies being created.