Double Brokering - Can it Be Eliminated?
FreightValidate ? > ?
Carrier and Broker Identity and Compliance Verification System
Introduction
Is it possible to Completely Eliminate Illegal Double Brokering?
Who Knows?
However, what we do know is that the first step in eliminating Double Brokers is IDENTIFYING Double Brokers
For the past 30 days I have been doing research day and night to find out how we got to this point, what we are doing about it, and what needs to be done to prevent and eliminate Double Brokers for good.
Double brokering poses several risks to shippers, carriers, and brokers alike. For shippers, the primary risk is financial. If a shipment is double-brokered, the shipper may end up paying twice for the same service. In addition, the carrier actually transporting the shipment may not have the necessary knowledge or resources to properly handle the shipment, which could lead to delays, damage, or loss.
For carriers, the risks associated with double brokering are also financial. If a carrier accepts a shipment from a broker who has already assigned it to another broker, the carrier may not receive payment for their services. While the US Supreme Court has ruled that the "Carrier Must Be Paid" (Southern Pacific Transportation Company v. Commercial Metals Company, 456 U.S. 336 (1982),?n There are costs involved such as attorney's fees, collections fees, etc. In addition, the carrier may be held liable for any damages or losses that occur during the shipment.
How did we get to this point?
It all starts with the application process to obtain Motor Carrier Authority. If the applicant has a pulse, $300 on a Visa Gift Card, A VIN Number for a Truck and an Insurance company that incorporates greed into their business model in exchange for ethics; The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) will issue a Motor Carrier Authority.
Among other things, there is no requirement for any Identification to prove the person applying is the name on the authority or the owner of the company. The Principal Business Address is not verified. There is no verification to see if the applicant has connections with present or past Motor Carrier Authorities. There is no verification that the applicant is a US Citizen or authorized to work in the US. There is no verification that the applicant even owns a truck, and there is no verification whether the applicant has pending Broker or Carrier Authority(ies).
Without these verifications, it becomes extremely difficult to nearly impossible to track down the owner of the Trucking/Brokerage company when they commit a fraudulent act, steal a load, or double broker freight.
These criminals use untraceable email addresses, list a virtual address, PO Box, UPS Store, or Service Agent address as their principal place of business and have burn phones with fake numbers - They also have several other MC numbers to put into place when caught.
It all starts with the approval by FMCSA of the application.
What are we doing about it?
Many companies such as MyCarrierPortal , Highway , Carrier Assure Inc. , Carrier411, TIA Watchdog are doing what they can to provide Brokers and Carriers with data from many sources to measure the likelihood of a carrier or broker that may be involved in fraudulent activity.
They use algorithms that Red Flag points out things like
These are great tools, however, much of this data comes from an already inaccurate database of information contained within the FMCSA. Further, there are other points to consider. From the examples above we can see that a carrier may receive a good rating when in reality, they should be precluded from moving freight. On the other hand, companies with an "F" grade, may in reality be a great carrier with no infractions.
For instance:
A carrier with 2 trucks with a company might factor receivables with different factoring company so the platform might not catch this. Some Carriers do not factor receivables at all. Although this might only be one of the Red Flags, it is something to be considered.
A carrier that is graded "F" because they have several duplicate MC numbers or have matches use of vehicles, could very well be an creditable carrier with 75 different MC numbers in 75 cities. We recently found a moving company that issues a separate MC number to each branch within their company. Since it is a household goods mover, we surmise that they do this to limit liability, or they purchased other moving companies through the years, or this is just their business model. Further investigation found that all MC numbers have the same email contact. It is the safety department for the corporation. All MC Numbers list the same owners information with FMCSA, and the ownership matches the name of the incorporators on the Articles of Incorporation with the appropriate Secretary of State office.
On the flip side, there are several carriers in these platforms that have high ratings or grades (low risk), yet they are have listed a Virtual Office, PO BOX, UPS Store, Service Agent, etc. as their Principal Place of business. This is a CLEAR violation of 49 CFR part 390.5T. How can someone that is in violation of a most basic provision of the Code be rated A+ ? There are currently HUNDREDS if not THOUSANDS of carriers and brokers that have applied for and been awarded MC Authority who have a Principle Place of Business that is not incompliance with the Code. Research has shown that when a Carrier/Broker has committed a fraudulent or double broker act, in most cases their address was not what listed at a physical and therefore they cannot be traced.
Please see the link below regarding Principal Place of Business Regulations - Requirements and Restrictions are in part 390
A good carrier may have a poor rating due to the number of inspections. With the number of Carriers, Brokers, Drivers, and Commercial Motor Vehicles on the road, and the limited resources at FMCSA, it is not unusual to go a long period of time without being inspected
Help From the FMCSA?
This is not likely. With only approximately 1150 employees, sifting through THOUSANDS of new applications each week, conducting inspections, monitoring insurance cancelations, address changes, changes in ownership etc, it is too much to get done under current conditions.
That being said, technology could automate some of the processes. Applicant has a PO BOX? Application Rejected. Applicant does not list Contact Info? Application Rejected.
What Can WE as an industry do to prevent Fraud and Double Brokering?
We can only fix the problem if Carriers, Shippers, TMS Companies, Carrier Monitoring Companies, Load Boards and Brokers work together. There must be a unified front.
In the short term we must:
FMCSA
领英推荐
Load Boards
When a carrier applies to participate in posting or searching for loads on any load board, the potential customer must be vetted much like brokers are expected in vetting a carrier. Some load boards have their own carrier watch type screening platforms, why are they not using them. If a broker can be held responsible for not properly vetting a carrier, my position that the load board from where the load came from is equally responsible if in their screening process they did not do their vetting. I read an entry recently on one such load board's website that only "Verified and Reliable" Transportation Partners would have access to the platform. Are they really checking or are they of the mindset that "well it is not on us, and the bad broker's money spends just as well as the good broker"?
Carrier Monitoring Companies
TMS Systems
Work with 3rd Party companies such as MyCarrierPackets, Highway, Carrier411, CarrierWatch, CarrierAssure and others. Take care of your customer base by removing the verifiable bad carriers from your TMS system altogether. This way the bad guy cannot even be assigned to the load.
Shippers
Work with only Reputable Brokers and Carriers. It is time to look at value over price
Brokers
Check, Double Check and Check Again
Carriers
Long Term Strategy
1. Make the ability to get a FMCSA Motor Carrier Authority match the significant responsibility that goes with the job. Obtaining FMCSA authority should be more than just filing out a couple forms and putting $300 on a credit card
To become a barber in the United States a person is required to:
To obtain Motor Carrier Authority and become a licensed Motor Carrier one must:
It really is that simple. One person can (and several do) have several MC Docket numbers. When they get caught in a fraud scheme they just use another
My position is that when a driver delivers a pallet of hockey pucks to an airline for a flight on a passenger aircraft, he is required to present a TWIC card. But if someone wants to start a trucking company here, he does not really need anything.
Here is my pipedream for a solution:
Require any current or future applicant company principle(s) (owning 5 percent or more) to:
To make this happen all happen The DOT and FMCSA must require
New Applicants must complete all training, obtain TWIC card, provide proper Certificate of Insurance from Insurance Provider with Verification of TWIC, address, etc. prior to applications
Conclusion
Double brokering is a serious issue that poses significant financial risks to all parties involved. To prevent double brokering, shippers, carriers, and brokers should work together to establish clear communication channels, verify the legitimacy of their partners, and educate themselves about the risks associated with this practice.
But the first step in eliminating double brokers is by identifying them. With assistance of FMCSA and TSA, we can do that.
With the time saved by not passing out MC Numbers and Authorities like Santa Claus passing out Candy Canes to unidentified applicants, FMCSA staff can concentrate on properly vetting new carriers and proper renewal of current carriers.(It is really just making sure they have a TWIC Card, TSA already vetted them)
By requiring a TWIC card as a prerequisite for obtaining an MC or DOT number, for the first time in FMCSA history, there will be no doubt about who owns a Docket Number or a DOT number.?After all it is called a Transportation Workers Identification Card - Lets Properly Identify our Transportation Workers !
We MUST all Collaborate! This will ensure the integrity of the freight industry and protect the interests of all stakeholders, our carriers, brokers, shippers and ultimately the general public.
Information Technology
5 个月In order to get rid of dobule brokering we need to get rid of brokers as a whole and have shippers work with carriers dirrectly.
Loss Prevention & Carrier Compliance Manager at Blakeman Transportation
1 年Excellent information!!!! Keep spreading the word - i think we are starting to make a dent out there.