Duties and Liabilities of Insurance Brokers

Duties and Liabilities of Insurance Brokers

Excellence in Claims Handling

This blog post is just a taste of the full article that is only available to subscribers to Excellence in Claims Handling. Anyone can subscribe to “Excellence in Claims Handling” at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe for only $5 a month or $50 a year.

Order Taker or Fiduciary?

Cases in which insurance brokers’ liability is in question depend in part on whether brokers are seen to be serving a fiduciary role or simply acting as a conduit between the insured and the insurer.

A person or an entity is a fiduciary with respect to a plan to the extent:

  • he exercises any discretionary authority or discretionary control respecting management of such plan or
  • exercises any authority or control respecting management or disposition of its assets, or
  • he has any discretionary authority or discretionary responsibility in the administration of such plan.[1]

Since 2004, two California appellate courts have taken the still-developing position on the law regarding insurance broker liability in different directions. In Hydro-Mill Company Inc. v. Hayward, Tilton and Rolapp Insurance Associates Inc.,[2] the court reduced insurance brokers’ exposure to their clients whereas Century Surety Co. v. Crosby Insurance Inc.,[3] increased insurance brokers’ duties to the insurers with whom they do business on behalf of their clients.

In California an independent insurance broker is not an agent of the insurer, but rather of the insured.[4] In Hydro-Mill, the California Second District Court of Appeal cast doubt on whether an insurance broker serves in a fiduciary capacity.

By so doing it limited the ability of an aggrieved client to obtain punitive damages as a result of the broker’s error. In reaching its conclusion the court noted that:

A fiduciary relationship has been defined as ‘any relation existing between parties to a transaction wherein one of the parties is . . . duty bound to act with the utmost good faith for the benefit of the other party.’

Such a relation ordinarily arises where a confidence is reposed by one person in the integrity of another, and in such a relation the party in whom the confidence is reposed, if he voluntarily accepts or assumes to accept the confidence, can take no advantage from his acts relating to the interest of the other party without the latter’s knowledge or consent.” (In re Marriage of Varner (1997) 55 Cal. App.4th 128, 141.)

Despite the seeming trend of cases in California to analogize the insurer — insured relationship to a fiduciary relationship, the cases which have directly addressed this point have held that this relationship does not produce a fiduciary duty. [Hassard, Bonnington, Roger & Huber v. Home Ins., 740 F. Supp. 789 (S.D. Cal. 1990)]

In Henry v. Associated Indemnity, 217 Cal.App.3d 1405, 266 Cal. Rptr. 578 (1990), the court held that there was no fiduciary duty between an insurer and an insured. The plaintiffs urge that Henry should not be controlling because it ignored apposite California Supreme Court authority. This is not the case. The Henry court stated "We ... find no support in case law, other than dicta in a few Supreme Court cases, which would support such a theory as to the insurers."

This is just a taste of the full article that is only available to subscribers to Excellence in Claims Handling and access to many more articles that are published on a regular basis. If you want to read the full article subscribe to “Excellence in Claims Handling” at? https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe or only $5 a month or $50 a year.

(c) 2025 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.

Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.

Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe

Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg


Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk

Subscribe to “Excellence in Claims Handling” at? https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe or only $5 a month or $50 a year.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE的更多文章

  • CGL Policy not a Course of Construction Policy

    CGL Policy not a Course of Construction Policy

    Damage Before Project is Complete Excluded by CGL Post 5013 Posted on March 12, 2025 by Barry Zalma Consolidated…

  • Sixteen Years in Prison for Stalking

    Sixteen Years in Prison for Stalking

    Accusing Victim of Insurance Fraud Was Not a Defense to Stalking and Violence Post 5012 Posted on March 11, 2025 by…

  • Policy Enforced as Issued

    Policy Enforced as Issued

    No Duty of Care Exists in Arms-Length Negotiations Between Insurer and Insured Post 5011 Posted on March 10, 2025 by…

    2 条评论
  • Fraud is Epidemic

    Fraud is Epidemic

    Guilty Verdict of Mortgage Fraud Scheme Stands Post 5010 Posted on March 7, 2025 by Barry Zalma See the full video at…

    2 条评论
  • Denial of Claim Alone is Not Evidence of Bad Faith

    Denial of Claim Alone is Not Evidence of Bad Faith

    Reliance on Expert Opinion Avoids Claim of Bad Faith Post 5009 Posted on March 6, 2025 by Barry Zalma See the full…

  • Chiropractor Sues to Get Share of Fraudulent Bills

    Chiropractor Sues to Get Share of Fraudulent Bills

    Lack of Standing Requires Dismissal Post 5008 Posted on March 5, 2025 by Barry Zalma See the full video at and at…

  • “Property Investigation Checklists Uncovering Insurance Fraud, 15th Edition”

    “Property Investigation Checklists Uncovering Insurance Fraud, 15th Edition”

    15th Edition of Property Investigation Checklists now Available Posted on March 4, 2025 by Barry Zalma Property…

  • No Coverage for Known False Statements

    No Coverage for Known False Statements

    Exclusion of Defamatory Or Disparaging Statements Made With Knowledge Of Their Falsity Effective Post 5007 Posted on…

  • Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter – March 1, 2025

    Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter – March 1, 2025

    Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter Volume 29, Issue 5 The Source for the Insurance Fraud Professional Post 5008 Posted on…

  • The Duties & Obligations of the Property Adjuster

    The Duties & Obligations of the Property Adjuster

    What Is a First Party Property Adjuster? Post 5006 Posted on February 28, 2025 by Barry Zalma See the full video at…

    1 条评论