The Economics of MORE

The Economics of MORE

Wall Street's 'Economic System' is a precarious house of cards built on demand for unlimited growth.

Once upon a time there was a simple, ethical way for an honest ‘capitalist’ to earn money.

You would invest in a company you believed in; which provided quality goods or services for which there was a market; which was managed by people you had confidence in.?Your investment would provide the company with the capital it needed to get started.?

You would invest by buying shares in the company, and thus become a shareholder. The company would use your money to buy whatever it needed to produce the good or services; it employed people and earned their loyalty; it would sell to customers and make a profit.?Eventually, some of this profit would be paid back to the shareholders as a dividend.

So if you bought a share for $100, and you received an annual dividend of $10, that would be a very healthy 10% return.

This was an Honest Sustainable Profit.?

Let’s say it was a manufacturing company.?One year it sold 10,000 units and gave you a dividend of $10.?The following year it sold 11,000 units and gave you a dividend of $11.?The following year it sold 12,000 units, and gave you a dividend of $12.?You were content with this Honest Sustainable Profit, and with the steady growth as well.?

Then the following year, there was a global downtown for reasons which were?entirely outside the control?of the CEO.?The company sold only 9,000 units – but it still made an Honest Sustainable Profit and it gave you a dividend of $9.

-?????????You didn’t get mad.

-?????????You didn’t scream for the CEO to be fired.

-?????????The CEO didn’t panic and lay off people and consolidate manufacturing plants to show you that he was cutting costs.?

-?????????You didn’t sell the shares in disgust.?

This was the old model of economics, based on the actual creation of value (ie goods and services, ie real ‘stuff’).?As long as you could do so profitably, there was no need to get anxious.?And you would keep those shares for years, decades even.?You could leave them to your children, so that they could enjoy the Honest Sustainable Profit which came from those companies.

But then, some greedy and crafty people decided that they weren’t interested in an Honest Sustainable Profit of around 10% per year.?They decided that they wanted to?double or triple?their money, in a?very short space of time.

They figured out that they could sell the shares to some other individual, for more money than they had paid originally.?They would try to sell each share, for which they had originally paid $100, to someone else for $150.?In order to do this, they had to convince the potential buyer that?he?would later (maybe next year) be able to sell the share to?yet another?buyer, for even more money, say $200.

For this scheme to work, they had to find a reason why the shares would be worth more money next year.?There had to be a reason why the share price would go up.

And the reason was GROWTH.?

Now the shareholders no longer cared about Honest Sustainable Profit giving them a reliable 10% return every year.?They demanded that the CEO make the company grow, every quarter, every year.?They demanded the expectation of bigger profits next year and the year after – so that they could sell the shares to someone else on the basis of this?future growth.?And that buyer would only buy the shares if he thought?he could find someone else?who would buy them for?yet more money.

Now it was no longer enough for the CEO to make an Honest Sustainable Profit every year.?He had to make more profit every year, year after year, to drive the share price up. So even if he managed to stay in profit despite conditions being really bad, that wasn’t good enough. He was no longer being measured on the Honest Sustainable Profit – he was being measured on the share price.

But growth year-after-year meant:

MORE consumption.

MORE debt (both corporate and personal).

MORE destruction.

MORE waste.

MORE pollution.

Nobody asked the Earth if she could absorb unlimited growth – the Economics of MORE.

And she began to feel unwell.

But this didn’t matter to these new shareholders.?Once they had bought the shares on the expectation of future growth, the only way for them to make a profit was to sell the shares for more money.?The Honest Sustainable Profit and the resulting dividends were not going to bring any positive return.??In fact, they didn’t even care about these any more.?They wanted only?rapid share price appreciation?and they didn’t care what the company had to do to deliver the necessary growth or expectation of growth – borrowing, acquiring, over-extending itself,?whatever.? Healthy cash flow no longer mattered as much as projected growth that would positively influence the share price.?

The CEO was being forced to put the share price before Honest Sustainable Profit, and he would do anything that would make the share price appreciate.

Then the greedy and crafty people realised something.?

It really didn’t matter whether:?the company was making an Honest Sustainable Profit; whether it provided quality goods and services for which there was a market; whether it was managed by smart people with integrity.?All that mattered was if the price of the ticker symbol could be made to move.

They realised that they could make money from the?movement?of the ticker symbol.?All that mattered now was?movement?of the share price.

The ticker symbol had become detached from the company it supposedly represented.?

All the greedy and crafty people needed to do was to create waves with the share price of XYZ.?They would then ride each wave (big and small), and jump off just when it fizzled out.?

Eventually, the greedy and crafty people were using supercomputers to do all of this.??The supercomputers could track share price waves, quantify the momentum, project how far they would go, and calculate the most profitable moment to jump off.?They made the greedy and crafty people so obscenely wealthy, they became the Super-Elite.

Shares would be bought and sold within days, hours, minutes, even seconds (but this was still called ‘investment’). The supercomputers became better and better at predicting the share price waves’ behavior.?

Some firms even moved from New Jersey to Manhattan to shave tenths of a second off computer network response times – this was still called 'investment' (but it sounds like 'gaming').

The poor CEOs carried on running their companies as best they could, even firing thousands of people and endlessly restructuring the business units, hoping to improve the company’s share price.?Every little bit of ‘news’ could be used to move the share price, and with every movement, the Super-Elite made some money.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

General Electric was a company with a solid history and reputation for: innovation, quality, high performance employees, profitability.

During Jeff Immelt's first seven years on the job as CEO, GE's revenues increased by more than 60%, its profits doubled, but its share price languished and fell significantly. ?According to one analyst: “GE’s just not sexy.”

Eventually, the demand for share price growth – rather then revenue and profitability – allowed Wall Street to drive the destruction of GE.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Similarly, Boeing was a highly regarded company with a solid reputation for innovation, high quality, reliability, safety.

But such higher quality meant higher costs.

Wall Street drove Boeing's merger with McDonnell Douglas.

Wall Street demanded cost reductions to increase share price.

Cost reductions required compromises in quality.

Wall Street's demands caused those crashes.

Wall Street's system of 'investment' demanding share price appreciation – rather than Honest Sustainable Profit – killed those people.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Super-Elite then discovered that they could make money even when a share price was going down, by ‘shorting’ the ticker symbol.?All they had to do was ride the wave on the way up, jump off just when it peaked, then ride it again on the way down by taking ‘short’ positions.?All that mattered was movement, not fundamentals.?The supercomputers (which were getting better and better) could predict and track the waves, and calculate precisely when to jump off, for maximum profit.

Nobody gave a damn about Honest Sustainable Profit.??Movement of the share price was all that mattered.?And any piece of ‘news’ which could create some movement was snatched up and broadcast widely.? A whole industry sprang up to provide this ‘news’, and now everyone was giving ‘stock tips’.?

But in order for the Super-Elite to ‘make money’, there had to be some money being put into the market for them to take.

Enter Mr & Mrs SHEEP.

Mr & Mrs SHEEP believed in concepts like ‘financial planning’, ‘taking responsibility’ and ‘investing for the future’.?Mr & Mrs SHEEP were led to believe that choosing shares wisely for investment would give them a long term return.? But they too had lost sight of Honest Sustainable Profit, and were confused by the illusion of share price growth – because this was how everyone seemed to be making so much money.? Literally: ‘making money’.?(This ‘money’ was almost completely detached from the actual performance of the companies – good or bad.)?

Everyone was telling Mr & Mrs SHEEP to put their money into the market, and giving them endless advice on where to put it.?

Mr & Mrs SHEEP put their money – with careful research and consideration – into the market.?

But the market was no longer about Honest Sustainable Profit. It was about creating ticker symbol waves up and waves down.? Riding the waves was the only way to make money – not the profit from each company.? But without a supercomputer, these ‘investors’ didn’t have a chance.?

They just became part of the waves which the Super-Elite were generating and owning.?

Ordinary people still called this ‘investment’.?They still thought they were smart.? But without the supercomputers, they were just sheep.

Of course, sometimes they did make money, and it was important that they did do so.?As long as they made money occasionally, they could be convinced that this was due to their own careful research and astute judgment – and so they would carry on ‘investing’.?

The Super-Elite realised that they could do the same with currency.?They created a ‘news’ industry around currency; they created a system of ‘wave generation’ in the movement of currencies; and their supercomputers tracked and predicted these waves to maximise profit.?

The Super-Elite had found ways of ‘making’ obscene amounts of money, without actually producing anything, without providing any useful service – without doing any work.

Work was for ordinary people.

But the Super-Elite made money without doing anything useful – without producing any goods or providing any service.? Without creating any True Value.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

How can $100 billion be lost in days?

Because it's not True Value.

This 'value' depends entirely on being able to find sheep who will buy shares because they believe that they will be able to sell them later to other dumber sheep for more money, who believe that they will be able to sell them later to other even dumber sheep for even more money ... more ... more ... more ...

Eventually, the availability of dumber sheep dries up.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And then the Super-Elite became really arrogant.?They found that their money gave them Power.?They could control politicians.?They could control the ‘News’.?They could distract ordinary people from noticing what was going on.?They made them think that Sports and?who’s-doing-who?in Hollywood was News.??They made them think that anyone who worried about the Earth was a liar and a communist.?

The?real News?was completely lost.?

They could even control the government – taking the country to war to use weapons which their own companies designed and produced, making themselves even more obscenely wealthy.?And causing the country to over-extend itself year-after-year.?

And then, in a supreme act of arrogance, the Super-Elite fixed it with the President so that they?paid less tax?on their obscene profits from doing nothing, whilst the regular people paid a lot more on the wages from their jobs.?

And the Super-Elite were so clever, they used the media and the ‘News’ to convince some ordinary people that this was all just fine.?

So:

Farmers grow food.

Teachers teach children.

Soldiers die for their country.

Nurses care for sick people (the ones who have insurance).

And they all pay about 30% tax.?

But the Super-Elite pay much less tax on their paper trading activities, which add no real value and create and innovate nothing.

The military-industrial-fastfood-pharmaceutical-sports-media-healthcare-insurance-justice-prisons complex has become an entrenched, interconnected mirage of an 'economic system' embedded with severe inequality, injustice, reckless excess, environmental destruction, disinformation, violence and oppression.

And it requires unlimited growth to remain functional.

But the Earth and human society will no longer tolerate unlimited growth.

And now Sports …

... please Share ...