Budget Cutting Alternative: Rationalising The Global Brand Marketing Operating Model
Boris Ziegler
Scaling brand growth | Uber, HBO Max, Amazon Ring, Nike | international expansion | go-to-market strategy | capability building | execution support | global brand | global creative | global ecommerce
Instead of making indiscriminate cuts, which may provide quick savings, but will compromise the organisations marketing and brand building capability, economising across and within the global brand marketing operating model will achieve same if not greater costs reduction, but as a result of a higher productivity.
In the current economic climate, businesses worldwide are navigating through the dual challenges of high inflation and the looming threat of a recession. High inflation rates have led to increased costs for raw materials, labor, and other essential expenses, eroding profit margins and putting pressure on operational budgets. At the same time, fears of an impending recession have dampened consumer confidence, resulting in reduced spending and lower sales for many companies.
Faced with these economic pressures, businesses are implementing a range of cost-cutting measures to stay afloat. One of the most immediate and noticeable adjustments is the significant reduction in marketing budgets. Marketing, often seen as a discretionary expense, is frequently one of the first areas to be trimmed when financial constraints tighten.
Cutting marketing budgets, however, is not without its risks.
Most companies across the world have already taken cost-cutting measures and are sharpening the knives for more
The Usual Response : Axing The Marketing Budgets?
As global economy is heading towards recession, many companies are trying to shore up their top lines by cutting marketing spend. Gartner's Annual CMO Spend Survey Reveals?2024 Average Budgets Have Fallen by 15%, As CMOs Pursue Growth in the 'Era of Less' Average marketing budgets have fallen to 7.7% of overall company revenue, down from 9.1% in 2023, according to a Gartner, Inc. survey of 395 CMOs and marketing leaders
Gartner's Annual CMO Spend Survey Reveals?2024 Average Budgets Have Fallen by 15%,
So what will be the impact on marketing, media and advertising? Well, what happens in most organizations in the time of fiscal restraint is that marketing budgets are cut. Back in 2007 – 2009 recession this was usually a 30% cut plus. “CMOs are living in an ‘era of less’,” said?Ewan McIntyre, VP Analyst and the Chief of Research for the?Gartner Marketing Practice. “In the four years preceding the pandemic, average marketing budgets were 11% of overall revenue. In the four years since, they’ve dropped to an anemic 8.2%.”
In the four years preceding the pandemic, average marketing budgets were 11% of overall revenue. In the four years since, they’ve dropped to an anemic 8.2%.”
Should marketing budgets be cut, is another story. Advertising industry is, understandably, eager to argue against budgets cuts in times of recession. In fact, it present arguments, sound enough, that brands who invest during times of recession, will reap extra benefits. Reasoning goes that with market less cluttered, messaging is more effective, rewarding companies with higher market shares and sales. And there is some historical and scientific evidence to support this claim. "The best marketers will be upping, not cutting, their budgets" claims Mark Ritson, a brand consultant and former marketing professor, in an article for MarketingWeek, offering the data backed studies of marketing effect on the company sales & market share during and post-recession by several authors such as Roland Vaile, Alex Biel and Stepehn King and Gerry Tellis.
For example, Vaile's research results of 1920s recession and company behaviour in terms of marketing investments demonstrated that companies that increased their ad budgets during the recession grew sales much faster than their rivals – not only during the downturn but also beyond it.
Taking into account the importance of brand marketing communication, as prerequisite for market share and sales growth, exploring an alternative approach to cost cutting within the global marketing function might be worthwhile.
Budget Cutting Alternative : Rationalising The Global Brand Marketing Operating Model
With a knife already in hand, the fastest and easiest cut to make is on most visible elements of global marketing function costs - marketing budgets (media & agency costs). Although most obvious and most prominent, indiscriminate chopping of marketing budgets might actually do more damage than good. Both in short term and especially in the long term - both for the brand equity, market share and sales prospectives - both during and after the recession.
Indiscriminate chopping marketing budgets might actually do more damage than good.
Instead of making indiscriminate cuts, which may provide quick savings, but will compromise the organisations' marketing and brand building capability, economising across and within the global brand marketing operating model will achieve same if not greater costs reduction, but as a result of a higher productivity. And this is the main difference between the two approaches. First one looks to make the cuts from 'as is' state of operations, while the other aims to reconfigure how business done to produce savings both in terms of money and organisational time.
Rationalising across and within the global brand marketing operating model will achieve same if not greater costs reduction, but as a result of a higher productivity
As defined in the paper titled "Activating Global Operating Models : Bridge from Organisation Design to Performance, published in the Journal of Organisational Design, by A.Kates and G.Kesler : " the global operating model is the artful combination of organizational structures, processes, governance mechanisms, metrics, and reward systems that tie together center-based business and functional teams with far-flung geographic teams in order to execute complex business strategies around the world". Applying this definition to an individual function of global brand marketing, our economisation proposal turns from indiscriminate marketing budget cuts, to cost scrutinisation of the relationship between HQ and country teams in global brand marketing execution.
Our rationalisation proposal turns from indiscriminate marketing budget cuts, to cost scrutinisation of the relationship between HQ and country teams in global-to-local brand marketing execution.
Namely, global operating model of brand marketing function is plagued by complexity costs. J.B Steenkamp, emphasises this in chapter "Organizational Structures for Global Brands" of his 2017 published book " Global Brand Strategy : World-wise Marketing in the Age of Branding", giving them a collective name - global brand paradox. In global brand management a 'global brand paradox' describes the situation where complexity costs or the organisational setup of a global organisation outweighs the benefits of global brand as a marketing strategy. What happens is that even though global organisations initially reap benefits from global branding approach in terms of global reach and cost production saving, in the process of going global they become so big and so complex, that managing a global brand creates it's own, newly created, and previously unknown costs - complexity costs of global organisations.
Hidden in the configuration of organizational structures complexity costs of global brand marketing function amount to millions of euros every year.
How can we help?
Hidden in the configuration of organizational structures, (lack of) processes, governance mechanisms, metrics, and reward systems, complexity costs of global brand marketing function amount to millions of euros every year. Prioritising growth over internal efficiency during the years of prosperity, global brand marketing teams have grown accustomed to turning a blind eye to rampant waste of time and money in global execution. Budget and role duplication, endless agency rosters and roles, competitive infighting between headquarters and countries and failed projects are just some of money drains that syphon away hundreds of thousands if not millions of euros every year.
领英推荐
Global brand marketing teams have grown accustomed to turning a blind eye to rampant waste of time and money in global execution
Reconfiguring how global-to-local brand marketing is done we we were able to save clients millions of euros in cost. For specifics please check out our client cases available on the website below or schedule a call with us.
Some of the tactics of rationalisation & economisation
Cost and efficiency gains from centrally managing digital brands are one of the driving forces to increasing centralisation of digital brand marketing management. Having a centrally assembled team that runs global operations saves both time and budgets rather than having multiple national teams working with different vendors / agencies. It prevents duplication of work, and duplication of costs. We help clients initiate and drive movement of (digital) brand management from territories/local units to central or headquarter teams. As centralisation means abdication of part of authority, autonomy and budgets by country offices, we carefully strategise and execute the transition to make sure this change does not create permanent organisational rifts and future competitive infighting.
Global brand campaign execution architecture stemming from notoriously non-process driven brand function nestled within a complex matrix organisation is often a source of colossal waste of time, money, data and missed opportunities. With creation of clear roles, steps and collaboration processes enforced through a tailored digital solution we help avoid misunderstandings, duplication and chaos in execution which cost both money (agency overtime charges) and time (extra hours staff time). Digitised execution is benchmarked & continuously optimised, while global brand marketing execution know-how and best-practices in shape of digital solution features is permanently institutionalised.
Digital decoupling— a process where marketing and brand teams separate and work with different partners to complete creative and production activities. Significant cost savings resulting from moving production of digital work to lower cost locations and improved efficiency gained from having a dedicated team with deep digital production capabilities to serve clients. Global brands are able to save as much as 30-60 percent using the digital decoupling approach. In the process of digital decoupling we move the implementation & adaptation to Balkan country based hubs while creating tailored digital ordering & production relationship management process that simplify & streamline collaboration.
As business grows and reorganisations come and go Individual roles and their tasks are inspected and their priorities re-focused by removing non-value adding activities either thorough outsourcing to an external partner or digitisation within the platform solutions.
As majority of branding operations are done through email chains data is lost and unrecorded in a systematic way and branding decisions are made based on gut feelings and personal experience. Without a centralised system which would treat global branding execution as a business process, data is lost, and trapped in individual inboxes or at best on organisational levels (such as EMEA or a single country). By introducing platform solutions at different departments/ stakeholders / workflows we're able to capture process data & generate insights to guide operational improvements of organisational execution.
When it comes to implementation of digital transformation projects, few things can go as wrong as with its most complex, yet crucial element - people. Digital transformation is not just an IT project. To be done well, it drives a massive shift in human behaviour. To get rapid results and highest returns on digital investments we use several digital adoption strategies to foster behaviour change and adoption of new - digital tool enabled ways of working. Our user adoption team believes you have to ease the change for employees and prepare them for the transition as a team. That’s possible when executive and program team leaders communicate designs, definitions, processes, and information about functionality with key stakeholders as soon as decisions are made.
References :
Kates, A., & Kesler, G. (2015). Activating Global Operating Models: The bridge from organization design to performance.?Journal of Organization Design,?4(2), 38-47.
Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict. (2017). Organizational Structures for Global Brands. 10.1057/978-1-349-94994-6_6.?
Anna Maria Virzi, "Gartner Poll: 65% of Marketers Brace for Budget Cuts Due to COVID-19", Gartner for Marketeers. https://blogs.gartner.com/anna-maria-virzi/2020/03/20/gartner-poll-65-marketers-brace-budget-cuts-due-covid-19/
Sarah Vizard, "It’s the recession on steroids’: Why brands need to think long-term amid the coronavirus pandemic, MarketingWeek.com . https://www.marketingweek.com/coronavirus-long-term-brand-building/
Darren Woolley, "Coronavirus: how will agencies survive marketing budget reduction?" The Drum, https://www.thedrum.com/opinion/2020/03/06/coronavirus-how-will-agencies-survive-marketing-budget-reduction
Jennifer Faull, ‘The rule book has been ripped up’: agencies rethink pitching during coronavirus slowdown" The Drum https://www.thedrum.com/news/2020/04/07/the-rule-book-has-been-ripped-up-agencies-rethink-pitching-during-coronavirus
Mark Ritson, "The best marketers will be upping, not cutting, their budgets", MarketingWeek https://www.marketingweek.com/mark-ritson-marketing-spend-recession-coronavirus/
Gartner,Gartner CMO Survey Reveals Marketing Budgets Have Dropped to 7.7% of Overall Company Revenue in 2024 https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2024-05-13-gartner-cmo-survey-reveals-marketing-budgets-have-dropped-to-seven-point-seven-percent-of-overall-company-revenue-in-202