Is East vs. West Still the Best format? Why the NBA Finals Needs a Change
Sgwili Gumede
Commercial Leadership | Marketing Leadership | Sport Business | Sport Marketing
The NBA Finals, is one of the world's most iconic and highly anticipated competition finals. The globalization of basketball and the NBA has meant that even though this is a domestic competition, its appeal, and the players involved reflect the global reach and allure of a truly global competition. It's a marquee matchup, a clash of titans, a battle for basketball supremacy. Or is it? The NBA championship series has been a best-of-seven showdown between the Eastern and Western Conference champions for decades. But in a league where parity reigns supreme and conferences are increasingly fluid, is the current format still truly serving the sport, the players, and the fans?
While steeped in tradition, the current system presents a glaring problem: it prioritizes conference parity over pure basketball excellence. Imagine a scenario where the two undisputed best teams in the league- Celtics and Bucks–reside in the Eastern Conference. The current format requires the two juggernauts, the Celtics and Bucks, to eliminate each other before the Finals, resulting in a championship matchup that might not necessarily display the absolute pinnacle of basketball.
This hypothetical situation isn't entirely unrealistic. Take the 2024 season, for example. While the Celtics were the best team in the Eastern Conference, the rest of the top four teams were all from the West. In 2023, the East boasted the top three seeds, but their path to the Finals involved eliminating each other, in several titanic clashes with the last man standing in the East ultimately facing a Western Conference team that arrived at the finals perhaps freshest having not had much competition en route to the finals. It cannot be that the league will be happy with a scenario where one conference and stream is easier than the next and in effect create an artificial scenario where the final is not the best of the best but a quota of sorts which dictates one team must come from each conference no matter how poor it is. That is not merit, is it? It is a disconnect between conference dominance and overall league strength that robs fans of the ultimate spectacle, the best 2 teams going head-to-head.
Here's why it's time for the NBA to embrace a more globally accepted approach to its championship series:
1. Prioritizing pure basketball: The NBA Finals should be the culmination of an entire season's worth of striving. The two teams that have consistently proven themselves throughout the playoffs, regardless of conference, deserve the right to battle it out for the title. This format ensures that the cream truly rises to the top, offering a more satisfying conclusion to the season.
2. Enhanced narrative and excitement: Imagine the buzz surrounding a potential Celtic vs. Heat or Warriors vs. Lakers Finals, a rematch of epic proportions. Or a fresh clash between two rising stars, each leading their respective teams on a championship run. Removing the conference barrier opens the door for more interesting storylines and heightened anticipation for the Finals.
3. Greater player motivation: Knowing that the path to conference affiliation doesn't restrict the championship could incentivize every team to push even harder throughout the regular season. Every matchup becomes crucial, every win counts and every player will be striving to be part of the best team regardless of conference affiliation.
4. Elevating the global appeal: The NBA is an international brand, and its championship series should reflect that. By adopting the best-of-the-best format, the league would align itself with the standard practised by most major sports leagues worldwide. This fosters a more inclusive and universally appealing Finals experience.
5. Live up to the principle of the Best of the best: The idea that the NBA can never have a final between Lakers and Warriors or Celtics vs Heat sounds strange, if not absurd. Or that finals in one conference could be between teams that could not have made the playoff in the other conference is a bit farcical.
Some might argue that the current format ensures a competitive balance, preventing one "super team" or super division from dominating the league. While this is a valid concern, the NBA already has multiple mechanisms in place to guard against these, like the salary cap and draft lottery system that strive for parity. Additionally, the suggested change wouldn't eliminate conferences, it just ensures that the sport delivers the best result for the sport, the fans and everybody concerned. They would still serve a purpose for seeding and potentially, even regional rivalries. But the playoffs will simply play across conferences so that if the two best teams emerge from the same conference, it will be accepted. ?Another concern might be potential travel fatigue for teams playing across conferences throughout the playoffs. We could address this by adjusting the playoff schedule to account for longer travel distances. Even making playoffs as best of five and only the final as best of seven.
The NBA Finals should be the ultimate showcase of basketball brilliance. While steeped in tradition, the current system hinders this goal by prioritizing conference supremacy over pure athletic merit. By adopting the best-of-the-best format, the NBA can elevate the Finals to a truly global spectacle, offering fans the ultimate battle, the best versus the best. It also brings the NBA in line with global sports where merit and merit determine who makes the finals, not a league-imposed quota system. I imagine a World Cup in football that can never have Germany vs England or Brazil vs Argentina in the final because they are in the same region/division, crazy isn't it? Well, that is what basketball premier competition has at the moment. This idea is therefore a natural evolution for a league that continues pushing the sport's boundaries as well as global reach and appeal. It's time for the NBA to embrace the future and let the best teams compete for the ultimate prize regardless of conference. It feels like this will make this championship truly hold more value for the winner than it does at the moment.
#SportBusiness #SportIndustry #SportBiz #Sponsorships #Sports #Basketball #NBA #Sportmarketing #Sportmedia
Strategic B2B Brand Architect | Elevating Presence & Awareness for Unparalleled Market Impact | Expert in Crafting Distinctive Brand Positioning
4 个月Couldn't agree more. I think that'll enhance the 'product' of the National Basketball Association (NBA) finals for certain. However I can't help but feel that a cut from an 82 game season is would be equally beneficial. More isn't always more... the National Football League (NFL) knows this all too well.