E-Gas 3 Level Monitoring Concept

E-Gas 3 Level Monitoring Concept

March 20th, 2022, Issue no.32, ISO 26262

This series is dedicated to the absolute automotive functional safety beginners, system engineers or software engineers or anyone who wants to know about automotive functional safety ISO 26262 standard from ZERO. Disclaimer, this series and only expresses the author view to the ISO 26262 and not to the view of any company, institution or organization.


E-Gas Concept

Back to the 90's before ISO 26262, the E-Gas standard was created to demonstrate the state of the art of functional safety of gas engines. This concept can be extended to different item definitions not just e-gas engines.

What is E-Gas concept 3 level monitoring?

It is the monitoring levels of E-Gas system; it is divided into 3 sufficiently independent level for a better organization and development of FuSa processes.

No alt text provided for this image

  • Level 1 --> Intended control function with QM(x)
  • Level 2 --> Function monitoring with ASIL x(x)
  • Level 3 --> Controller monitoring with ASIL x

Level 2

Therefore, you build your control function with QM integrity and add another independent layer on different core ( lockstep) with different algorithm/implementation.

This L2 checks L1 errors and go to safe state within L2_FTTI.

Level 3

Test controller reliability and check accumulated latent faults at the integrated safety mechanisms of the MCU's. This is BIST of the core check, ECC, clock monitor unit, power management controller, MPU, and lockstep which are allocated on the same MCU.

L3 is divided into two parts:

First part: inside the main MCU

Second part: can be another MCU, ASIC or SBC ( PMIC)

Reducing Hazardous Events

Why do you consider this E-Gas concept is useful?

No alt text provided for this image

Because we have an increasing number of complex automotive systems and we do need a concept to allocate the functional safety on different independent layers of protection.

If we are observing Safety provision 1, there might be a single point of fault that would let the fault to propagate to the next layer Safety provision 2. It is a low probability that the second layer would propagate the same fault in a similar way up to the interface on the vehicle level where an accident can occur.

Therefore, different independent layers are crucial to reduce the risk likelihood.

Hence, E-Gas concept provides a simple concept for safety layers that can be utilized in different automotive systems.

Conclusion

Adoption of E-Gas 3 level monitoring would help us to focus on the distribution of the safety mechanisms on the item definition. Next time, you would say, we have and an issue in a L3 safety mechanism.


Reference

  • E-Gas standard
  • Google images


Pau Sort

Sr. Hardware / System Safety Engineer

15 小时前

Thanks for the explanation. I also have a question: At which level would you introduce the voltage regulators that would feed, for example, gate drivers of a DCDC Converter? The OV/UV, EN, and PGs mainly. Thank you!

回复
Vinod M Prabhu

Functional Safety | Cybersecurity | Software Architecture | Process Design & Strategy | DevOps

2 年

AbdelRahman Hassan thanks for the digit! I have a short question. What the rationale behind allocating QM(x) under L2 rather than L1. since QM(x) can be treated as intended functionality as per ASIL decomposition shouldn’t it allocated to L1 along with QM?

Bhargav Chava

Sr Functional Safety Software Engineer @ Rivian | Automotive Functional Safety Expert

2 年

Hi Abdel, Thanks for posting this article. I have seen lot of examples discussing level 3 to protect microcontroller related level 2 failures. Can this level 3 also be used for systematic sw protection for sw features and their monitors ? Level 1 implements feature Level 2 implements monitor Level 3 implements Self test for monitor Can this be a way of implementation?

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Hassan Higazy的更多文章

  • Good Enough Safety Analysis

    Good Enough Safety Analysis

    May 9th, 2024, Issue no.40, ISO 26262 This series is dedicated to automotive functional safety beginners, managers…

    3 条评论
  • Freedom from temporal interference

    Freedom from temporal interference

    Sep 16th, 2023, Issue no.39, ISO 26262 This series is dedicated to automotive functional safety beginners, managers…

    9 条评论
  • Model-based development and functional safety

    Model-based development and functional safety

    July 23rd, 2023, Issue no.38, ISO 26262 This series is dedicated to automotive functional safety beginners, managers…

    8 条评论
  • Freedom From Interference: Watchdog Manager Safety Mechanism (II)

    Freedom From Interference: Watchdog Manager Safety Mechanism (II)

    April 29th, 2023, Issue no.37, ISO 26262 This series is dedicated to automotive functional safety beginners, system…

    5 条评论
  • Freedom From Interference: Watchdog Manager Safety Mechanism (I)

    Freedom From Interference: Watchdog Manager Safety Mechanism (I)

    Jan 29th, 2023, Issue no.36, ISO 26262 This series is dedicated to automotive functional safety beginners, system…

    5 条评论
  • A proven in-use: the FuSa dark corner

    A proven in-use: the FuSa dark corner

    October 10th, 2022, Issue no.35, ISO 26262 This series is dedicated to automotive functional safety beginners, system…

    6 条评论
  • Pay much less by ASIL Tailoring

    Pay much less by ASIL Tailoring

    May 8th, 2022, Issue no.33, ISO 26262 This series is dedicated to the absolute automotive functional safety beginners…

    12 条评论
  • Steering SW Architecture Under Analyses

    Steering SW Architecture Under Analyses

    Jan 15th, 2022, Issue no.31, ISO 26262-6:2018, Development on Software Level This series is dedicated to the absolute…

    2 条评论
  • Software Architecture Analyses: Electric Power Steering EPS

    Software Architecture Analyses: Electric Power Steering EPS

    September 12nd, 2021, Issue no.30, ISO 26262-6:2018, Development on Software Level This series is dedicated to the…

    16 条评论
  • Freedom From Interference: exchange of information

    Freedom From Interference: exchange of information

    August 1st, 2021, Issue no.29, ISO 26262-6:2018, Development on Software Level This series is dedicated to the absolute…

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了