The Dynamics of Software Development Teams

Welcome to my LinkedIn newsletter! In each issue of Breaking the Build, I'll share my thoughts on software development through the looking glass of behavioural sciences. Subscribe to stay updated.

An exploration of the fluid dynamics within software development teams, examining the reasons behind team changes, methods of finding new teams, and the multifaceted impacts of these movements on individuals and organizations.

In this edition, we delve into the intricate dynamics of software development teams. We explore how these teams evolve, the reasons behind the frequent changes in team composition, and the broader impact these changes have on the software development process. Drawing on a comprehensive study conducted within a large software company, this chapter sheds light on the patterns and motivations behind team changes, offering insights into the human side of software engineering.

The dynamics of software development teams are a reflection of the industry's fast-paced nature. Engineers change teams to work on new products, grow their careers, and acquire new technical skills. However, these changes are not without consequences. They affect not only the individual's career trajectory but also the team's morale, productivity, and the overall quality of the software being developed.

Frequency of Team Changes

A striking characteristic of modern software engineering teams is the frequency with which engineers change teams. Our study revealed that team switches are a common occurrence throughout an engineer's career. It's not unusual for engineers to change teams, and often managers, even while remaining on the same project. This fluidity in team composition highlights a significant aspect of the software engineering culture - adaptability and continuous learning are not just encouraged but are often a necessity.

From the data gathered, it was found that full-time technical employees typically spend a median of 1.5 years with each manager, with a wide confidence interval ranging from as little as 5 months to as long as 6 years. This variability suggests a diverse range of experiences and motivations behind each move.

Average Duration in a Team

Regarding the length of time engineers spend on a specific team, the survey data paints an interesting picture. About 35% of respondents reported spending less than a year on their current team, while 33% spent 1–2 years. A smaller proportion, 24%, reported a tenure of 3–4 years, and only 8% stayed for more than four years. These findings indicate that the median time spent on a team is between 1 and 2 years, with a significant majority (92%) of engineers working in their current teams for 4 years or less.

This high turnover rate within teams suggests a dynamic environment where new ideas and perspectives are constantly introduced. However, it also highlights potential challenges in maintaining continuity and building long-term team cohesion.

The nature of team changes in software development underscores a culture of mobility and flexibility. Engineers often switch teams to pursue new challenges, enhance their skill sets, or align with shifting organizational priorities. This mobility, while beneficial in fostering a culture of learning and growth, also poses challenges in terms of knowledge transfer, team stability, and project continuity.

Reasons for Leaving a Team

In the fluid landscape of software development, understanding why engineers leave teams is crucial for managing team dynamics effectively. Based on the study conducted, several key reasons have been identified, clustered into six main categories.

Leave Cluster 1: Change is Coming

Engineers often anticipate or react to changes within their teams or organization. This includes not liking the technology stack, switching teams during a reorganization, or changes in team charter. Other factors like a manager leaving or high team turnover also play a significant role.

Leave Cluster 2: Seeking New Challenges or Location

This cluster represents the desire for new experiences and growth opportunities. It includes changing roles (e.g., from testing to development), wanting to work on a specific project, moving to a new geographical location, or simply seeking new challenges.

Leave Cluster 3: Dissatisfaction with Manager

A significant factor influencing team changes is dissatisfaction with management. This can be due to disagreement with a manager's priorities and goals or a general dislike for the manager's approach.

Leave Cluster 4: The Grass is Greener

This reason encompasses engineers' perception of better opportunities elsewhere. It includes reasons like wanting to try something new, finding an opportunity too good to pass up, or dissatisfaction with the management chain.

Leave Cluster 5: Not a Good Fit

Some engineers leave their teams simply because they feel out of place. This could be due to boredom, feeling that their skills are not needed, or not fitting well with the team's culture.

Leave Cluster 6: Poor Team Dynamics

Lastly, the dynamics within the team itself can be a reason for departure. Issues like team dysfunction or lack of growth opportunities can make engineers seek a change.

How Engineers Find New Teams

The process by which software engineers find new teams within an organization is as important as understanding why they leave their current teams. This aspect of team dynamics offers insight into the mechanisms of internal mobility and career progression in the software development sector.

Voluntary vs. Involuntary Moves

The study distinguishes between voluntary and involuntary team moves. Voluntary moves occur when engineers actively choose to switch teams, considering their options and making a deliberate choice. In contrast, involuntary moves are driven by external factors such as corporate reorganizations or project cancellations, leaving little to no choice for the employee. Approximately three-quarters of team changes were found to be voluntary.

Methods of Finding New Teams

When engineers consider leaving a team voluntarily, unless approached with an unsolicited job offer, they typically find new teams through three main avenues:

1. Word-of-Mouth: This is the most common method, with 63.4% of engineers finding new opportunities through informal networks and colleague recommendations.
2. Internal Job Postings: About 34.2% of engineers utilize job postings on internal websites to find new team opportunities.
3. Manager Referrals: In some cases, 9.4% of engineers find their new teams through their current or former managers.

Organizational Move Distance

An interesting aspect of team changes is the 'organizational move distance' – the number of managerial levels or divisions an engineer moves through within the organization during a team change. The study found a positive correlation between the voluntary nature of the move and the organizational distance traversed. Engineers who voluntarily chose their new team tended to move further within the organizational structure.

Final Thoughts

Based on the insights gained from the study on team dynamics in software development, this section provides recommendations and strategies for both engineers and managers. These suggestions aim to optimize team changes, enhance satisfaction, and ensure effective onboarding, thus contributing to both individual career growth and organizational success.

For Engineers

1. Active Networking: Utilize word-of-mouth and internal networks to explore new opportunities. These channels not only increase the likelihood of finding suitable roles but also correlate with higher move satisfaction.
2. Career Planning: Consider team changes as strategic steps in career development. Seek roles that offer new challenges, align with career goals, and provide opportunities for skill enhancement.
3. Onboarding Preparation: Be proactive in the onboarding process. Familiarize yourself with the new team's technology stack and work culture in advance, if possible, to minimize onboarding time.

For Managers

1. Facilitate Smooth Transitions: Support both incoming and outgoing team members. Ensure that knowledge transfer occurs effectively and that new members are integrated into the team with clear roles and expectations.
2. Monitor Team Dynamics: Pay attention to the reasons behind team changes. Address issues like management style, team cohesion, and personal growth opportunities to reduce unnecessary turnover.
3. Develop Onboarding Protocols: Establish structured onboarding processes that are tailored to the specific needs of the team and the incoming member. This can significantly reduce onboarding time and improve overall team productivity.

For Organizations

1. Promote Internal Mobility: Encourage a culture where internal transfers are seen as opportunities for growth and development. Implement policies that make internal moves transparent and accessible.
2. Data-Driven Decisions: Use insights from employee movement patterns to inform talent management strategies. Understanding why engineers leave and join teams can help in formulating more effective retention and recruitment policies.

Breaking the Build is an attempt to understand the human side of software development. Each issue draws upon decades of empirical research and insights from academia, enterprises, startups and open-source communities; to unravel hidden incentives, bust myths and challenge long held beliefs about building software.

Please subscribe to join and follow along in this journey!

More resources

• Trust dynamics in global software engineering by Samireh Jalali, ?i?dem Gencel Ambrosini and Darja Smite.
• A Study of the Organizational Dynamics of Software Teams by Michael Hilton and Andrew Begel.