To drill, or not to drill.

The Eternal Balancing Act: Meeting Global Fuel Demands While Addressing Environmental Concerns

Oil and gas companies have long played a pivotal role in powering the global economy by supplying the much needed fuel needed to sustain not just the citadels of commerce – its factories and industries but also individual homes and workspaces.

However, as the world becomes increasingly aware of the environmental consequences of fossil fuel consumption, these companies find themselves at a crucial fork in the road having to decide on a widely disparate set of operational and investment decisions. On one hand, they are obligated to continue investing in their core business and ensure profitability, while on the other, they face growing pressure to address environmental concerns and contribute to sustainability, and maybe even scale back in their existing operations!

They increasingly find themselves in an environment where stringent carbon-reduction targets are significantly influencing their day-to-day investment decisions. Consequently, these companies are undergoing rapid transformations in their operating models, affecting both their established and emerging ventures.

While many experts agree that oil and natural gas will continue to be prominent in the global energy mix till, perhaps, as late as 2050, and the reasons extend beyond mere convenience and security of supply. This belief arises from several key factors that firmly position oil and gas companies as key players in the worlds ongoing efforts towards energy transition. These include their extensive global reach, the risk tolerance of their investors, their robust financial positions, and their longstanding relationships with energy consumers and stakeholders.

Profit Maximization vs. Environmental Responsibility

Oil and gas companies operate in a highly competitive market where profitability is often measured in terms of dividends, share prices, and returns on investment. Shareholders expect a healthy return on their investments, and these companies are often judged by their ability to deliver these returns. To meet these expectations, oil and gas companies must explore new reserves, invest in technology and infrastructure, and streamline their operations for efficiency.

However, the pursuit of profitability in the oil and gas sector has come under scrutiny due to its environmental impact. The extraction, transportation, and eventual burning of fossil fuels release greenhouse gases, contributing to an increased carbon footprint across the globe which is associated with rising temperature. This has led to calls for increased environmental responsibility from these companies.

In fact, many traditional oil and gas companies are evolving to the point where they now consider themselves energy companies, mobility companies, or even retail companies, as they diversify and expand into new areas with innovative business models.

Sustainability and digitalization have become the laser focus of many energy and utilities companies, and these industries are actually leading other sectors when it comes to adopting sustainable practices.

?

The Million Barrel Question:

The ethical dilemma faced by oil and gas companies revolves around striking a balance between shareholder returns and environmental concerns. Here are some key aspects of this dilemma:

1. Short-Term Profit vs. Long-Term Sustainability: Oil and gas companies, like every other for profit enterprise, have fiduciary responsibility towards its shareholders and is obligated to generate profits as part of their operations. However, this focus on immediate returns can conflict with the long-term sustainability of the planet. Investing in renewable energy and cleaner technologies may yield smaller profits initially but can contribute to a more sustainable operations in the long run.
2. Regulatory Compliance vs. Ethical Responsibility: Companies are required to comply with environmental regulations, but merely meeting these standards may not align with broader ethical responsibilities. Ethical behavior may necessitate going beyond legal requirements to proactively reduce environmental harm.
3. Reputation and Social License: Maintaining a positive public image is crucial for oil and gas companies. Negative perceptions related to environmental harm can erode their social license to operate. Ethical concerns can influence consumer choices, investor decisions, and even access to resources and markets.
4. Stranded Assets: As the world transitions to cleaner energy sources, there is a risk that some oil and gas reserves could become stranded assets, with little or no economic value. This poses a dilemma for companies that have invested heavily in these assets, as writing them off could impact shareholder returns.
5. Shareholder Pressure: Some shareholders, including institutional investors and socially responsible funds, are increasingly pressuring oil and gas companies to align their operations with environmental goals. This puts additional pressure on these companies to address their ethical responsibilities.

Navigating the Ethical Landscape; the Shift Towards the Greater Green

The transition of oil and gas companies into the power industry is not a recent development. In fact, both private international oil companies (IOCs) and state-owned national oil companies (NOCs) embarked on investments in cleaner energy sources several decades ago. As far back as the early 1980s, oil majors ventured into renewable energy by supporting the manufacturing of solar components and engaging in the development of solar and wind projects.

Over the past decade, BigOil has taken substantial strides in the renewable energy sector. This includes the establishment of a dedicated renewables and energy solutions divisions, along with major investments across business models, encompassing renewables generation, power retail, distributed generation, energy services, and electric vehicle (EV) charging.

Diversification: oil and gas companies recognize the need to transition toward cleaner energy sources and are diversifying their portfolios accordingly. These investments not only align with environmental goals but also position these companies to thrive in a changing energy landscape and meet the evolving needs of consumers and investors:

• Renewable Energy Projects: Many oil and gas companies are investing in renewable energy projects such as solar, wind, and hydropower. They often establish their own renewable energy divisions or subsidiaries to develop, own, and operate these projects. These projects generate electricity from clean sources and contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
• Solar Energy: Oil and gas companies are investing in solar energy by acquiring or developing solar farms. Solar energy is abundant and can be harnessed in various regions, making it an attractive option for diversification.
• Wind Energy: Wind power is another area of focus for diversification. Oil and gas companies invest in onshore and offshore wind farms, taking advantage of strong winds in coastal areas to generate electricity.
• Hydropower: Some oil and gas companies invest in hydropower projects, including the construction and operation of dams and hydroelectric power plants. Hydropower is a reliable and renewable source of electricity.
• Bioenergy: Oil and gas companies may diversify into bioenergy by investing in biofuel production, biomass energy, and waste-to-energy projects. These initiatives use organic materials to generate energy.
• Energy Storage: Investing in energy storage technologies such as batteries is another way for oil and gas companies to support renewable energy. Energy storage helps address the intermittency of renewable sources like solar and wind by storing excess energy for later use.
• Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging Infrastructure: Recognizing the growing popularity of electric vehicles, some oil and gas companies are investing in EV charging infrastructure. This includes setting up charging stations at gas stations and other locations to support the EV market.
• Hydrogen Production: Hydrogen is considered a clean energy carrier, and oil and gas companies are exploring hydrogen production as part of their diversification efforts. Green hydrogen, produced using renewable energy, is of particular interest.
• Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS): While not a renewable energy source itself, CCS technology is essential for reducing carbon emissions from fossil fuel operations. Some oil and gas companies invest in CCS to capture and store carbon dioxide emissions.
• Energy Services: Beyond renewable energy generation, oil and gas companies are expanding into energy services. They offer energy efficiency solutions, demand-side management, and consulting services to help clients reduce energy consumption and emissions.
• Energy Trading and Retail: Oil and gas companies may enter the energy trading and retail sector, buying and selling electricity generated from renewable sources and offering green energy options to customers.

So, what will BigOil do now?

Most oil & gas majors continue to target net-zero emissions, some by 2050, but some of the biggest, including BP and Shell, have scaled back promises to cut back oil and gas production and have signaled they would be there to provide the world with fossil fuel energy as long as it needs it.?

Considering that the world still depends on fossil fuels for more than 80% of its primary energy consumption, it’s not outrageous – from a business perspective – for companies with core oil and gas business to double down on continued extraction of oil and gas. They are hard pressed to reward shareholders in a cyclical industry with frequent booms and busts but also have been hard pressed by the ESG movement from investors to commit to reducing emissions faster, including Scope 3 emissions from the products they sell.?

Oil and gas companies thus find themselves in a challenging ethical dilemma, torn between delivering shareholder returns and addressing environmental concerns. Striking the right balance is a complex task that requires innovative strategies and a long-term perspective.

These companies are now taking varied approaches to the energy transition. Some, like BP, Shell, TotalEnergies, and Enbridge, are already investing heavily in renewable energy, which seems likely to continue. Others will likely join them in the coming years as it becomes more apparent that they will either need to transition to lower-carbon energy or become extinct.

However, many other oil and gas companies will likely continue focusing on fossil fuels. They hope to reduce emissions through CCS and other technologies, so oil demand won't go extinct.

And these are not easy decisions to implement; the choices they make today will shape the world's energy landscape and have far-reaching consequences for both shareholders and the environment.

?