Economic Loss Doctrine Decision

Economic Loss Doctrine Decision

Economic Loss Rule Case

In the case captioned District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority ("DC Water") brought suit against Samaha Associates, PC ("Samaha"), Adtek Engineers, Inc., and ECS Mid-Atlantic, LLC, seeking compensatory damages related to the Defendants' assessment of environmental conditions on a property DC Water acquired. ECF 30 (First Amended Complaint) If 1. Subsequently, Cross-Plaintiff, Adtek Engineers, Inc. ("Adtek"), sued Cross-Defendant ECS Mid-Atlantic, LLC ("ECS"). The Court found that the Economic Loss Rule barred the Architect’s claim against its consultants, who did not owe any tort duty to the architect’s client.? Check your jurisdiction, because where it applies the economic loss rule is a powerful tool for design professionals.

?Dist. of Columbia Water & Sewer Auth. v. Samaha Assocs., PC, CIVIL 23-01328-BAH, (D. Md. Apr. 9, 2024)

@amesgough

@leeshoemaker

David S.

Professional Civil Engineer

1 个月

Interesting! Is there a link to another article or similar that has more information on this case. I know all of these firms (either worked at or on teams with), so I am curious. Thanks

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Lauren Rhodes Martin的更多文章

  • Contract Termination

    Contract Termination

    This was a case related to the termination of a contract between a homeowner and a design firm. The project was on an…

  • Certificate of Merit

    Certificate of Merit

    This project involved the widening of pavement, and AECOM Technical Services Inc., who was the Engineer sued their…

  • Site Safety Case

    Site Safety Case

    In the wrongful death case captioned The Estate of Juan Jose Triana Fuenmayor v Goya Foods et al, the engineer was…

  • Certificate of Merit Decision

    Certificate of Merit Decision

    In Texas in the case of Kudela & Weinheimer, LP v De Dios Arriaga, 2023 Tex. App.

  • Contractual Provisions are Important

    Contractual Provisions are Important

    In the case of Markel American Insurance Company v. MR.

  • Architect Not Responsible for Site Safety

    Architect Not Responsible for Site Safety

    In the case of Bonilla v. Verges Rome Architects, 2023-00928 (La.

  • FHA Claims

    FHA Claims

    In the case of Clover Communities Beavercreek, LLC v Mussachio Architects PC, 2023 U.S.

  • Third-Party Beneficiaries

    Third-Party Beneficiaries

    In the case of Walton Global Investments Ltd. v Bowman Consulting Group Ltd 2023 U.

  • Duty

    Duty

    In the case of 21 Park Place NY L.P.

    1 条评论
  • Standard of Care Decision

    Standard of Care Decision

    In the case of Pennington v Memorial Hospital of South Bend inc. 206 N.

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了