Duty

Duty

In the case of 21 Park Place NY L.P. v ABN Realty LLC (2023 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1239) the engineer filed a Summary Judgment in a matter involving the collapse of an adjacent building during construction. The General Contractor filed a third-party claim against the Engineer, who took the position that their scope was simply a document review for the owner.? The Contractor took the position that emails indicated that they had also performed site visits, opined on the bearing walls and had met with Department of Building representatives.? The court found that the Engineer owned a viable legal duty to the Contractor if the evidence showed that they had provided engineering services of the project.? It is up to the courts to determine who the Engineer may owe a duty, and some take a more expansive view than others.? Additionally, it should be recognized that scope can be increased by actions.

Todd Duwel

Risk is opportunity waiting to be leveraged

10 个月

stakeholder "behavior" that becomes entrenched as project 'custom and practice' is often the silent assassin of well-intended risk management strategies.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Lauren Rhodes Martin的更多文章

  • Contract Termination

    Contract Termination

    This was a case related to the termination of a contract between a homeowner and a design firm. The project was on an…

  • Certificate of Merit

    Certificate of Merit

    This project involved the widening of pavement, and AECOM Technical Services Inc., who was the Engineer sued their…

  • Site Safety Case

    Site Safety Case

    In the wrongful death case captioned The Estate of Juan Jose Triana Fuenmayor v Goya Foods et al, the engineer was…

  • Economic Loss Doctrine Decision

    Economic Loss Doctrine Decision

    Economic Loss Rule Case In the case captioned District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority ("DC Water") brought suit…

    3 条评论
  • Certificate of Merit Decision

    Certificate of Merit Decision

    In Texas in the case of Kudela & Weinheimer, LP v De Dios Arriaga, 2023 Tex. App.

  • Contractual Provisions are Important

    Contractual Provisions are Important

    In the case of Markel American Insurance Company v. MR.

  • Architect Not Responsible for Site Safety

    Architect Not Responsible for Site Safety

    In the case of Bonilla v. Verges Rome Architects, 2023-00928 (La.

  • FHA Claims

    FHA Claims

    In the case of Clover Communities Beavercreek, LLC v Mussachio Architects PC, 2023 U.S.

  • Third-Party Beneficiaries

    Third-Party Beneficiaries

    In the case of Walton Global Investments Ltd. v Bowman Consulting Group Ltd 2023 U.

  • Standard of Care Decision

    Standard of Care Decision

    In the case of Pennington v Memorial Hospital of South Bend inc. 206 N.

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了